UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON,Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)

of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  x

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨

Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨

Confidential, for useUse of the Commission onlyOnly (as

permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

x

Definitive Proxy Statement

¨

Definitive Additional Materials

¨

x

Definitive Proxy Statement

¨Definitive Additional Materials
¨Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in itsIn Its Charter)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x

No fee required.

¨

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

     

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

     

(5)

Total fee paid:

 

     

¨

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

¨

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 

     

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

     

(3)

Filing Party:

 

     

(4)

Date Filed:

 

     


 

LOGOLOGO

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.

2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 2600

Houston, TX 77056

(713) 629-7600

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD MAY 22, 201421, 2015

To our Stockholders:

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Quanta Services, Inc. (“Quanta”) will be held in the Williams Tower, 2nd Floor Conference Center, Auditorium No. 1, located at 2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77056, on May 22, 201421, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. local time. At the meeting, you will be asked to consider and act upon the following matters, which are more fully described in the accompanying Proxy Statement:

1.            Election of ten directors nominated by our Board of Directors;

1.

Election of ten directors nominated by our Board of Directors;

2.            Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2014;

2.

Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2015;

3.            Approving, by non-binding advisory vote, Quanta’s executive compensation; and

3.

Approving, by non-binding advisory vote, Quanta’s executive compensation; and

4.            

4.

Acting upon any other matters that are properly brought before the meeting, or any adjournments or postponements of the meeting, by or at the direction of the Board of Directors.

Our stockholders of record at the close of business on March 24, 201423, 2015 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

LOGO

Carolyn M. Campbell

Corporate Secretary

Houston, Texas

April 10, 20149, 2015

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR

THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 22, 2014:21, 2015:

The Notice, Proxy Statement and

20132014 Annual Report to Stockholders

are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

GENERAL INFORMATION – QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETING

 1  

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

7

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

 7  

Security Ownership of Management

 98  

PROPOSAL NO. 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 10  

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

13

Board Leadership Structure

 13  

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

 14  

Board Independence

 15  

Executive Sessions of Non-Management Directors

 15  

Director Meetings

 15  

Committees of the Board

 16  

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 17  

Code of Ethics and Business Conduct

 17  

Communications with the Board

 18  

Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Director

 18  

Director Qualifications

 1819  

Director Compensation

 19  

20132014 Director Compensation Table

 22  

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 23  

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND& ANALYSIS

24

Executive Summary

 2425  

Compensation Philosophy and Process

27

Overview

27

Use of Compensation Benchmarking Studies

 28

Management’s Role in the Compensation-Setting Process

30

2013 Compensation Committee Meetings

31

Consideration of Say-on-Pay Results

31

Exercise of Discretion in Executive Compensation Decisions

31

“Clawback” Policy

31

Equity Award Grant Practices

31  

Elements of Executive Compensation

 32

Changes to Executive Compensation Implemented for 2014

33  

Executive Compensation Decisions for the 2013 Performance Year2014

 32

Changes Implemented for 2013

33

Base Salary

33

Annual Incentive Plan

34

Supplemental Incentive Plan

35

Discretionary Incentive Plan

39

Transaction Bonuses

39

Other Compensation

39

Executive Succession Matters

4036  

Changes to 20142015 Executive Compensation Program

 41

Overview of Changes

41

Annual Incentive Plan

43

Long-Term Incentive Plan

43

Deferred Compensation Plan

4447  

Stock Ownership Guidelines

 4547  

Pledging, Hedging and Other Transactions in Quanta Securities

 4548  

Employment Agreements

 4648  


Indemnification Agreements

 4648  

Risk Considerations in our Compensation Program

 4649  

Impact of Regulatory Requirements on our Executive Compensation Decisions

 4850  

Conclusion

 4850  

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2014 Summary Compensation Table

 4951  

2013 Summary Compensation Table

49

2013 All Other Compensation Table

50

20132014 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

 5154  

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20132014 Fiscal Year-End

 5256  

20132014 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

 5357

2014 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

58  

Fees of the Compensation Committee Consultant

 54

Equity Compensation Plan Information

5559  

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

 5560

Equity Compensation Plan Information

66  

CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS

Related Party Transactions

 6467  

Review of Related Party Transactions

 6569  

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 6569  


COMMITTEE REPORTS

66

Compensation Committee Report

 6670  

Audit Committee Report

 6671  

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

67

Audit Fees

 6772  

PROPOSAL NO. 2: RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 6873  

PROPOSAL NO. 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 6974  

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

71

Stockholder Proposals and Nominations of Directors for the 20152016 Annual Meeting

 7176  

Other Matters

 7176  


LOGOLOGO

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.

2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 2600

Houston, TX 77056

(713) 629-7600

 

 

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD MAY 22, 201421, 2015

 

 

We are distributing and making available this Proxy Statement, the form of proxy

or voting instructions and our 20132014 Annual Report beginning on or about April 10, 2014.9, 2015.

We are furnishing this proxy statement in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors (“Board”) to be voted at the 20142015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Quanta Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, sometimes referred to as the Company, Quanta, us, we or like terms. The annual meeting will be held in Houston, Texas on Thursday, May 22, 2014,21, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. local time. The proxy materials, including this proxy statement, the form of proxy or voting instructions and our 20132014 annual report, are being distributed and made available on or about April 10, 2014.9, 2015.

In accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we are providing our stockholders access to our proxy materials on the Internet. Accordingly, a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”) will be mailed to most of our stockholders on or about April 10, 2014.9, 2015. Stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on a website referred to in the Notice or request a printed set of the proxy materials to be sent to them by following the instructions in the Notice.

The Notice also provides instructions on how to inform us to send future proxy materials to you electronically by e-mail or in printed form by mail. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by e-mail, you will receive an e-mail next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials by e-mail or printed form will remain in effect until you terminate it.

Choosing to receive future proxy materials by e-mail will allow us to provide you with the information you need in a timelier manner, save us the cost of printing and mailing documents to you, and conserve natural resources.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETING

What is the purpose of the meeting?

The meeting will be Quanta’s regular annual meeting of stockholders, and stockholders will be asked to vote on the following matters:

 

election of ten directors nominated by our Board;

 

ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2014;2015; and

 

approval, by non-binding advisory vote, of Quanta’s executive compensation.

How does the Board recommend that stockholders vote?

The Board recommends that stockholders vote as follows:

 

FOR the election of all nominees as directors;


General Information

 

FOR ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2014;2015; and

 

FOR the advisory resolution approving Quanta’s executive compensation.


General Information

When and where is the annual meeting?

The annual meeting will be held in the Williams Tower, 2nd Floor Conference Center, Auditorium No. 1, located at 2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77056, on May 22, 201421, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. local time.

Who can attend the meeting?

All stockholders of record as of March 24, 2014,23, 2015, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the meeting, and each may be accompanied by one guest. Seating, however, is limited. Admission to the meeting will be on a first-come, first-served basis. Registration and seating will begin at 8:30 a.m. on May 21, 2015. Each stockholder will be asked to present valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the meeting. To obtain directions to the meeting, please contact our Corporate Secretary at713-629-7600.

If you hold your shares in “street name” (that is, through a broker, bank or other nominee), you will need to bring a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the record date and check in at the registration desk at the meeting.

Who is entitled to vote at the meeting?

Holders of record of (A)(i) our Common Stock, par value $0.00001 per share, (B)(ii) our Series F Preferred Stock, par value $0.00001 per share, and (C)(iii) our Series G Preferred Stock, par value $0.00001 per share, respectively, at the close of business on March 24, 2014,23, 2015, the record date for the meeting, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting. If you were a stockholder of record on that date, you will be entitled to vote all of the shares that you held on that date at the meeting, or at any adjournments or postponements of the meeting, unless a new record date is then set.

As of March 24, 2014,23, 2015, there were 213,426,795204,430,017 shares of our Common Stock, one share of our Series F Preferred Stock, and one share of our Series G Preferred Stock, respectively, outstanding and entitled to vote.

What are the voting rights of the holders of Common Stock, Series F Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock?

Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote on each matter on which it may vote. The share of Series F Preferred Stock is entitled to a number of votes equal to the number of outstanding Class A non-voting exchangeable common shares of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Valard Construction Ltd., a British Columbia corporation, on each matter on which it may vote. Valard Construction Ltd. had 3,500,000 Class A non-voting exchangeable common shares outstanding on March 24, 2014.23, 2015. The share of Series G Preferred Stock is entitled to a number of votes equal to the number of outstanding Class A non-voting exchangeable common shares of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Northstar Energy Services Inc., an Alberta corporation, on each matter on which it may vote. Northstar Energy Services Inc. had 899,858 Class A non-voting exchangeable common shares outstanding on March 24, 2014.23, 2015.

Holders of Common Stock, Series F Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock vote together as a single class on all matters. The required vote to approve each item to be voted on at the meeting is described below.

What vote is required to approve each item to be voted on at the meeting?

Directors are elected by a majority of the votes cast with respect to such director in uncontested elections, such that a nominee for director will be elected to the Board if the votes cast FOR the nominee’s election exceed the votes cast AGAINST such nominee’s election. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not counted as votes cast for purposes

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

2


General Information

 

 

cast for purposes of the election of directors and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of such election. Even if a nominee is not re-elected, he or she will remain in office as a director until his or her earlier resignation or removal. Each of the current director nominees has signed a letter of resignation that will be effective if the nominee is not re-elected at the meeting and the Board accepts his or resignation following the meeting. If a nominee is not re-elected, the Board will decide whether to accept the director’s resignation in accordance with the procedures listed in Quanta’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on our website atwww.quantaservices.com.

Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares of Common Stock, Series F Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock, considered together as a single class, present at the meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on that proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on such proposal.

Advisory approval of the resolution on Quanta’s executive compensation requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares of Common Stock, Series F Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock, considered together as a single class, present at the meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on that proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the resolution. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the advisory vote. The results of this vote are not binding on the Board, whether or not the proposal is adopted by the aforementioned voting standard. In evaluating the vote on this resolution, the Board intends to consider the voting results in their entirety.

Any other matter properly brought before the meeting will be decided by the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares of Common Stock, Series F Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock, considered together as a single class, present at the meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter.

Why did I receive a Notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials this year instead of a full set of proxy materials?

In accordance with SEC rules, we are providing access to our proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, we have sent to most of our stockholders a Notice instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. The Notice contains instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet and how to request a paper copy. In addition, stockholders may request to receive future proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail. A stockholder’s election to receive proxy materials by mail or e-mail will remain in effect until the stockholder terminates it.

Why didn’t I receive a Notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials?

We are providing certain stockholders, including those who have previously requested to receive paper copies of the proxy materials, with paper copies of the proxy materials instead of a Notice. If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Quanta in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receive all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions provided with your proxy materials and on your proxy card or voting instruction card to vote using the Internet. When prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access stockholder communications electronically in the future.

Can I vote my stock by completing and returning the Notice?

No. The Notice will, however, provide instructions on how to vote by Internet, by telephone, by requesting and returning a paper proxy card, or by submitting a ballot in person at the annual meeting.

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

3


General Information

How can I access the proxy materials over the Internet?

Your Notice or proxy card will contain instructions on how to view our proxy materials for the annual meeting on the Internet. Our proxy materials are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

3


General Information

How do I vote?

You may vote by any of the following methods:

(i) Internet. Vote on the Internet atwww.proxyvote.com. This website also allows electronic proxy voting using smartphones, tablets and other web-connected mobile devices (additional charges may apply pursuant to your service provider plan). Simply follow the instructions on the Notice, or if you received a proxy card by mail, follow the instructions on the proxy card and you can confirm that your vote has been properly recorded. If you vote on the Internet, you can request electronic delivery of future proxy materials. Internet voting facilities for stockholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on May 21, 2014.20, 2015.

(ii) Telephone. Vote by telephone by following the instructions on the Notice or, if you received a proxy card, by following the instructions on the proxy card. Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your stock and confirm that your vote has been properly recorded. Telephone voting facilities for stockholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on May 21, 2014.20, 2015.

(iii) Mail. If you received a proxy card by mail, vote by mail by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card in the pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope provided. If you vote by mail and your proxy card is returned unsigned, then your vote cannot be counted. If you vote by mail and the returned proxy card is signed without indicating how you want to vote, then your proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board. If mailed, your completed and signed proxy card must be received by May 21, 2014.20, 2015.

(iv) Meeting. You may attend and vote at the annual meeting. The Board recommends that you vote using one of the first three methods discussed above, as it is not practical for most stockholders to attend and vote at the annual meeting. Using one of the first three methods discussed above to vote will not limit your right to vote at the annual meeting if you later decide to attend in person. If your stock is held in street name (for example, held in the name of a bank, broker, or other nominee), you must obtain a proxy executed in your favor from your bank, broker or other holder of record to be able to vote in person at the annual meeting.

If I vote by telephone or Internet and received a proxy card in the mail, do I need to return my proxy card?

No, you do not need to return your proxy card if you vote by telephone or Internet.

If I vote by mail, telephone or Internet, may I still attend the annual meeting?

Yes, you may attend the annual meeting even if you have voted by mail, telephone or Internet.

Can I change my vote?

Yes. You may revoke your proxy before the voting polls are closed at the annual meeting, by the following methods:

 

  

voting at a later time by Internet on the websitewww.proxyvote.com until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on May 21, 201420, 2015 (not available to the holders of Series F Preferred Stock or Series G Preferred Stock);

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

4


General Information

 

voting at a later time by telephone, following the instructions included with your Notice or proxy card, until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on May 21, 201420, 2015 (not available to the holders of Series F Preferred Stock or Series G Preferred Stock);

 

voting in person, or giving notice to the inspector of elections, at the annual meeting; or

 

signing, dating and delivering to Quanta’s Corporate Secretary a proxy with a later date or a written revocation of your most recent proxy.

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

4


General Information

The powers of the proxy holders will be revoked with respect to your shares if you attend the meeting in person and vote your shares in person by completing a written ballot. Attendance at the meeting will not by itself revoke a previously granted proxy. If you are a street name stockholder and you vote by proxy, you may later revoke your proxy by informing the holder of record in accordance with that entity’s procedures.

What is the effect of an advisory vote?

Because your vote with respect to approval of our named executive officer (“NEO”) compensation is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board. However, our Compensation Committee and the Board will take the outcome of the vote into account when considering future compensation arrangements for our executive officers.

What constitutes a quorum?

The holders of shares representing both (i) a majority of the aggregate outstanding shares entitled to vote, and (ii) a majority of the aggregate voting power of Common Stock, Series F Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock entitled to vote must be present, in person or by proxy, to constitute a quorum to transact business at the annual meeting.

As of March 24, 2014,23, 2015, there were 213,426,795204,430,017 shares of our Common Stock with aggregate voting power of 213,426,795204,430,017 votes, one share of our Series F Preferred Stock with aggregate voting power of 3,500,000 votes, and one share of our Series G Preferred Stock with aggregate voting power of 899,858 votes, respectively, outstanding and entitled to vote.

Your stock is counted as present at the annual meeting if you attend the annual meeting and vote in person or if you properly return a proxy by Internet, telephone or mail. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as present for purposes of establishing a quorum at the meeting.

What are broker non-votes?

The New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) permits brokers to vote their customers’ stock held in street name on routine matters, such as the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, when the brokers have not received voting instructions from their customers. However, the NYSE does not allow brokers to vote their customers’ shares held in street name on non-routine matters unless they have received voting instructions from their customers. In such cases, the uninstructed shares for which the broker is unable to vote are called broker non-votes.

What routine matters will be voted on at the annual meeting?

Ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm is the only matter to be voted on at the meeting on which brokers may vote in their discretion on behalf of customers who have not provided voting instructions.

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

5


General Information

What non-routine matters will be voted on at the annual meeting?

The election of directors and the advisory vote on executive compensation are non-routine matters on which brokers are not allowed to vote unless they have received voting instructions from their customers.

What is the effect of not casting a vote?

If you are a stockholder of record and you do not cast your vote, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any of the matters that properly come before the meeting. If you hold your shares in street name, and you do not instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote in the election of directors, the advisory vote to approve executive compensation or any other non-routine matter, no votes will be cast on your behalf on such matters, but your broker, bank or other nominee will continue to have discretion to vote any uninstructed shares on the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm.

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

5


General Information

Where can I find the voting results of the annual meeting?

We plan to announce preliminary voting results at the meeting and publish final results in a Current Report on Form 8-K or an amendment thereto timely filed with the SEC. You may access or obtain a copy of thesethis and other reports free of charge on the Company’s website atwww.quantaservices.com or by contacting our investor relations department atinvestors@quantaservices.com. Also, the referenced Current Report on Form 8-K, any amendments thereto and other reports filed by Quanta with the SEC are available to you over the Internet on the SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov.

Who pays for the proxy solicitation related to the annual meeting?

The proxies being solicited hereby are being solicited by Quanta. The costs of soliciting proxies hereby, which may include the cost of preparing, printing and mailing the proxy materials, will be borne by Quanta. Our officers, directors and employees may, but without compensation other than their regular compensation, solicit proxies by further mailing or personal conversations, or by telephone, facsimile, postings on our website or other electronic means. We will also request banks, brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward proxy materials to beneficial owners of our common stockCommon Stock and obtain their voting instructions. We will, upon request, reimburse brokerage firms and others for their reasonable expenses in forwarding solicitation materials to beneficial owners of our common stock.Common Stock. Quanta has not engaged an outside proxy solicitor for the annual meeting.

Can I get more than one copy of the proxy materials if multiple stockholders are located at my address?

In some instances, only one proxy statement and annual report is being delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless we have received contrary instructions from one of those stockholders. Quanta undertakes to promptly deliver upon request a separate copy of such materials to any stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the documents was delivered. Stockholders sharing an address may also request delivery of a single copy of the proxy materials, but in such event will still receive separate proxies for each account. To request separate or single delivery of these materials now or in the future, stockholders should notify Quanta by contacting the Corporate Secretary in writing at Quanta Services, Inc., 2800 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 2600, Houston, Texas 77056 or by phone at 713-629-7600.

What if I receive more than one proxy card?

If you hold your shares in more than one type of account or your shares are registered differently, you may receive more than one proxy card. We encourage you to vote each proxy card that you receive.

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

6


Security Ownership of Certain

Beneficial Owners and Management

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth information, as of April 1, 2014,2015, unless otherwise indicated, with respect to each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock, Series F Preferred Stock or Series G Preferred Stock. Except as indicated otherwise, the beneficial owners named below have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned.

 

Name and Address

of Beneficial Owner

    Title of Class    Number of Shares
    Beneficially Owned    
 Percent
    of Class(1)    

T. Rowe Price Associates,The Vanguard Group, Inc.

Common Stock     20,241,23715,961,026 (2) 9.57.8

100 E. Pratt StreetVanguard Blvd.

Baltimore, Maryland 21202Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

BlackRock, Inc.

Common Stock     13,920,02712,184,270 (3) 6.56.0

40 East 52nd52nd Street

New York, New York 10022

The Vanguard Group

 Common Stock    14,281,982 (4)6.7%  

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

12988672 Alberta Ltd.(5)(4)

Common Stock 296,841   * 

Victor Budzinski, Trustee(5)(4)

Series F 1 (6)(5) 100.0

708 Hollingsworth Green

Preferred Stock

Edmonton, Alberta T6R 3G6

1144809 Alberta Ltd.(7)(6)

Series G 1 (8)(7) 100.0

Box 23264

Preferred Stock

Grand Prairie, Alberta T8V 7G7

 

*

Percentage of shares does not exceed 1%.

(1)

The percent of class beneficially owned is calculated based on (A)(i) with respect to our Common Stock, 213,426,795204,495,383 shares, (B)(ii) with respect to our Series F Preferred Stock, one share, and (C)(iii) with respect to our Series G Preferred Stock, one share, in each case issued and outstanding as of April 1, 2014.2015. In addition, if a person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of shares within 60 days following April 1, 2014,2015, those shares are deemed beneficially owned by that person as of that date and are deemed to be outstanding solely for the purpose of determining the percentage of common stockCommon Stock that he or she owns. Those shares are not included in the computations for any other person.

 

(2)

Based on Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 7)4) filed on February 12, 2014 by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (“Price Associates”), which has sole voting power over 5,125,202 of such shares and sole dispositive power over all such shares. The Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 7) further indicates that these securities are owned by various individual and institutional investors for which Price Associates serves as an investment adviser with power to direct investments and/or sole power to vote the securities. For purposes of the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), Price Associates is deemed to be a beneficial owner of such securities; however, Price Associates expressly disclaims that it is, in fact, the beneficial owner of such securities.

(3)

Based on Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 4) filed on January 30, 2014 by BlackRock, Inc., a parent holding company for a number of investment management subsidiaries, which has sole voting power with respect to 12,125,363 shares and sole dispositive power over all 13,920,027 shares.

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

7


Security Ownership of Certain

Beneficial Owners and Management

(4)

Based on Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 3) filed on February 12, 201410, 2015 by The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“Vanguard”), an investment adviser, which has sole voting power over 347,943373,309 shares, sole dispositive power over 13,964,93915,612,517 shares, and shared dispositive power over 317,043348,509 shares. The Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 3)4) further indicates that Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vanguard, is the beneficial owner of 272,043289,909 shares as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts, and Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vanguard, is the beneficial owner of 120,900142,000 shares as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings.

 

(5)(3)

Based on Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 5) filed on February 9, 2015 by BlackRock, Inc., a parent holding company for a number of investment management subsidiaries, which has sole voting power with respect to 10,538,613 shares and sole dispositive power over all 12,184,270 shares.

(4)

As of April 1, 2015, Victor Budzinski, record owner of one share of Series F Preferred Stock, ownsowned 100% of the equity interest in 12988672 Alberta Ltd., an Alberta corporation and record owner of 296,841 shares of our Common Stock.

 

(6)

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

7


Security Ownership of Certain

Beneficial Owners and Management

(5)

As of April 1, 2014,2015, the one issued and outstanding share of our Series F Preferred Stock had voting rights equivalent to 3,500,000 shares, or 1.6%1.7%, of our Common Stock.

 

(7)(6)

As of April 1, 2015, Jay Gunnarson ownsowned 100% of the equity interest in 1144809 Alberta Ltd., an Alberta corporation and record owner of one share of Series G Preferred Stock.

 

(8)(7)

As of April 1, 2014,2015, the one issued and outstanding share of our Series G Preferred Stock had voting rights equivalent to 899,858 shares, or 0.4%, of our Common Stock.

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

8


Security Ownership of Certain

Beneficial Owners and Management

Security Ownership of Management

The following table sets forth, as of April 1, 2014,2015, the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by (i) each of our directors and director nominees, (ii) each of our named executive officers listed in the 20132014 Summary Compensation Table (collectively, the “NEOs”), and (iii) all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

 

 Shares of Common Stock Beneficially  Owned(1)

Name of Beneficial Owner

Number(2) Percent of Class 

Directors:(3)

Vincent D. Foster

 230,750234,858 (4)(5) *  

 Louis C. GolmBruce Ranck

 81,01994,325 (4)(5)(6) *  

 Bruce RanckLouis C. Golm

 77,81485,127 (4)(5)(6) *  

James R. Ball

 52,08156,189 (4)(5)(6) *  

Bernard Fried

 47,59247,700 (4)(5)(6) *  

J. Michal Conaway

 23,01524,723 (4)(5) *  

Worthing F. Jackman

 17,40521,513 (4)(5) *  

Pat Wood, III

 17,39816,506 (4)(5) *  

Margaret B. Shannon

 7,53111,639 (4) *  

Named Executive Officers:

 John R. ColsonJames F. O’Neil III

 866,798210,553 (6)(5)(7) *  

 James H. HaddoxEarl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr

 185,497128,619 (5)(6)(7)

 James F. O’Neil III

119,064 *  

 Earl C. (Duke) Austin, JrDerrick A. Jensen

 91,058111,859 (5)(7) *  

 Derrick A. JensenJesse E. Morris

 6,34989,607 (5)(7) *  

 Nicholas M. GrindstaffSteven J. Kemps

 1,45329,392 (7) *  

 PeterEric B. O’BrienBrown

 5,937 (8) *  

All directors and executive officers as a group (17(19 persons)

 891,7571,124,957 (4)(5)(6)(7) *  

 

*

Percentage of shares does not exceed 1%.

(1)

The percent of class beneficially owned is calculated based on 213,426,795204,495,383 shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding as of April 1, 2014,2015, adjusted as required by the rules promulgated by the SEC. Shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon vesting of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) within 60 days of April 1, 20142015 and vested RSUs that are not yet settled are deemed outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding such RSUs for purposes of computing the number of shares and percentage beneficially owned, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage beneficially owned by any other person.

(2)

Except as otherwise indicated, the persons named have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable.

(3)

Mr. O’Neil is an executive officer and director of Quanta, but his beneficial ownership is reported with the executive officers.

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

8


Security Ownership of Certain

Beneficial Owners and Management

(4)

Includes shares that may be acquired upon vesting of RSUs within 60 days of April 1, 20142015 as follows: 7,6796,511 shares for Mr. Ranck; 4,8454,108 shares for each of the other non-employee directors; and 46,43939,375 shares for all directors and executive officers as a group.

(5)

Includes RSUs that have vested or that will vest within 60 days of April 1, 2015 and for which settlement has been or will be deferred, as applicable, pursuant to the deferred compensation plans maintained by Quanta as follows: 8,953 shares for each of Messrs. Foster, Golm, Fried, Jackman and Wood; 6,531 shares for Mr. Ball; 7,306 shares for Mr. Conaway; 95,827 shares for Mr. O’Neil; 38,738 shares for Mr. Austin; 24,867 shares for Mr. Jensen; 5,261 shares for Mr. Morris; and 228,088 shares for all directors and executive officers as a group.

(6)

Includes shares held by family trusts or family limited partnerships as to which the named person and his or her spouse have shared voting and investment power as follows: 87,814 shares for Mr. Ranck; 76,174 shares for Mr. Golm; 70,135 for Mr. Ranck; 47,236 shares for Mr. Ball; 42,74738,747 shares for Mr. Fried; 20,000 shares for Mr. Austin; and 256,292269,971 shares for all directors and executive officers as a group.

(6)

Includes 554,142 shares pledged as collateral.

(7)

Does not include shares underlying performance units that are scheduled to vest, to the extent performance objectives are achieved, on either December 31, 2016 or December 31, 2017 as follows: 142,453 units for Mr. Colson retiredO’Neil; 50,293 units for Mr. Austin; 37,213 units for Mr. Jensen; 11,196 units for Mr. Morris; 18,561 units for Mr. Kemps; and 281,105 units for all directors and officers as Executive Chairman effective May 23, 2013. a group.

(8)

Mr. Haddox retiredBrown ceased to serve as Executive Vice President effective March 31, 2014. Therefore, thean executive officer as of September 15, 2014, and therefore any shares beneficially owned by Mr. Colson and Mr. HaddoxBrown are excluded from the totalstotal for all directors and executives as a group.

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

9


Quanta Board of Directors

 

PROPOSAL NO. 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board currently consists of ten directors, whose current terms of office all expire at the 20142015 annual meeting. The Board proposes that the following ten nominees be elected for a new term of one year or until their successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal. Each of the nominees has consented to serve if elected. If a nominee becomes unavailable to serve as a director, the Board may designate a substitute nominee. In that case, the persons named as proxies will vote for the substitute nominee designated by the Board. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named below.

The director nominees standing for election are:

 

Name

     Age     

Position(s) with Quanta

     Director Since      Age   

Position(s) with Quanta

  Director Since   

James R. Ball

 71  Director 1998 72  Director 1998  

J. Michal Conaway

 65  Director 2007 66  Director 2007  

Vincent D. Foster

 57  Director 1998 58  Director 1998  

Bernard Fried

 57  Director 2004 58  Director 2004  

Louis C. Golm

 72  Director 2002 73  Director 2002  

Worthing F. Jackman

 49  Director 2005 50  Director 2005  

James F. O’Neil III

 55  President, Chief Executive Officer and Director 2011 56  President, Chief Executive Officer and Director 2011  

Bruce Ranck

 65  Chairman of the Board 2005 66  Chairman of the Board 2005  

Margaret B. Shannon

 64  Director 2012 65  Director 2012  

Pat Wood, III

 51  Director 2006 52  Director 2006  

James R. Ballhas been a member of the Board of Directors since 1998 and is a private investor. He previously served in various management positions with Vista Chemical Company for over twenty-five years, most recently as Chief Executive Officer and President from 1992 until his retirement in 1995. He also previously served as a director of Kraton Polymers, LLC from 2004 to 2008, ABS Group Inc. from 2003 to 2005, The Carbide/Graphite Group, Inc. from 1994 to 2002, and Rexene Corporation from 1996 to 1997. Mr. Ball holds a Bachelor of Science in Mathematics degree and a Master of Science in Management degree. The Board believes Mr. Ball’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his over twenty-five years of management experience, including three years as a chief executive officer, his years of service on boards of other public companies, and his extensive experience with corporate governance, financial analysis, business strategy and management.

J. Michal Conaway has been a member of the Board of Directors since August 2007. He has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Peregrine Group, LLC, an executive consulting firm, since 2002. Mr. Conaway has been providing consulting and advisory services since 2000. Prior to 2000, Mr. Conaway held various management and executive positions, including serving as Chief Financial Officer of Fluor Corporation, an engineering, procurement, construction and maintenance services provider. Since 2008, Mr. Conaway has served as a director of GT Advanced Technologies, Inc., formerly known as GT Solar International, Inc. He previously served as a director of InfraSource Services, Inc. from February 2006 to August 2007 and Cherokee International Corporation from April 2008 to November 2008. Mr. Conaway holds an M.B.A. degree and is a Certified Public Accountant. The Board believes Mr. Conaway’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his prior service as the chief financial officer of multiple public corporations, including those within Quanta’s line of business, his years of service on boards of other public and private companies, his extensive financial and accounting expertise, and his advisory experience in strategic, operational and financial matters.

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

10


Quanta Board of Directors

Vincent D. Fosterhas been a member of the Board of Directors since 1998. He has served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Main Street Capital Corporation, a specialty investment company, since March 2007. He also has served as Senior Managing Director of Main Street Capital Partners, LLC (and its predecessor

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

10


Quanta Board of Directors

firms), a private investment firm, since 1997. Mr. Foster has served as a director of Team Industrial Services, Inc. since 2005. Mr. Foster previously served as a director of U.S. Concrete, Inc. from 1999 to 2010, Carriage Services, Inc. from 1999 to 2011, and HMS Income Fund, Inc. from June 2012 to March 2013. Mr. Foster holds a J.D. degree and is a Certified Public Accountant. The Board believes Mr. Foster’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his significant contributions and service to Quanta since its inception, his experience as chief executive officer of a public corporation, his many years of service on boards of other public companies and his extensive tax, accounting, merger and acquisitions, financial and corporate governance expertise.

Bernard Friedhas been a member of the Board of Directors since March 2004. Since June 2012, he has served as the Executive Chairman of OpTerra Energy Group, an energy conservation measures services provider. Mr. Fried continues to serve, since March 2011, as the Executive Chairman of Energy Solutions International, a software provider to the pipeline industry, and he has also been an independent consultant. He previously served as Chief Executive Officer and President of Siterra Corporation, a software services provider, from May 2005 to March 2011. From November 2003 until May 2005, he served as an independent consultant to the financial and software services industries. Mr. Fried served as Chief Executive Officer and President of Citadon, Inc., a software services provider, from 2001 until November 2003, and Chief Financial Officer and Managing Director of Bechtel Enterprises, Inc., a financing and development subsidiary of Bechtel Group, Inc., from 1997 until 2000. Mr. Fried holds a Bachelor of Engineering degree and an M.B.A. degree. The Board believes Mr. Fried’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his executive management experience, including at companies within Quanta’s line of business, his years of service on boards of public and private companies, and his extensive executive-level experience in operations, engineering, construction, project management, finance and international business.

Louis C. Golmhas been a member of the Board of Directors since July 2002 and from May 2001 until May 2002. He has been an independent consultant and senior advisor to the telecommunications and information management industries since 1999. Mr. Golm holds a Master of Science in Management degree and an M.B.A. degree. The Board believes Mr. Golm’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his numerous years of executive management experience, including as chief executive officer of a large telecommunications company, his years of service as a director of other public and private companies, and his insight regarding sales and marketing, accounting/finance, risk mitigation and strategic development.

Worthing F. Jackman has been a member of the Board of Directors since May 2005. He has served as Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer of Waste Connections, Inc., an integrated solid waste services company, since September 2004 and served as its Vice President - Finance and Investor Relations from April 2003 until August 2004. From 1991 until April 2003, Mr. Jackman held various positions with Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., an investment banking firm, most recently serving as a Managing Director, Global Industrial and Environmental Services Group. Mr. Jackman holds an M.B.A. degree. The Board believes Mr. Jackman’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his experience as the chief financial officer of a public corporation and his investment banking experience, as well as his extensive financial and accounting expertise.

James F. O’Neil IIIhas been a member of the Board of Directors and has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since May 2011. He previously served as our President and Chief Operating Officer from October 2008 to May 2011, our Senior Vice President of Operations Integration and Audit from December 2002 to October 2008, and our Vice President of Operations Integration from August 1999 to December 2002. Mr. O’Neil holds a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering degree. The Board believes Mr. O’Neil’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his significant contributions to Quanta in strategy, mergers and acquisitions and internal audit, his operational and safety leadership service with Quanta, including as its President and Chief Executive Officer, his technical expertise, and his extensive knowledge of the industries Quanta serves.

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

11


Quanta Board of Directors

Bruce Ranck has been a member of the Board of Directors since May 2005 and Chairman of the Board since May 2013. He has been a partner with Bayou City Partners, a venture capital firm, since 1999. Mr. Ranck served as Chief Executive Officer of Tartan Textile Services, Inc., a healthcare linen services provider, from August 2003 until

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

11


Quanta Board of Directors

April 2006. From 1970 until 1999, he held various positions with Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc., a provider of waste management services, most recently as Chief Executive Officer and President. Mr. Ranck served as a director of Dynamex Inc. from 2002 until February 2011. He received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Michigan State University in 1970. The Board believes Mr. Ranck’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his executive management experience, including as chief executive officer of a large public corporation, his extensive acquisition integration experience, and his years of service on boards of other public and private companies.

Margaret B. Shannon has been a member of the Board of Directors since December 2012. She served as Vice President and General Counsel of BJ Services Company, an international oilfield services company, from 1994 to 2010, when it was acquired by Baker Hughes Incorporated. Prior to 1994, she was a partner with the law firm of Andrews Kurth LLP. Ms. Shannon has served on the board of directors of Matador Resources Company, an exploration and production company, since June 2011. In addition, she is active in several not-for-profit organizations in Houston. Ms. Shannon received her J.D. cum laude from Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law in 1976 and her Bachelor of Arts degree from Baylor University in 1971. The Board believes Ms. Shannon’s qualifications to serve on the Board include vast experience in the energy industry, as well as in corporate governance, and her years of service on boards of other public and private companies.

Pat Wood, IIIhas been a member of the Board of Directors since May 2006. He has served as a Principal of Wood3 Resources, an energy infrastructure developer, since July 2005. From 2001 until July 2005, Mr. Wood served as Chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. From 1995 until 2001, he chaired the Public Utility Commission of Texas. Prior to 1995, Mr. Wood was an attorney with Baker Botts L.L.P., a global law firm, and an associate project engineer with Arco Indonesia, an oil and gas company, in Jakarta. Mr. Wood has served as a director of SunPower Corporation since 2005, and non-executive chairman of the board of directors of Dynegy, Inc. since October 2012.2012 and director of Memorial Resource Development since June 2014. Mr. Wood previously served as a director of First Wind Holdings Inc. from 2010 to June 2012. Mr. Wood holds a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering degree and a J.D. degree. The Board believes Mr. Wood’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his significant strategic and operational management experience, his unique perspective and extensive knowledge with regard to the legal and regulatory process and policy development at the government level, his years of service as a director of other public and private companies, and his energy infrastructure development expertise.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a voteFOR the election of each of the director nominees.

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

12


Corporate Governance

 

We are committed to having sound corporate governance practices that maximize stockholder value in a manner consistent with legal requirements and the highest standard of integrity. In that regard, the Board has adopted guidelines that provide a framework for the governance of Quanta. In addition, we continually review these guidelines and regularly monitor developments in the area of corporate governance. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are posted on our website atwww.quantaservices.com under the heading “Investors & Media / Corporate Governance.”

Board Leadership Structure

The Board believes that the leadership structure of Quanta’s Board should include either an independent non-executive Chairman of the Board or a Lead Director who satisfies Quanta’s standards for independence. The Board believes that the appointment of a Lead Director achieves many of the benefits claimed to result from the separation of the Chairman of the Board and the CEO roles. The Board reviews its leadership structure from time to time to assess whether it continues to serve the best interests of Quanta and its stockholders. The Board believes that this approach provides flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances, enabling the Board to fulfill its oversight role and allowing the Board to review the manner in which its leadership is configured with a view toward maintaining a structure that best serves Quanta and its stockholders.

Chairman of the Board

Quanta’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Board will appoint a Chairman of the Board, who may but need not be an employee of Quanta. The Chairman of the Board presides over all regular sessions of the Board and Quanta’s annual meetings of stockholders. With input from the CEO (if the Chairman is an independent director), or in consultation with the Lead Director (if the Chairman is not an independent director), the Chairman sets the agenda for Board meetings, subject to the right of each Board member to suggest the inclusion of item(s) on any agenda. The Chairman of the Board may vote at any meeting of the Board on any matter called to a vote, subject to the legal, fiduciary and governance requirements applicable to all members of the Board. If the Chairman of the Board is an independent director, the duties and responsibilities of the Chairman of the Board generally include the following:

 

working with the CEO to ensure directors receive timely, accurate, and complete information to enable sound decision making, effective monitoring and advice;

 

encouraging active engagement of all directors;

 

directing discussions toward a consensus view and summarizing discussions for a complete understanding of what has been agreed;

 

encouraging the Board’s involvement in strategic planning and monitoring the CEO’s implementation;

 

coordinating, monitoring and maintaining a record of all meetings of independent directors and discussing Board executive session results with the CEO;

 

promoting effective relationships and open communication between the independent directors and the management team;

 

coordinating, together with the Compensation Committee, the formal evaluation of the CEO on an annual basis;

 

coordinating, together with the Governance and Nominating Committee, the succession plans for the CEO;

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

13


Corporate Governance

 

identifying matters specifically reserved for the decision of the Board and ensuring that the Board sets appropriate levels of authority for management;

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

13


Corporate Governance

 

coordinating, together with the Governance and Nominating Committee, a process for the annual evaluation of the Board, its members and its committees; and

 

reviewing management’s investor relations strategy and participating, where appropriate, in its implementation.

Additional duties and responsibilities of the Chairman of the Board may be established from time to time by the Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board.

In May 2014, the Board re-appointed Bruce Ranck, an independent director, as non-executive Chairman of the Board to serve as such until his successor is duly elected and qualified at the next annual meeting of the Board or until his earlier resignation or removal. Mr. Ranck has served as Quanta’s non-executive Chairman of the Board since his initial appointment in May 2013. The Board may modify this structure in the future to ensure that the Board leadership structure for Quanta remains effective and advances the best interests of our stockholders.

Lead Director

In the event the Chairman of the Board is not an independent director, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that a Lead Director will be elected exclusively by the independent directors. The Lead Director must be an independent director and will assist the Chairman of the Board and the remainder of the Board in assuring effective corporate governance in managing the affairs of the Board. A Lead Director is responsible for ensuring that the quality, quantity and timeliness of the flow of information between management and the Company and the Board enables the Board to fulfill its functions and fiduciary duties in an efficient and effective manner. In addition, the Lead Director will coordinate the activities of the other independent directors, preside over the Board when the Chairman of the Board is not present, consult with the Chairman of the Board as to agenda items for Board and committee meetings, and perform such other duties and responsibilities as the Board deems appropriate.

Board Leadership in 2013

Mr. Colson, Quanta’s founder and former Chief Executive Officer, served as Executive Chairman from May 2011 to May 2013. The Board believed that Quanta’s Executive Chairman was well suited to serve as Chairman of the Board because, as an executive officer, he possessed detailed and in-depth knowledge of the issues, opportunities and challenges facing Quanta and its business and was thus well positioned to develop agendas that ensure that the Board’s time and attention are focused on the most critical matters. The Board further believed that it employed sound counter-balancing measures to ensure that Quanta maintained high standards of corporate governance and proper independent oversight.

Given that the Executive Chairman was not independent under the categorical standards for director independence set forth in Quanta’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the independent members of the Board designated Vincent D. Foster as Lead Director. Mr. Foster served as Lead Director through May 2013.

Upon Mr. Colson’s retirement from the Company and the Board in May 2013, the Board appointed Bruce Ranck, an independent director, as non-executive Chairman of the Board. The Board may modify this structure in the future to ensure that the Board leadership structure for Quanta remains effective and advances the best interests of our stockholders.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board oversees an enterprise-wide approach to risk management, designed to support the achievement of long-term organizational objectives and enhance stockholder value. The annual enterprise risk management assessment, led by Quanta’s President and Chief Executive Officer, provides visibility to the Board about the identification, assessment and management of critical risks and management’s risk mitigation strategies. In this process, risk is assessed throughout the business, including operational, financial, legal, regulatory, strategic and reputational risks. A fundamental part of risk management is not only understanding the risks a company faces and what steps management is taking to manage those risks, but also understanding what level of risk is appropriate for the company. The involvement of the full Board in setting Quanta’s business strategy, both short-term and long-term, is a key part of its understanding of Quanta’s risks and what constitutes an appropriate level of risk for Quanta as well as how such risks are managed.

While the Board has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, various committees of the Board also have responsibility for risk management. Specifically, the Audit Committee focuses on risks relating to

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

14


Corporate Governance

financial reporting, internal controls and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. In addition, the Compensation Committee focuses on risks relating to Quanta’s compensation policies and programs and, in setting compensation, strives to create incentives that are aligned with Quanta’s

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

14


Corporate Governance

risk management profile. Quanta’s Governance and Nominating Committee focuses on risks relating to Quanta’s corporate governance and Board membership and structure and also conducts an annual assessment of the risk management process and reports its findings to the Board. Finally, Quanta’s Investment Committee focuses on risks associated with prospective acquisitions, dispositions and investments, as well as capital investment strategies.

Board Independence

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board is composed of ten directors. The Board has determined that Messrs. Ball, Conaway, Foster, Fried, Golm, Jackman, Ranck and Wood and Ms. Shannon have no material relationship with Quanta (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with Quanta) and are “independent” within the meaning of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards. The Board has made this determination based in part on its finding that these independent directors meet the categorical standards for director independence set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and in the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which include our categorical standards for director independence, are posted on our website atwww.quantaservices.com under the heading “Investors & Media / Corporate Governance.” With nine directors deemed independent, the Board maintains a percentage of independent directors serving on the Board substantially above the NYSE requirement that a majority of directors be independent.

Executive Sessions of Non-Management Directors

In accordance with the NYSE corporate governance listing standards, our non-management directors, each of whom is “independent” within the meaning of NYSE corporate governance listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines, meet in executive session without management at each regularly scheduled Board meeting.

Director Meetings

During the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, the Board held sixeight meetings. All directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and the committees of the Board, if any, on which they served during the periods for which they have served as a director. We encourage, but do not require, the members of the Board to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. Last year, ten continuingall directors and one retiring director attended the annual meeting of stockholders, and one retiring director did not attend.stockholders.

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

15


Corporate Governance

 

 

Committees of the Board

The Board has four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Investment Committee. The Board has examined the composition of each standing committee and has determined that each member of these committees is “independent” within the meaning of SEC regulations, NYSE corporate governance listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Each standing committee operates under a formal charter adopted by the Board that governs its responsibilities. The committee charters are posted on our website atwww.quantaservices.com under the heading “Investors & Media / Corporate Governance.” The current membership and the number of meetings held during the last fiscal year and the primary responsibilities of each standing committee are set forth below:

 

Audit Committee

Audit Committee

•         Monitoring the quality and integrity of Quanta’s financial statements

 

•         Appointing and compensating the independent registered public accounting firm

 

•         Considering the independence and assessing the qualifications of the independent registered public accounting firm

 

•         Reviewing the performance of Quanta’s internal audit function and the independent registered public accounting firm

Number of Meetings During 2013:2014:   8  15

Committee Members

 

  Committee Members:

Prior to May 22, 2014

After May 22, 2014
  James R. Ball (I)(F)


  J. Michal Conaway (I)(F)

  Bernard Fried (C)(I)(F)

  Worthing F. Jackman (I)(F)

  James R. Ball (I)(F)

  Vincent D. Foster (I)

  Bernard Fried (C)(I)(F)

  Worthing F. Jackman (I)(F)

Compensation Committee

•         Overseeing the administration of Quanta’s incentive compensation plans, including the issuance of awards pursuant to equity-based incentive plans

 

•         Reviewing and approving salaries, bonuses, equity-based awards and other compensation of all executive officers and other management of Quanta and its subsidiaries

 

•         Reviewing and approving executive officer employment agreements and other compensation arrangements

 

Number of Meetings During 2013:2014:   8  7

Committee Members

 

  Committee Members:

Prior to May 22, 2014

After May 22, 2014
Vincent D. Foster (I)


Louis C. Golm (C)(I)

Margaret B. Shannon (I)

Pat Wood, III (I)

Bernard Fried (I)

Louis C. Golm (C)(I)

Margaret B. Shannon (I)

Pat Wood, III (I)

 

 

(C)

Chairman of the Committee

(F)

Audit Committee Financial Expert within the meaning of SEC regulations, as determined by the Board

(I)

Independent within the meaning of SEC regulations, NYSE corporate governance listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

16


Corporate Governance

 

 

Governance and Nominating Committee

•         Developing, recommending and recommendingperiodically reviewing corporate governance principles applicable to the Board and Quanta

 

•         Establishing qualifications for membership on the Board and its committees and evaluating the structure of the Board

 

•         Making recommendations to the Board regarding persons to be nominated for election or re-election to the Board and appointment of directors to itsBoard committees

 

•         Evaluating policies regarding the recruitment of directors

 

•         Making recommendations to the Board regarding persons to be elected as executive officers byof Quanta and periodically reviewing the development of executive officers and succession planning

•         Making recommendations to the Board regarding compensation and benefits for non-employee directors

Number of Meetings
During 2013:2014: 
 6  

5
Committee Members

 Committee Members:

J. Michal Conaway (C)(I)

Louis C. Golm (I)

Margaret B. Shannon (I)

Pat Wood, III (I)

 

Investment Committee

•         Considering and approving certain acquisitions, investments and dispositions by Quanta, including the terms, transaction structure, and the form and amount of consideration

 

•         Evaluating certain capital expenditures by Quanta

 

•         Monitoring ongoing activities in connection with certain investments and acquisitions

 

•         Tracking certain completed acquisitions and investments

 

•         Conducting a qualitative and quantitative review of certain historical acquisitions

 

•         Assessing policies regarding transactions that hedge certain commodity, interest rate, currency and other business risks

Number of Meetings During 2013:2014:   6  7
Committee Members

 

Prior to May 22, 2014After May 22, 2014

 Committee Members:

James R. Ball (C)(I)

Vincent D. Foster (I)

Bernard Fried (I)

Worthing F. Jackman (I)

James R. Ball (C)(I)

J. Michal Conaway (I)

Vincent D. Foster (I)

Worthing F. Jackman (I)

 

 

 

(C)

Chairman of the Committee

(I)

Independent within the meaning of SEC regulations, NYSE corporate governance listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of the Compensation Committee served as an employee or officer of Quanta or any of its subsidiaries during 2013,2014, was formerly an officer of Quanta or any of its subsidiaries, or had any relationship with Quanta requiring disclosure herein as a related party transaction, except that Vincent D. Foster served as president of Quanta on an interim basis from December 1, 1997 to December 19, 1997.transaction. Additionally, no executive officers served on the compensation committee or as a director of another company, one of whose executive officers served on Quanta’s Compensation Committee or as a director of Quanta.

Code of Ethics and Business Conduct

The Board has adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that applies to all directors, officers and employees of Quanta and its subsidiaries, including the principal executive officer, principal financial officer and

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

17


Corporate Governance

principal accounting officer or controller. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is posted on our website at

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

17


Corporate Governance

www.quantaservices.com under the heading “Investors & Media / Corporate Governance.” We intend to post at the above location on our website any amendments or waivers to the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that are required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 5.05 of Form 8-K.

Communications with the Board

Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with one or more of our directors, including our non-management directors or independent directors as a group, a committee or the full Board by writing to Corporate Secretary, Quanta Services, Inc., 2800 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 2600, Houston, Texas 77056. All communications will be reviewed by the Corporate Secretary and forwarded to one or more of our directors, as appropriate.

Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Director

The Governance and Nominating Committee regularly evaluates the appropriate size of the Board and whether any vacancies on the Board are expected due to retirement or otherwise. In the event that vacancies are anticipated or otherwise arise, the Governance and Nominating Committee will consider candidates for Board membership suggested by incumbent directors, management, third-party search firms and others. The Governance and Nominating Committee will also consider director nominations by stockholders that are made in compliance with the notice provisions and procedures set forth in our bylaws. For a discussion of these requirements, see “Additional Information Stockholder Proposals and Nomination of Directors for the 20152016 Annual MeetingMeeting..” All applications, recommendations or proposed nominations for Board membership received by Quanta will be referred to the Governance and Nominating Committee. The manner in which the Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates the qualifications of a nominee for director does not differ if the nominee is recommended by a stockholder.

The Governance and Nominating Committee has the authority to retain, at Quanta’s expense, a third-party search firm to help identify and facilitate the screening and interview process of potential director nominees, including screening candidates, conductingand the third-party firm may, among other things, conduct reference checks, preparingprepare a biography of each candidate for the Governance and Nominating Committee to review and helpinghelp coordinate interviews.

Once the Governance and Nominating Committee has identified a potential director nominee, the committee makes an initial determination as to whether to conduct a full evaluation of the candidate. This initial determination is based on whatever information is provided to the committee with the recommendation of the candidate, as well as the committee’s own knowledge of the candidate, which may be supplemented by inquiries to the person making the recommendation or others. The committee also may engage a third party to conduct a background check of the candidate. If the committee determines to further pursue the candidate, the committee then will evaluate the extent to which the candidate meets the Board membership qualifications described in “Director Qualifications” below.

In addition, the Governance and Nominating Committee considers other relevant factors it deems appropriate, including the current composition of the Board (including its diversity in experience, background, gender and ethnicity), the balance of management and independent directors, the need for a certain Board committee expertise, and the nature and extent of a candidate’s activities unrelated to Quanta, including service as a director on the boards of other public companies. In connection with this evaluation, the committee determines whether to interview the candidate, and, if warranted, the committee interviews the candidate in person or by telephone. The committee may also ask the candidate to meet with members of Quanta’s management or other Board members. After completing this evaluation, if the committee believes the candidate would be a valuable addition to the Board, it will recommend to the Board the candidate’s nomination for appointment or election as a director.

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

18


Corporate Governance

Director Qualifications

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines contain Board membership qualifications that the Governance and Nominating Committee considers in selecting nominees for our Board. Pursuant to these qualifications, members of the

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

18


Corporate Governance

Board should possess the highest standards of personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, and be committed to representing the long-term interests of our stockholders. They must also have an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom, mature judgment, the willingness to speak their mind and the ability to challenge and stimulate management in a constructive manner. In addition, Board members should have diverse experience at policy-making levels that may include business, government, education, technology or non-profit organizations, as well as experience in areas that are relevant to our business. Further, they should have demonstrated leadership skills in the organizations with which they are or have been affiliated.

Members of the Board must also be willing to devote sufficient time to carrying out their duties and responsibilities effectively and should be committed to serve on the Board for an extended period of time. As such, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that Board members should not serve on more than three additional public company boards, and Board members that are chief executive officers (or hold an equivalent position) with another public company should not serve on more than one public company board in addition to Quanta’s Board and their own company board. Board members will not be nominated for election to the Board if the election would occur after their 73rd birthday; however, the full Board may make exceptions to the mandatory retirement age in special circumstances. In February 2015, the Governance and Nominating Committee considered the nomination of Mr. Golm for election to the Board after his 73rd birthday, concluding that he continued to meet all of the other qualifications described above and that his continued service on the Board and the Compensation Committee would help facilitate oversight of Quanta’s new executive compensation incentive plans and ensure a smooth transition of the chairmanship of the Compensation Committee. Accordingly, the Governance and Nominating Committee recommended to the Board that Mr. Golm be nominated for election as a director at the 2015 annual meeting. After considering such recommendation and its reasoning, the Board granted an exception to the mandatory retirement age for Mr. Golm in February 2015.

The Governance and Nominating Committee also seeks directors representing a broad range of viewpoints and diverse backgrounds, including women and minorities that meet the above qualifications.

Director Compensation

The Governance and Nominating Committee has the responsibility of recommending to the Board compensation and benefits for non-employee directors. The committee is guided by certain director compensation principles set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Directors who also are employees of Quanta or any of its subsidiaries do not receive additional compensation for serving as directors. As employees of Quanta, John R. Colson, former Executive Chairman, and James F. O’Neil III, President and Chief Executive Officer, received no compensation for their services as directors of Quanta. The compensation received by Messrs. Colson and O’Neil as employees of Quanta is set forth in the 2013 Summary Compensation Table.

Historical Director Compensation

Pursuant to the director compensation arrangement in effect until May 23, 2013, each non-employee director received a fee for attendance at each meeting of the Board or any committee according to the following schedule: $2,000 for attendance at a board meeting in person; $1,000 for attendance at a board meeting by telephone; $1,000 for attendance at a committee meeting in person; and $500 for attendance at a committee meeting by telephone. Upon initial election to the Board at an annual meeting of stockholders, each such initially elected non-employee director received a cash retainer payment of $50,000 and an award of shares of restricted stock having a value of $150,000. Such awards of restricted stock provided that, unless the director’s service was interrupted, the awards would vest over three years in equal annual installments, vest in full upon certain events, and be forfeited upon resignation or removal for cause. Upon initial appointment to the Board other than at an annual meeting of stockholders, for the period from the appointment through the end of the director service year during which the appointment is made, each such initially appointed non-employee director received a pro rata portion of both (i) a cash retainer payment of $50,000 and (ii) an award of shares of restricted stock having a value of $150,000. At every annual meeting of stockholders at which a non-employee director was re-elected or remained a director, each such re-elected or remaining non-employee director received an annual cash retainer payment of $50,000 and an annual award of shares of restricted stock having a value of $100,000.

In addition, at every annual meeting of the Board, the non-employee directors appointed to the following positions received the supplemental annual cash retainers set forth below; provided, however, that any individual who serves as both Lead Director and as a committee chairman receives only the supplemental annual cash retainer designated for the Lead Director:

Lead Director

$15,000

Chairman of the Audit Committee

$14,000

Chairman of the Compensation Committee

$10,000

Chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committee

$7,500

Chairman of the Investment Committee

$10,000

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

19


Corporate Governance

Directors were also reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board or the committees thereof, and for other expenses reasonably incurred in their capacity as directors of Quanta.

Changes in Director Compensation in 2013

During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Governance and Nominating Committee retained Deloitte Consulting LLP (“Deloitte”) to provide benchmarking data and review the competitiveness of Quanta’s non-employee director compensation. Deloitte examined director compensation data for the same peer group used for the named executive officer compensation review, namely eighteen companies similar to Quanta in terms of industry, revenue size and market capitalization, as well as director compensation survey data, and presented its findings and observations to the Board. Further information about the peer group is disclosed in“Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Compensation Philosophy and Process – Use of Compensation Benchmarking Studies.” Following this review, the Board approved an updated non-employee director compensation program in December 2012, effective as of May 23, 2013. Acknowledging Quanta’s significant growth over the past few years and its historical practice of adjusting director compensation only every two or three years, the Board elected to align non-employee director compensation to competitive peer group practices. Changes to non-employee director compensation were designed to eliminate and replace board meeting fees with a slight increase in the annual board membership cash retainer, eliminate and replace committee meeting fees with new annual committee membership cash retainers, adjust the Lead Director and committee chairmanship annual cash retainers, eliminate the restriction limiting compensation to a single leadership role, eliminate the first year premium for election to the Board in the annual equity grant, reduce the vesting period of the annual equity grant to one year, and increase the amount of the annual equity grant. In addition, the Board approved a deferred compensation plan for non-employee directors in 2013 to enable Quanta’s non-employee directors to defer receipt of some or all of their cash or equity-based compensation for serving on the Board. Further information about the plan is disclosed in“– Current Director Compensation – Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors.”

In May 2013, the Governance and Nominating Committee again reviewed director compensation in connection with the change in leadership structure of the Board. Deloitte examined compensation levels for the role of non-executive Chairman of the Board for peer group companies, for other companies similar in size to Quanta, and as reflected in survey data, and presented its findings and observations to the Board. Following this analysis, the Board further adjusted director compensation, effective as of May 23, 2013, to provide appropriate compensation for the significant responsibilities assumed by a non-executive Chairman of the Board.

Current Director Compensation

Effective May 23, 2013, at every annual meeting of stockholders at which a non-employee director is elected or re-elected, each such director will receivereceives (i) an annual award of restricted stock or RSUs having a value of $140,000 and (ii) the annual cash retainer(s) set forth below for board membership, committee membership, and board/committee leadership to which such non-employee director is appointed:

 

 Annual
        Membership        
Retainer
 Annual Retainer Supplement
    For Committee Chairmanship    
Annual Membership
Cash Retainer
Annual Cash Retainer Supplement
For Committee Chairmanship

Board of Directors

 $65,000 N/A$65,000N/A

Audit Committee

 $15,000 $15,000$15,000$15,000

Compensation Committee

 $10,000 $10,000$10,000$10,000

Governance and Nominating Committee

 $10,000 $10,000$10,000$10,000

Investment Committee

 $10,000 $10,000$10,000$10,000

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

19


Corporate Governance

Upon initial appointment to the Board other than at an annual meeting of stockholders, each such initially appointed non-employee director will receivereceives (for the period from the appointment through the end of the current director service year during which the appointment is made)year) a pro rata portion of suchthe equity award and applicable cash amounts.

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

20


Corporate Governance

AnyOur non-employee Chairman of the Board will receivereceives additional annual compensation in the amount of $163,800, of which 50% will beis payable in cash, and 50% will beis payable in restricted stock or RSUs. Upon the initial appointment asof a non-employee Chairman of the Board, other than immediately following the annual meeting of stockholders, such director will receivereceives (for the period from the appointment through the end of the current director service year during which the appointment is made)year) a pro rata portion of the additional annual compensation described above.compensation.

Unless the director’s Board service is terminated earlier, terminated, restricted stock or RSUs awarded to non-employee directors willgenerally vest on May 28thshortly after conclusion of the year following the date of grant.director service year. Subject to the terms of applicable award agreements, unvested restricted stock or RSUs held by (i) any non-employee director who is not nominated for or elected to a new term, including for example, due to a reduction in the size of the Board, age precluding a re-nomination, the identification of a new nominee, or the desire to retire at the end of a term, or (ii) any non-employee director who resigns at Quanta’s convenience, including any resignation resulting from the non-employee director’s failure to receive a majority of the votes cast in an election for directors as required by Quanta’s Bylaws, will vest in full on the earlier of (a) May 28th following conclusion of the director service year, following the date of grant, or (b) the date of such non-employee director’s termination of service. RSUs granted to non-employee directors are settled in shares of Quanta Common Stock.

Generally, meeting fees willare not be paid. However, in order to compensate for the time required to accommodate extraordinary meeting activity, each non-employee director (or committee member, as applicable) will receivereceives a fee for attendance at the tenth and any subsequent meeting of the Board or the tenth and any subsequent meeting of such committee, in each case during a single director service year, as follows: $2,000 for attendance at a board meeting in person; $1,000 for participation at a board meeting by telephone; $1,000 for attendance at a committee meeting in person; and $500 for participation at a committee meeting by telephone. Additionally, during 2014 the Board approved a special one-time $25,000 payment to Mr. Fried in recognition of the significant incremental time and effort required as chairman of our Audit Committee during 2014.

Directors are also reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred to attend meetings of the Board or the committees thereof, and for other expenses reasonably incurred in their capacity as directors of Quanta. Directors who also are employees of Quanta or any of its subsidiaries do not receive additional compensation for serving as directors. Currently, nine non-employee director nominees are standing for election at the annual meeting. As President and Chief Executive Officer of Quanta, James F. O’Neil III received no compensation for his service as a director of Quanta. The compensation received by Mr. O’Neil as an employee of Quanta is set forth in the 2014 Summary Compensation Table.

Prospective Changes in Director Compensation

During the fourth quarter of 2014, the Governance and Nominating Committee retained Deloitte Consulting LLP (“Deloitte”) to, among other things, review Quanta’s non-employee director compensation, provide observations and recommendations regarding Quanta’s non-employee director compensation program, and highlight relevant trends in director compensation. Deloitte examined director compensation data for the same peer group used for the named executive officer compensation review, namely 17 companies similar to Quanta in terms of industry, revenue size and market capitalization, as well as director compensation survey data, and presented its findings and observations to the Governance and Nominating Committee. Further information about the peer group is disclosed in“Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Compensation Philosophy and Process – Role of Compensation Consultant.” 

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

20


Corporate Governance

In March 2015, after review of the information presented by Deloitte and upon recommendation by the Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board approved the following changes to the non-employee director compensation program, effective as of May 21, 2015, in order to better align with competitive peer group practices:

increased the annual Board membership retainer from $65,000 to $75,000;

increased the annual Compensation Committee chairmanship retainer from $10,000 to $15,000; and

increased the additional annual compensation for a non-executive Chairman of the Board from $163,800 to $180,000.

Additionally, upon recommendation by the Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board approved revised settlement terms for RSU awards to non-employee directors. Specifically, non-employee directors may elect to settle up to 50% of any RSU award in cash if the non-employee director is in compliance with Quanta’s stock ownership guidelines as of the date of settlement and is expected to remain in compliance immediately following settlement.

Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors

Non-employee directors are eligible to participate in a deferred compensation plan maintained by Quanta. The deferred compensation plan allowsNo later than December 31 of each year, each non-employee directorsdirector may voluntarily elect to defer receiptall or a portion (in 5% increments) of up to 100% of thehis or her annual cash retainers, including but not limited to, compensation for board membership, committee membership and RSU awardsboard/committee leadership, and RSUs to allocate deferredbe earned with respect to services performed in the following year. Deferral elections are irrevocable and if no deferral election is made, no compensation is deferred.

Deferred cash amounts are allocated to a separate recordkeeping account maintained for the non-employee director that reflects the amounts deferred and any earnings (positive or negative). The account is credited with returns according to the performance of the deemed investment choices selected by the non-employee director from time to time, from among the deemed investment choices made available by Quanta. However, Quanta has no obligation to provide any deemed investment choice other than a groupcash account deemed invested in cash equivalents based on the mid-term annual applicable federal rate, as adjusted on the first day of notional accounts that mirror the gains and/or losses of various investment funds.each subsequent year. The interest rate earned on the deferred cash amounts is not above-market or preferential. Deferred RSUs are recorded in an account maintained for the non-employee director that are deferred may be settled in Quanta common stock. reflects the number of shares deferred.

In general, deferred amounts arecompensation is distributed to the participantnon-employee director (or his or her beneficiary) upon the director leaving the Board or at a specific date as elected in advance by the participant.director. Additionally, deferred amounts can be distributed upon certain unforeseen emergencies suffered by the non-employee director or upon a change in control of Quanta.

Messrs. Ball, Foster, Fried and Golm elected to defer all or a portion of their cash compensation during 2014. Messrs. Ball, Conaway, Foster, Fried, Golm, Jackman and Wood elected to defer compensationall or a portion of their RSU awards during 2013.2014.

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

21


Corporate Governance

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Non-Employee Directors

Non-employee directors are required to hold stock with a value equivalent to five times the annual cash retainer for Board membership (excluding the annual cash retainer for committee membership or any supplement for serving as a committee chairman or as chairman of the Board). Non-employee directors have five years from the fiscal year-end following initial election to the Board to accumulate the stock ownership prescribed by the guidelines. As of December 31, 2013,2014, all non-employee directors met the requirements of the Company’s stock ownership guidelines, as Ms. Shannon, who was initially elected to the Board in 2012, is expected to exceed the prescribed ownership within five years of initial election as a director, and all remaining non-employee directors exceeded the ownership level prescribed by the stock ownership guidelines.

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

21


Corporate Governance

20132014 Director Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the compensation for each non-employee director during the 20132014 fiscal year.

 

Name

 Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
        ($)         
 Stock
Awards
      ($)(1)      
 Option
Awards
        ($)        
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
            ($)            
 Change in
Pension Value  and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
 All Other
Compensation
            ($)             
 Total
        ($)        
 Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
    ($)    
 Stock
Awards(1)
    ($)    
 Option
Awards
    ($)    
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
    ($)    
 Change in
Pension Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
     ($)    
 All Other
Compensation
    ($)    
 Total
    ($)    
 

James R. Ball

  111,000     141,959     —     —     —     —     252,959    101,000   135,564   —    —    —    —    236,564  

J. Michal Conaway

  112,500     141,959     —     —     —     —     254,459    95,000   135,564   —    —    —    —    230,564  

Ralph R. DiSibio (2)

  3,000     —     —     —     —     —     3,000   

Vincent D. Foster

  97,000     141,959     —     —     —     —     238,959    91,000   135,564   —    —    —    —    226,564  

Bernard Fried

  116,000     141,959     —     —     —     —     257,959   

Bernard Fried(2)

 131,000   135,564   —    —    —    —    266,564  

Louis C. Golm

  108,500     141,959     —     —     —     —     250,459    95,000   135,564   —    —    —    —    230,564  

Worthing F. Jackman

  100,000     141,959     —     —     —     —     241,959    91,000   135,564   —    —    —    —    226,564  

Bruce Ranck

  161,900     224,995     —     —     —     —     386,895    146,900   214,863   —    —    —    —    361,763  

Margaret B. Shannon

  94,000     141,959     —     —     —     —     235,959    85,000   135,564   —    —    —    —    220,564  

Pat Wood, III

  97,500     141,959     —     —     —     —     239,459    85,000   135,564   —    —    —    —    220,564  

 

(1)

The amounts shown under “Stock Awards” reflect the aggregate grant date fair value (based on the closing price of Quanta’s common stockCommon Stock on the date of grant) of RSUs granted during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013,2014, calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718. The value ultimately realized by the directordirectors upon the actual vesting of the award(s)awards may or may not be equal to this determined value. The average of the closing prices of Quanta’s common stockCommon Stock for the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of grant was used to determine the number of RSUs granted. As of December 31, 2013, Mr. DiSibio held no unvested awards,2014, Mr. Ranck held unvested awards covering 12,4058,026 shares, Ms. Shannon held unvested awards covering 6,6365,004 shares, and each of the remaining non-employee directors identified in the table above held unvested awards covering 9,5715,623 shares.

(2)

The amount shown under “Fees Earned or Paid in Cash” for Mr. DiSibio retired fromFried includes a special one-time $25,000 payment approved by the Board upon conclusionand paid in December 2014 in recognition of his termthe significant incremental time and effort required as a director on May 23, 2013. In accordance with the applicable award agreements, forfeiture restrictions lapsed and vesting was accelerated with respect to 9,545 shareschairman of unvested restricted stock, representing all unvested awards held by Mr. DiSibio as of May 23, 2013. The market value of Quanta’s common stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $29.40 per share.our Audit Committee during 2014.

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

22


Executive Officers

 

The current executive officers of Quanta are as follows:

 

Name

  Age  

Age

Position(s) with Quanta

James F. O’Neil III

56 55 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.

45 44 

Chief Operating Officer

Derrick A. Jensen

44 43 

Chief Financial Officer

Jesse E. Morris

47 46 

Executive Vice President – Corporate Development

Eric B. BrownSteven J. Kemps

50 63 

Executive Vice President and General Counsel

Dale L. Querrey

50 President – Electric Power

Nicholas M. Grindstaff

52 51 

Vice President – Finance and Treasurer

Peter B. O’Brien

45 44 

Vice President – Mergers and Acquisitions

Dorothy Upperman

52 Vice President – Tax

Wilson M. Yancey, Jr.

70 69 

Vice President – Health/Safety and Environmental

For a description of the business background of Mr. O’Neil, see“Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors” above.

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr. has served as our Chief Operating Officer since January 2013. He previously served as President of the Electric Power Division and Natural Gas and Pipeline Division from May 2011 to December 2012 and had responsibility for oversight of power and pipeline operations since January 2011. He served as President of the Natural Gas and Pipeline Division from October 2009 to May 2011 and as President of North Houston Pole Line, L.P., an electric and natural gas specialty contractor and now a subsidiary of Quanta, from 2001 until September 2009. He is currently a director of the Southwest Line Chapter of NECA. Mr. Austin holds a Bachelor of Arts in Business Management degree.

Derrick A. Jensen has served as our Chief Financial Officer since May 2012. He previously served as our Senior Vice President – Finance, Administration and Chief Accounting Officer from March 2011 to May 2012, as our Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer from March 1999 to March 2011, and as our Controller from December 1997 until March 2009. Mr. Jensen holds a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration degree in Accounting and became a Certified Public Accountant in the State of Texas in 1997.

Jesse E. Morris has served as our Executive Vice President – Corporate Development since January 2014. He previously served in various roles with Sysco Corporation, including Vice President and Chief Financial Officer – Foodservice Operations from September 2013 to December 2013, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer – Broadline Operations from February 2012 to August 2013, Vice President, Business Process Management from May 2011 to January 2012, and Vice President, Business Transformation from January 2009 to April 2011. Mr. Morris holds a Bachelor of Business Administration in Finance and Accounting and a Masters in Professional Accounting.

Eric B. BrownSteven J. Kemps has served as our Executive Vice President and General Counsel since FebruarySeptember 2014. He was an independent consultantPrior to joining Quanta, he served as General Counsel for Hess Retail Corporation from September 20112013 to February 2014.September 2014 until it was sold to Marathon Petroleum. He previously served in various executive management roles with Transocean Ltd.,Dean Foods Company, including Executive Vice President, LegalGeneral Counsel and AdministrationCorporate Secretary from February 20112008 to August 2011,2013 and Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel from February 20012006 to February2008. Mr. Kemps held various legal positions with increasing responsibility at Kimberly-Clark Corporation from 1997 to 2006. From 1993 to 1997, he was an attorney with Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, and from 1991 to 1993, he served as a law clerk to Judge Paul A. Magnuson of the United States District Court, Minnesota. Mr. Kemps holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting and a Juris Doctorate degree, and he holds a Certified Public Accountant certificate.

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

23


Executive Officers

Dale L. Querreyhas served as our President – Electric Power since March 2015. He previously served as president of PAR Electrical Contractors, Inc. (PAR), a wholly owned subsidiary of Quanta, from January 2011 to March 2015, and in various other roles with Quanta and PAR from November 2004 to January 2011, including Chief Operating Officer of PAR from August 2008 to January 2011. Prior to joining Quanta, he served in various roles with ABB Inc. and its affiliates, including Vice President and General Counselof Operations from February 1995April 2002 to February 2001.October 2004. Mr. BrownQuerrey holds a Juris DoctorateBachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering degree and a Master of Science in Electrical Engineering degree.

Nicholas M. Grindstaff has served as our Vice President – Finance since May 2011 and our Treasurer since October 1999. He previously served as a Vice President from March 2010 to May 2011 and as Assistant Treasurer from March 1999 until September 1999. Mr. Grindstaff holds a Master of Science in Accounting degree.

Peter B. O’Brien has served as our Vice President – Mergers and Acquisitions since January 2014. He previously served as Vice President – Tax from May 2012 to January 2014 and as Tax Director from June 2000 to May 2012. Mr. O’Brien holds a Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting degree and a Master in Professional Accounting degree and became a Certified Public Accountant in the State of Texas in 1995.

Dorothy Upperman has served as our Vice President – Tax since October 2014. She previously served in various tax management roles with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., including Sr. Director, Income Tax from 2008 to October 2014 and Director of Federal Audits & SOX Controls from 2007 to 2008. From 1998 to 2004, Ms. Upperman held various positions with Ernst & Young, LLP, most recently serving as Sr. Manager. Ms. Upperman holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting and is a Certified Public Accountant in the State of Texas.

Wilson M. Yancey, Jr. has served as our Vice President – Health/Safety and Environmental since April 2010. He previously served as Quanta’s Director of Health/Safety and Environmental from June 1999 to April 2010. Mr. Yancey holds a Bachelor of Science in Business Management and has over thirty years of experience as a safety professional.

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

23

24


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

 

Executive Summary

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) describes Quanta’s executive compensation program for 2013.2014. We use this program to attract, motivate and retain the employees who lead our business. In particular, this CD&Asection explains how the Compensation Committee made its compensation decisions for our named executive officers, or NEOs, for 20132014 and describes how this compensation fits within the Compensation Committee’s guiding principles with respect to NEO compensation.

Named Executive Officers

Our NEOs for 20132014 include five executive officers who are sometimes referred to herein as “continuing NEOs,” as well as twoone former executive officers,officer, as follows:

 

Name

Position(s) with Quanta

James. F. O’Neil III

President and Chief Executive Officer

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.

Chief Operating Officer

Derrick A. Jensen

Chief Financial Officer

Jesse E. Morris

Executive Vice President – Corporate Development

Steven J. Kemps

Executive Vice President and General Counsel

Eric B. Brown

Former Vice President and General Counsel

James F. O’Neil III, President2014 Business Highlights and Chief Executive Officer;

John R. Colson, our former Executive Chairman;

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr., Chief Operating Officer;

James H. Haddox, our former Executive Vice President;

Derrick A. Jensen, Chief Financial Officer;

Nicholas M. Grindstaff, Vice President – Finance and Treasurer; and

Peter B. O’Brien, Vice President – Mergers and Acquisitions.

2013 Business and Performance HighlightsOverall Compensation Decisions

Overall, the Compensation Committee believes that the total compensation paid to Quanta’s operational performanceNEOs in 2013 was strong2014 is reasonable and marked aappropriate. Quanta completed another successful year in which2014 despite continuing to operate in a challenging business environment. Notably, Quanta achieved the Company achieved many milestones. These successes were achieved even though the industriesfollowing in which we operate faced an uncertain business environment during 2013, with gradual improvement in the economy, yet continuing uncertainty in the marketplace due in part to stringent regulatory and environmental requirements impacting project implementation and infrastructure expansion. Listed below are some of Quanta’s notable accomplishments:2014:

 

In 2013, Quanta generated record revenues of $6.5$7.85 billion, driven by organic revenue growth plus the contribution from companies that we acquired during the year.year;

 

Operating income grew 13% year-over-year to a record $526.9 milliongenerated nearly 17% revenue growth in 2013,the electric power infrastructure segment and operating income margin improved to 8.1%.31% revenue growth in the oil and gas infrastructure segment;

 

Quanta’s 2013 year-endachieved record backlog of $8.73$9.76 billion set a new record, improving nearly 25% over the backlog levels achieved at year-end 2012.2014, an increase of approximately 12% from year-end 2013;

 

Quanta’s man-hours worked increased 18%established programs to improve safety, leadership development, operational performance standards and results;

completed nine acquisitions, significantly enhancing our electric power infrastructure and oil and gas infrastructure service offerings in the United States and Canada and expanding our capabilities in Australia to include electric power service offerings; and

was awarded the two largest electric transmission projects in the history of the company.

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

25


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

However, despite these accomplishments, the level of achievement for the 2014 company performance metrics failed to reach target levels and fell below the achievement level attained for the 2013 performance year. As a result, with respect to all NEOs, total cash compensation paid for the 2014 performance year was below target cash compensation, and with respect to the three NEOs who were also NEOs in 2013, total cash compensation paid for the 2014 performance year decreased as compared to the 2013 performance year. The following table details the decrease in cash awards and total cash compensation for these three NEOs:

Named Executive Officer

2013 Cash
Incentive Award(1)
2014 Cash
Incentive Award(2)
  Decrease  2013
Total Cash
Compensation(3)
2014
Total Cash
Compensation(3)
  Decrease   

Mr. O’Neil

 $    1,748,000    $    775,885    55.6 $    2,666,750    $    1,763,385    33.9

Mr. Austin

 $1,334,000   $564,280   57.7 $2,027,750   $1,345,530   33.6

Mr. Jensen

 $828,000   $384,093   53.6 $1,308,000   $921,593   29.5

(1)

The amounts shown reflect cash bonuses awarded to each NEO under the 2013 annual incentive plan.

(2)

The amounts shown reflect cash bonuses awarded to each NEO under the 2014 annual incentive plan.

(3)

The amounts shown reflect, for the applicable year, base salary paid and cash bonuses awarded to each NEO.

Furthermore, while we increased the target dollar amount of the long-term equity incentives awarded to our safety incident rates continuedNEOs under our redesigned 2014 long-term incentive plan, 50% of those awards are subject to trend downwardcompany performance conditions that have yet to be evaluated and remain belowsubject to a 3-year performance period ending December 31, 2016. The remaining 50% of the industry average.awards vest over a 3-year period and are designed to promote retention of our NEOs.

The transition to our redesigned long-term equity awards also resulted in 2014 reportable compensation for Messrs. O’Neil, Austin and Jensen under both the 2014 long-term incentive plan and the 2013 supplemental incentive plan. Recognizing that awards were made under multiple plans and that the aggregate amount of equity awards granted to these NEOs in 2014 is attributable to multiple performance periods and therefore appears higher than prior years, we have provided further explanation of the transitional disclosure implications and the resulting increase in reportable compensation in “Changes in Executive Compensation HighlightsImplemented for 2014 – Recognition of Transitional Disclosure Implications Associated with Changes Implemented” below.

Say-on-Pay and Executive Compensation Changes

At Quanta’s 20132014 annual meeting of stockholders, over 98% of our stockholders voting on the “say-on-pay” proposal approved the compensation of our NEOs as described in our 20132014 proxy statement. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee did not implement changes to our executive compensation program as a result of the stockholder advisory vote, butvote. However, the Compensation Committee has continueddid implement certain changes to evaluate and adjust Quanta’s compensation program beginning in 2014 based on the comprehensive review of our executive compensation program.program that began in 2012, with the goal of identifying changes to ensure that our incentive compensation remains consistent with Quanta’s guiding principles on executive compensation. SeeChanges to 2014Executive Compensation Program”Implemented for 2014 for additional information about prospective changesthese changes.

As Quanta moves forward into 2015, the Compensation Committee is aware of the difficult business environment, the continuing uncertainty in the marketplace, and the resulting challenges with respect to Quanta’s compensation program.executive compensation. The Compensation Committee will continuemonitors trends and developments to workensure that Quanta provides the appropriate executive compensation incentives to remain competitively positioned to attract and retain executive talent and to ensure that management’s interests are aligned with our stockholders’ interests to support long-term value creation.creation, while not encouraging excessive risk-taking.

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

24

26


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

 

 

Good Governance and Best Practices

We are committed to strong governance standards that ensure our executive compensation programs are closely aligned with the interests of our stockholders, as evidenced by the policies and practices described below:

 

We maintain meaningful stock ownership guidelines that align our executives’ long-term interests with those of our stockholders and discourage excessive risk-taking.

 

We eliminatedOur employment agreements with NEOs do not provide for gross-ups of excise taxes on severance or other payments in connection with a change of control for NEOs for whom employment agreements were entered into after 2010.control.

 

We have a “clawback” policy that permits our Board to recover from our NEOs cash or equity incentive compensation in certain circumstances.

 

We have a policy that prohibits directors and executive officers from pledging Quanta securities as collateral for a loan absent pre-clearance and demonstration of financial capacity to repay without resorting to the pledged securities.

We have a policy that prohibits directors and executive officers from hedging the economic risk of ownership of Quanta common stock.Common Stock.

 

Our Compensation Committee has engaged its own independent compensation consultant, who performs an annual comprehensive market analysis of our executive compensation programs and pay levels.

 

We provide our stockholders with an annual opportunity to participate in an advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs.

How Our Performance is Linked to Pay

Quanta’s NEO compensation is primarily comprised of base salary, annual short-term incentives and long-term incentives. Our compensation philosophy links executive compensation to both individual and company performance. Base salaries are generally targeted at or near the median of our competitive market. Target annual incentives reflect competitive market levels and practices, with upside opportunity for performance above company and individual performance target levels. Target award levels are designed to achieve total cash compensation slightly above the market median for superior performance, and performance measures are chosen to align the interests of executives with stockholders. Finally, long-term incentives, typically paid with equity, are designed to focus executives on the long-term financial performance of the company, along with achievement of certain strategic objectives.initiatives.

The Compensation Committee desires to provide target total direct compensation for each NEO within +/+/-20% of the median for comparable officers in our peer group. Additionally, the Compensation Committee believes that a significant portion of the target compensation of the NEOs should be performance-based and, therefore, at risk.

Approximately 80% With respect to our continuing NEOs, all of the target compensation in 2013 forshort-term cash incentive and half of the Chief Executive Officerlong-term equity incentive associated with the 2014 annual and long-term incentive plans was “at risk” performance-based compensation, variable based on the level of performance against incentive targets pursuant to the compensation plans described below, with 60% of the total target compensation mix in equity awards.

Approximately 59%, on average, of target compensation in 2013 for the other continuing NEOs was “at risk” compensation contingent upon performance outcomes, with the 32% of the total target compensation mix in equity awards.

below.

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

25


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

The following graph reflects the mix of target compensation of our CEO and our other continuing NEOs in 2013:

NEO Target Compensation Mix

LOGO

The Compensation Committee believes that Quanta performed very well in 2013 under Mr. O’Neil’s leadership, achieving new records in revenues, operating income, earnings per share, backlog and safety performance, notwithstanding a challenging business environment during the year. The company short-term and long-term performance goals against which we measured performance were exceeded in 2013, resulting in above-target awards to each NEO. The Compensation Committee believes that the total direct compensation for 2013 for Quanta’s NEOs is reasonable and appropriate, considering that Quanta exceeded its financial performance goals and the individuals achieved substantially all of their individual strategic goals in 2013.

With increased incentive payouts for the 2013 performance year due to overall performance exceeding target, equity-basedEquity-based incentive awards for 2013under our 2014 long-term incentive plan represented a substantial portion of each NEO’s compensation as a percentage of total direct compensation (base salary, short-term cash incentive and long-term equity incentive).

The following graph sets forth the mix of actual total direct compensation of our CEO and our other continuing NEOs for the 2013 performance year, consisting of the 2013 base salary rate, short-term cash incentive awards pursuant to the annual incentive plan and the value of long-term equity incentive awards pursuant to the supplemental incentive plan for the 2013 performance year:

2013 NEO Total Direct Compensation Mix

LOGO

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

26


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

Equity-based awards will continue to play an important role in this challenging economic environment because they provide incentives for the creation of stockholder value and promote executive retention and an ownership culture. For our Chief Executive Officer, 64% of the total target compensation mix

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

27


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

under the 2014 annual and long-term incentive plans was payable in equity awards, and for our other continuing NEOs, on average 40% of the total target compensation mix was payable in equity awards. The Compensation Committee undertook a comprehensive reviewfollowing graph reflects the mix of target compensation of our executive compensation programCEO and our other continuing NEOs in 2013 with the goal of identifying and implementing prospective changes to ensure that our incentive compensation remains consistent with Quanta’s guiding principles on executive compensation. As a result of this review, the2014:

2014 NEO Target Compensation Committee decided to implement changes to our executive compensation program beginning in 2014, which are summarized below in“Changes to 2014 Compensation Program.” As Quanta moves forward into 2014, the Compensation Committee is aware of the difficult business environment, the continuing uncertainty in the marketplace, and the resulting challenges with respect to executive compensation. The Compensation Committee continues to monitor trends and developments to ensure that Quanta provides the appropriate executive compensation incentives and remains competitively positioned to attract and retain executive talent, while not encouraging excessive risk-taking by management.Mix

LOGO

Compensation Philosophy and Process

Overview

The Compensation Committee administers the compensation programs for all of our NEOs. As described above under “Corporate Governance – Committees of the Board, – Compensation Committee,” the Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee is “independent” within the meaning of SEC regulations, the NYSE corporate governance listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Compensation Committee’s guiding principles with respect to NEO compensation are:

 

to align our NEOs’ incentives with short-term and long-term stockholder value creation;

 

to attract, motivate and retain the best possible executive officer talent by maintaining competitive compensation programs;

 

to tie cash and stock incentives to the achievement of measurable company, business unit and individual performance goals that are associated with strategies intended to differentiate Quanta from its peers;

to tie stock incentives to the achievement of measurable company goals that are linked to our long-term strategic plans; and

 

to promote an ownership culture.

In the first quarter of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee determines the terms of our annual supplemental and discretionarylong-term incentive plans (each of which is described below) and establishes the current fiscal year’s company financial performance goals and individual strategic performance goalsmetrics that will be used in evaluating the performance of each NEO under such incentivethe plans. In addition, the Compensation Committee establishes prospective base salary rates and target incentive percentages and amounts for each NEO for the current fiscal year. The Compensation Committee also considers the parameters of our discretionary incentive plan (described below). Following the end of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee meets to discuss our prior year’s financial performance, to evaluate the performance of our NEOs relative to applicable performance goals,metrics, and to determine the amounts, if any, that will be awarded to each NEO under our annual, supplementallong-term and discretionary incentive plans for the prior fiscal year.

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

27


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

The Compensation Committee seeks to maintain the competitiveness of our executive compensation levels with those of our peers and competitors and considers various factors in determining overall compensation and the individual

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

28


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

components of compensation of each NEO, including (i) the results of compensation benchmarking studies which included an analysis of peer group and published compensation survey data,data; (ii) economic and market conditions,conditions; (iii) the effects of inflation,inflation; (iv) changes in our business operations,operations; (v) changes in the compensation practices of our competitors,competitors; (vi) the executive officer’s position, experience, length of service and performance,performance; (vii) company performanceperformance; and (viii) the judgment of each member of the Compensation Committee based upon prior experiences with executive compensation matters. The influence of these factors on NEO compensation is discussed further below.

UseRole of Compensation Benchmarking StudiesConsultant

One of the Compensation Committee’s guiding principles is to attract, motivate and retain the best possible executive officer talent, which is important to the success of our business. Consistent with this guiding principle, the Compensation Committee desires to provide target total direct compensation for our NEOs within +/-20% of the median for comparable officers in our peer group. To determine competitive market pay levels, the Compensation Committee utilizes a compensation benchmarking study which includes an analysis of peer group and published compensation survey data for our industry that is prepared and compiled for the committee by outside consultants. This data assists the Compensation Committee in establishing the overall compensation levels for our NEOs and determining the relative weighting of individual components of compensation.

Although the compensation benchmarking studies play an important role in establishing competitive compensation practices, the Compensation Committee uses such studies only as a point of reference and not as a determinative factor for our NEOs’ compensation. The compensation benchmarking studies do not supplant the significance of individual and company performance that the Compensation Committee considers when making compensation decisions. Because the information provided by a compensation benchmarking study is just one piece of information utilized in setting executive compensation, the Compensation Committee exercises discretion in determining the nature and extent of its use.

The Compensation Committee Charter grants to the Compensation Committee the authority to retain, at Quanta’s expense, advisorscompensation consultants, outside legal counsel and compensation consultantsother advisors, and to approve their compensation.fees. These advisors report directly to the Compensation Committee.

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

28


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

The Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2012, the Compensation Committee independently retained Deloitte to examine Quanta’s executive compensation program and pay practices, and to review the competitiveness of our executive compensation program relative to a public company peer group and survey data, inand to examine the fourth quarterdesign of 2012 (the “2012 Deloitte Compensation Benchmarking Study”)Quanta’s incentive plans for its NEOs. The benchmarking and again in the fourth quarter of 2013 (the “2013 Deloitte Compensation Benchmarking Study”). Both such benchmarkingdesign studies (collectively the “Deloitte Compensation Benchmarking Studies”) assessed Quanta’s executive compensation program and pay practices, taking into account our compensation strategy and business objectives, as well as market conventions and leading practices. Deloitte assembled a group ofutilized the following companies for the purpose of obtaining competitive data and, with input from our management and Compensation Committee approval, selected the following companies for inclusion in the Deloitte Compensation Benchmarking Studies:data:

 

•      AECOM Technology Corporation

•      KBR, Inc.

•      Baker Hughes Incorporated

•      MasTec, Inc.

•      Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V.

•      MYR Group Inc.

•      Emcor Group, Inc.

•      Oceaneering International, Inc.

•      Flowserve Corp.

•      Pike Electric Corporation

•      Fluor Corporation

•      Superior Energy Services, Inc.

•      FMC Technologies, Inc.

•      The Shaw Group Inc.(a)URS Corporation

•      Foster Wheeler AG

•      URS CorporationWeatherford International Ltd.

•      Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

•    Weatherford International Ltd.

(a)

Omitted from the 2013 Deloitte Compensation Benchmarking Study due to Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V.’s acquisition of The Shaw Group in 2013.

These companies were chosen based on (i) market competition, including companies that compete with Quanta for customers, executive talent and investors, (ii) organization size, with financial characteristics such as revenues or market capitalization similar to those of Quanta, and (iii) industry, including companies in the heavy construction industry and companies that serve oil and gas or power transmission companies. Based on projected 2012 revenues and market capitalization as of September 30, 2012, Quanta was positioned at the 50th percentile and 65th percentile, respectively, of the peer group for the 2012 Deloitte Compensation Benchmarking Study. Based on revenues for the trailing four quarters and market capitalization as of February 14, 2014, Quanta was positioned at the 44th percentile and 54th percentile, respectively, of the peer group for the 2013 Deloitte Compensation Benchmarking Study. The Compensation Committee may periodically update the companies in future compensation benchmarking studies as a result of mergers, acquisitions, new publicly traded companies and other changes, using the criteria outlined above.

The Deloitte Compensation Benchmarking Studies compared base salary, target total cash compensation, long termtarget annual and long-term incentive opportunity,opportunities, and target total direct compensation to market medians based on position as well as rank.medians. Deloitte also utilized several sources of published compensation survey data by matching, to the extent possible, with management’s input, the job titles and job descriptions of our certainresponsibilities of our NEOs with those in the surveys to provide additional competitive compensation information. Deloitte did not provide, nor was it asked by the Compensation Committee to provide, recommendations as to specific compensation payments to our NEOs. Deloitte reported directly to the Compensation Committee, but was authorized by the Compensation Committee to communicate with executive officers and personnel in the human resources department to obtain information.

During the first quarter of 2013,2014, the Compensation Committee referred to information reflectedDeloitte’s examination of our executive compensation program and pay practices and the competitiveness of our executive compensation program relative to a public company peer group and survey data (a “Deloitte Benchmarking Study”) in the 2012 Deloitte

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

29


Compensation Benchmarking Study in Discussion & Analysis

connection with approving prospective base salary rates and target incentive percentages and amounts for certain executive officers for the 2013 performance year.2014. Following the 20132014 fiscal year end, the Compensation Committee assessed company financial performance metrics and individual performance metrics, approving the payouts under our 2014 annual incentive plan, and referred to information reflected in the 2013a new Deloitte Compensation Benchmarking Study in connection with assessing performance against company financial performance goals and individual strategic goals, approving the payouts under our incentive plans relating to the 2013 performance year, and establishing prospective base salary rates and target incentive percentages and amounts for each NEO for 2014.under our 2015 incentive plans.

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

29


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

studies assist the Compensation Committee in establishing the overall compensation practices that are consistent with our philosophy and guiding principles on executive compensation described above. Although compensation studies provide important data for establishing our competitive compensation practices and compensation design, the Compensation Committee uses such studies only as a point of reference and not as a determinative factor for structuring and determining the amount of our NEOs’ compensation. The Compensation Committee also exercises discretion in its use of compensation studies, and the studies do not supplant the significance of individual and company performance that the Compensation Committee considers when making compensation decisions.

Management’s Role in the Compensation-Setting Process

Our Chief Executive Officer plays an important role in setting the compensation of our NEOs (other than with respect to himself and the former Executive Chairman)himself). Although our Chief Executive Officer, after taking into account input from other members of management, makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee has final authority and complete discretion in ultimately determining and setting NEO compensation plans, goals, incentive targets, salaries and cash and equity incentive awards.

In the first quarter of each fiscal year, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer meetmeets with the Compensation Committee to propose Quanta’s overall financial performance goalstargets and individual objectives for the incentive plans for the current fiscal year. The Compensation Committee reviews these financial goalsperformance targets and adjusts them as it deems appropriate. Each individual who is expected to be an NEO (other than the former Executive Chairman) also proposes his individual strategic goalsobjectives for the upcoming fiscal year to our Chief Executive Officer. Our Chief Executive Officer reviews and modifies the submitted strategic goals,individual objectives, as he deems appropriate, and submits them, together with his own proposed individual strategic goals and those of the Executive Chairman,objectives, to the Compensation Committee for its consideration. The Compensation Committee then reviews, modifies, as necessary, and approves each NEO’s strategic goalsindividual objectives for the current fiscal year. If, later during the year, it is determined that an individual who was not previously identified as a potential NEO will be an NEO, including if such individual is hired during the performance year, the Compensation Committee promptly reviews, modifies, as necessary, and approves the strategic goals of such individual.NEO’s individual objectives. The financial performance goalstargets and strategic goalsindividual objectives approved by the Compensation Committee for the 2013 performance year2014 incentive plans are discussed below inElements of Executive Compensation”Compensationand “ExecutiveExecutive Compensation Decisions for the 2013 Performance Year,2014. respectively.

Following the end of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee uses Quanta’s financial performance goals,targets, along with each NEO’s strategic goals,individual objectives, to determine payouts under our executive compensationincentive plans. At the request of the Compensation Committee, our Chief Executive Officer and certain other executive officers also participate in the Compensation Committee’s review. The subject NEO is not present during the Compensation Committee’s discussion of such NEO’s individual performance relative to his respective goalsindividual objectives and awards. Our Chief Executive Officer presents to the Compensation Committee his evaluation of the performance of the other NEOs, (other than the former Executive Chairman), taking into account each of their strategic goals,individual objectives, and his compensation recommendations as to each of them. The Compensation Committee considers these evaluations in determining payouts to be made, if any, pursuant to our incentive plans for the completed fiscal year under consideration, as well as salaries and incentive targets of the NEOs for the current fiscal year.

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

30


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

To assist the Compensation Committee as it makes its compensation decisions, management also provides detailed spreadsheets for the NEOs indicating, among other things:

the historical total direct compensation for NEOs, including base salary and cash and equity incentive awards, approved by the Compensation Committee for the NEOs under our incentive plans for the two years immediately preceding the completed fiscal year under consideration;

things, actual performance relative to company financial performance goalstargets and individual strategic goals for the NEOsobjectives for the completed fiscal year under consideration; and

the amounts of compensation that would be payable to each of our NEOs (other than as to himself and the former Executive Chairman) for the current fiscal year assuming target payouts under our incentive plans.

consideration. These spreadsheets combine severalthe elements of actual andthe targeted compensation, of our NEOs, so that the Compensation Committee may analyze both the individual compensation elements of compensation (including the compensation mix) and the total amount of actual and targeted compensation for each NEO for a particular performance year in connection with the Compensation Committee’s consideration of the factors influencing the various elements of NEO compensation.

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

30


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

2013 Compensation Committee Meetings

The Compensation Committee met a total of eight times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. The significant actions taken by the Compensation Committee with respect to executive compensation matters in 2013 include: (i) assessing performance against company financial performance goals and individual strategic goals and approving the payouts under our incentive plans relating to the 2012 performance year; (ii) approving prospective base salary rates and target incentive percentages and amounts for certain executive officers for the 2013 performance year; (iii) adopting our annual, supplemental and discretionary incentive plans for the 2013 performance year; (iv) approving the financial performance and individual strategic goals and related compensation targets for the 2013 performance year; (v) considering compensation matters associated with the retirement of our former Executive Chairman upon his retirement, including approving the acceleration of vesting with respect to outstanding restricted stock awards held by him; (vi) considering the results of the 2013 stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation; (vii) retaining Deloitte to conduct the 2013 Deloitte Compensation Benchmarking Study; (viii) reviewing Quanta’s executive compensation program and pay practices and considering alternative incentive plan designs for 2014; and (ix) evaluating the independence of compensation consultants retained by the Compensation Committee.

Consideration of Say-on-Pay Results

The Compensation Committee considered the results of the 20132014 advisory “say-on-pay” proposal in connection with the discharge of its responsibilities. Because over 98% of our stockholders voting on the “say-on-pay” proposal approved the compensation of our NEOs as described in our proxy statement in 2013,2014, the Compensation Committee did not implement changes to our executive compensation program as a result of the stockholder advisory vote, butvote. However, the Compensation Committee has continueddid implement certain changes to evaluate and adjust Quanta’s compensation program beginning in 2014, based on the comprehensive review of our executive compensation program.program that began in 2012, to ensure that our incentive compensation remained consistent with Quanta’s guiding principles on executive compensation. See“Changes to 2014Executive Compensation Program”Implemented for 2014” for additional information about prospective changes to Quanta’s compensation program.these changes.

Exercise of Discretion in Executive Compensation Decisions

The Compensation Committee has complete discretion to withhold payment pursuant to any of our incentive compensation plans irrespective of whether we or our NEOs have successfully met the goalsfinancial performance targets or individual objectives set under these plans. For example, awards earned pursuant to the annual incentive plan and supplementallong-term incentive plan described below are generally intended to qualify as performance-based compensation and are paid or issued as performance compensation awards under and subject to the terms of the Quanta Services, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”). The Compensation Committee may exercise negative discretion, as permitted by the incentive plans and the Omnibus Plan, to reduce incentive awards to amounts determined by the Committee to be appropriate.

“Clawback” Policy

The Compensation Committee adopted aA “clawback” policy, embodied in the 2014 annual and supplementallong-term incentive plans, for the 2013 performance year that permits the Compensation Committee to recover certain incentive compensation from executive officers and other key employees in accordance with applicable law where the payment was based upon the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a restatement. Based on its review and judgment, the Compensation Committee may seek to recover any amount that it determines was received inappropriately by these individuals.

Equity Award Grant Practices

The Compensation Committee meets in the first quarter of each fiscal year to, among other things, grant equity awards, including, as discussed above, equity awards to our NEOs. This meeting occurs after our earnings release for the fourth quarter of the prior fiscal year to allow the Compensation Committee to havereview complete financial results for the prior fiscal year at the time that it evaluates our performancewhen evaluating company and that of our NEOs.NEO performance. The Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, also grant awards throughout the year in connection with the hiring of a new executive officer or the promotion of an employee to an executive officer position. During 2014, the Compensation Committee granted (i) RSUs associated with the achievement of 2013 we granted equity awardsperformance goals, (ii) RSUs associated with 2013 special transaction bonuses, (iii) RSUs in connection with the hiring of Messrs. Morris, Kemps and Brown,

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

31


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

and (iv) performance units and time-vested RSUs pursuant to our 2014 long-term incentive plan, all of which are set forth in the form2014 Grants of performance-basedPlan-Based Awards Table.

All equity-based awards granted during 2014 pursuant to our incentive plans for executive officers were made under the Omnibus Plan. Generally, the number of RSUs usingand performance units we grant is determined by dividing the aggregate dollar amount intended to be awarded by the average of the closing prices of Quanta’s common stockCommon Stock for the twenty

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

31


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of grant for purposes of determining the number of shares subject togrant. RSUs with an aggregate value equal to the dollar amount to be awarded. Generally, our RSUsand performance units are to begenerally settled in stockour Common Stock upon vesting. It is not the intention of the Compensation Committee to time the granting of any awards under our incentive plans, including those made to newly hired or newly promoted executive officers, with the release of any material, non-public information.

Elements of Executive Compensation

The key components of our current compensation program for our NEOs are summarized in the table below. Each component of our compensation program has a critical role in creating compensation payouts that motivate and reward strong performance and retaining the NEOs who deliver such performance. The Compensation Committee considers each compensation component individually and all compensation components in the aggregate when making decisions regarding amounts that may be awarded under each other compensation component.

 

Compensation
Element
Form of
Compensation

Performance

Criteria

Purpose

Base Salary

CashIndividual performance and experience in the role are factors in determining base salaries.

To provide fixed compensation necessary to attract and retain key executives and to offset the cyclicality in our business that may impact variable pay year-to-year.

Short-Term Incentive

CashTied to the achievement of an annual operating income goal reviewed(1) adjusted organic earnings per share (“EPS”) growth target and approved(2) individual performance objectives, in each case established by the Compensation Committee.

To provide incentives to our employees to achieve financial performance goalstargets and individual objectives and to reward our employees for the achievement of those goals.

targets and objectives.

Long-Term Incentive

Performance units (50%)

Time-vested RSUs (50%)

Equity-based awardsTied

Performance units cliff-vest at the end of a 3-year performance period and are tied to the achievement of an annual return on equity3-year financial performance goaltargets and individual strategic goals reviewed and approvedinitiatives, in each case established by the Compensation Committee.

Time-vested RSUs vest over three years in equal annual installments.

To create a strong incentive for our key management members to achieve our short-long-term financial performance targets and long-term performance objectives, strategic plan and individual goals, andinitiatives, to align management’s interests with our stockholders’ interests.

interests, and to create an incentive for management to remain with Quanta.
Retirement Benefits

Other401(k) Matching

Non-Qualified Deferred

    Compensation Plan

401(k) MatchingN/ATo provide a competitive compensation package.

Perquisites

Executive Physical Program

Financial Planning Services

Corporate Housing

Relocation Package

N/A

To provide a competitive compensation package and, in certain cases, to optimize an executive officer’s time.

 

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

32


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

Changes to Executive Compensation DecisionsImplemented for the 2013 Performance Year2014

Comprehensive Review of Executive Compensation Program

The Compensation Committee previously undertook a comprehensive review of our executive compensation program in late 2012 with the goal of identifying and implementing prospective changes to ensure that our incentive compensation remains consistent with Quanta’s guiding principles on executive compensation. In accordance with the authority and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee as set forth in its charter, and reflecting on Quanta’s continued growth, the Compensation Committee focused on overall incentive plan design. In performing its review, the Compensation Committee considered input from Deloitte and senior management. As part of this review, Deloitte assessed Quanta’s executive compensation program and practices in comparison to Quanta’s compensation strategy, business objectives, market practices and leading practices. Deloitte’s observations regarding Quanta’s current executive compensation program, based on its review of Quanta’s public disclosures, Compensation Committee meeting materials, compensation plan documents, historical compensation awards, proxy advisory firm reports and discussions with key members of management and the Compensation Committee, were reflected in a report entitled 2012 Review of Current Executive Compensation Program and Practicesreport (the “2012 Deloitte Comprehensive Review”).

This effort focused on the more senior personnel within corporate management and operating unit management, while still allowing the Compensation Committee to exercise its authority on a summary level of aggregated amounts with respect to broader management groups. This initiative resulted in modification of the design of awards under the 2014 annual and long-term (formerly referred to as supplemental) incentive plans for Quanta’s senior leadership team, consisting of approximately 20 individuals, including the NEOs, other executive officers, corporate vice presidents and functional leads.

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

32

33


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

 

 

Summary of Changes Implemented for 2013

Based on the 2012 Deloitte Comprehensive Review, Deloitte’s report of Quanta’s competitiveness of our executive compensation program relative to a public company peer group and survey data in the fourth quarter of 2012 and information contained in the Deloitte Compensation Benchmarking Study,Studies, the Compensation Committee decided to implement certain changes to our executive compensation program beginning in 2014, which are described below and summarized in the following table.

Incentive Compensation for 2013

Incentive Compensation for 2014

Annual Incentive Plan

Senior Leadership
Annual Incentive Plan

Number of metrics

Single metricMultiple metrics

Metric No. 1

Operating income

Threshold payout equal to 25% of target incentive for performance at 75% of operating income goal; maximum payout equal to 200% of target incentive for performance at 125% or more of operating income goal

Adjusted organic EPS growth (65% of the award opportunity)

A cash payout begins to accrue if adjusted organic EPS is greater than the prior year baseline adjusted organic EPS

An award can range from 0% to 200% of the target incentive amount attributable to this metric based on achievement relative to a target amount of adjusted organic EPS growth

Exemplary Award

N/A

Participants are eligible for an exemplary award, payable in time-vested RSUs, if achievement of adjusted organic EPS growth exceeds the level that earns the maximum cash award

An exemplary award cannot exceed an incremental amount equal to 200% of the target incentive amount

Metric No. 2

N/A

Individual performance objectives (35% of the award opportunity)

An award can range from 0% to 200% of the target incentive amount attributable to this metric based on achievement of the individual performance objectives

Payout currency

Cash

Cash

RSUs if an exemplary award is earned

Supplemental Incentive Plan

Senior Leadership
Long-Term Incentive Plan

Number of equity vehicles

Single vehicleTwo vehicles

Performance Units

N/A

50% of the long-term incentive target amount is awarded in unearned performance units that cliff-vest at the end of a 3-year performance period

The final amount of earned performance units can range from 0% to 200% of the amount initially awarded, based on achievement of 3-year company financial targets and strategic initiatives

RSUs

Performance-based grant of time vested RSUs, with payout calculated under a 25% to 200% performance scale based on achievement of an adjusted return on equity target and individual strategic objectives50% of the long-term incentive target amount is awarded in time-vested RSUs that vest ratably in equal annual installments over a 3-year period

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

34


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

With respect to awards for 2013. The primary change involved the performance/payout scale in our annual and supplemental incentive plans for corporate employees, in which incentive payouts begin at 75% of target operating income and return on equity (“ROE”)2014 performance and reach the maximum potential at 150% of target operating income and ROE performance. The 2012 Deloitte Comprehensive Review indicated that maximum performanceyear under the performance/payout curve forannual incentive plan, the Compensation Committee considered the number of metrics that would be appropriate and concluded that measuring performance against at least two metrics would better facilitate strategic growth while maintaining Quanta’s incentive plans was generallyentrepreneurial culture. The Compensation Committee recognized the benefit of evaluating more difficultthan one performance measure and applying different weights to attain than peer group practice, given that the majority of peers could receive maximum payout with performance at less than 150% of target. Moreover, dueeach measure. With respect to the size, blending and diversitytype of performance metric, the Compensation Committee acknowledged the merits of utilizing a financial results of Quanta’s operating units when considered at the consolidated corporate level,performance metric tied to profit, as well as Quanta’s significant growth since the payout scales were last adjusted, performance at 150% of targeted financial goals had become extremely difficultmetrics tied to achieve.

Acknowledgingstrategic measures. The Compensation Committee believed that an incentive program with an excessively difficult maximum payout fails to appropriately incentivize executive officers to excelevaluating individual performance in the annual incentive plan, rather than in the long-term incentive plan, would better achieve its objectives and further, that adjusted organic EPS growth would be a more comprehensive measure for evaluating NEO performance than operating income. See “Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Annual Incentive Plan” for detailed information about the components of their duties,the annual incentive plan.

With respect to awards under the 2014 long-term incentive plan, the Compensation Committee adjustedconsidered both the payout scalenumber and type of vehicles utilized and the performance metrics employed for purposes of compensating senior management. Previously, awards under the annual and supplemental incentive plans for corporate employees so that, given the appropriate level of performance, executive officers were able to reach the maximum potential payout at 125% of targeted financial performance. The Compensation Committee believes that the change is more consistent with the compensation practices of our peers and establishes more realistic incentives that appropriately reflect Quanta’s size, performance and market conditions, and offers a more consistent and competitive incentive program for our executive officers. Additionally, the Compensation Committee decided to eliminate from the supplemental incentive plan for corporate employeessenior management consisted of performance-based grants of restricted stock or RSUs that vested in equal annual installments over a 3-year period, with 50% of the award opportunity based on achievement of an adjusted return on equity target and the remaining 50% of the award opportunity based on attaining individual strategic objectives. The Compensation Committee considered the fact that many companies in Quanta’s peer group recognize long-term performance through grants of two types of equity vehicles, most commonly performance based awards and time-vested restricted stock or RSUs. The Compensation Committee concluded that providing time-vested RSUs as the equity vehicle for a portion of the 2013 performance yearlong-term incentive would foster retention and enhance the 110% multiplier previously usedcompetitiveness of Quanta’s compensation program for senior management. The Compensation Committee decided to adjust equity-based awardsemploy a “portfolio approach” to their cash equivalent, aslong-term incentives in order to diversify the types of incentives and enable Quanta to achieve multiple parallel objectives. The Compensation Committee believed that a combination of multiple award types could simultaneously foster retention, emphasize pay-for-performance, and link compensation to stock price appreciation. See “Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Long-Term Incentive Plan” for further information about the components of the long-term incentive plan.

Additionally, in January 2014 the Compensation Committee determined thatapproved a nonqualified deferred compensation plan for certain employees, including the variation in riskNEOs. See“Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Deferred Compensation Plan” for additional information about the deferred compensation plan and liquidity of long-term equity incentive awards versus cash awards was appropriate. Finally, paid health insurance premiums were eliminated as perquisitesthe 2014 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table for additional information about contributions to the executive officers beginning in 2013.plan, earnings/losses under the plan and aggregate balances for our NEOs under the plan.

Recognition of Transitional Disclosure Implications Associated with Changes Implemented

With the redesign of our long-term equity-based awards in 2014, the Compensation Committee recognized that, in this transition year, the 2014 Summary Compensation Table on page 51 and the 2014 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table on page 54 would reflect compensation decisions and equity awards under two distinct plan designs, one associated with a completed one-year performance period and the other relating to a prospective multi-year performance period. Consequently, the total compensation shown in the 2014 Summary Compensation Table and the equity-based awards shown in the 2014 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for Messrs. O’Neil, Austin and Jensen can be viewed asoverstated. This overstatement results from reporting in our 2014 compensation tables, as required by the SEC proxy disclosure rules, the value of both (i) awards granted in March 2014 relating to achievement of performance objectives under the 2013 supplemental incentive plan and special transaction bonuses associated with 2013 performance, and (ii) awards granted in March 2014 under the newly designed 2014 long-term incentive plan relating to a 3-year performance period ending December 31, 2016.

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

35


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

To illustrate the transition year implications, we have provided the Supplemental Table for 2014 Executive Compensation within footnote (13) to the 2014 Summary Compensation Table, which excludes equity-based awards granted under the 2013 supplemental incentive plan and other awards based on 2013 performance. Additionally, the table below provides a summary of the effect on the total compensation reported in 2014 for Messrs. O’Neil, Austin and Jensen that was attributable to equity-based awards associated with 2013 performance:

Named Executive Officer

Total Compensation
    Reported in 2014(1)     
 Total Compensation Reported
in 2014 Attributable to

2013 Performance(2)
 Total Compensation
Reported in 2014 (Excluding
Compensation Attributable to

2013 Performance)(3)
 

Mr. O’Neil

$                  10,362,179  $                    4,606,821  $                    5,755,358  

Mr. Austin

$4,787,423  $2,040,014  $2,747,409  

Mr. Jensen

$3,275,018  $1,273,085  $2,001,933  

(1)

Represents amounts shown in the “Total” column of the 2014 Summary Compensation Table.

(2)

Represents equity-based awards granted in March 2014 relating to (a) achievement of performance objectives under the 2013 supplemental incentive plan and (b) special transaction bonuses associated with 2013 performance.

(3)

Represents amounts shown in the “Total” column of the Supplemental Table for 2014 Executive Compensation included within footnote (13) to the 2014 Summary Compensation Table.

Executive

Compensation Decisions for 2014

Base Salary

Base salary is a critical element of our NEO compensation because it provides NEOs with a base level of monthly income that is consistent with competitive practices. Base salaries for NEOs including our former Executive Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer, are determined annually by the Compensation Committee, taking into account such factors as competitive industry salaries (especially the salary practices of companies in our peer group), a subjective assessment of the nature of the position, and the contribution, experience, level of responsibility and length of service of the NEO. While base salaries provide a basic level of economic security for our NEOs, a significant portion of an NEO’s target total direct compensation is performance-based compensation pursuant to the incentive compensation plans described below.

The following table reflects the increases in base salaries approved by the Compensation Committee during 2013:2014:

 

Named Executive Officer

 2012 Base Salary
  (through March 30, 2013)  
 2013 Base Salary
  (effective April 1, 2013)  
   Percentage Increase   2013 Base Salary Rate
(through March 30, 2014)    
 2014 Base Salary Rate
(effective April 1, 2014)    
 Percentage Increase     

Mr. O’Neil

 $825,000       $950,000       15.2%      $                950,000      $        1,000,000          5.3%      

Mr. Colson

 $900,000       $900,000       —       

Mr. Austin

 $600,000(a)    $725,000       20.8%      $725,000      $800,000          10.3%      

Mr. Haddox

 $540,193       $273,623(b)    —       

Mr. Jensen

 $420,000       $500,000       19.0%      $500,000      $550,000          10.0%      

Mr. Grindstaff

 $257,500       $265,225       3.0%      

Mr. O’Brien

 $240,000       $247,200       3.0%      

Mr. Morris

$425,000      $437,500          3.0%      

Mr. Kemps

$—     $450,000(1)       —     

Mr. Brown

$390,000      $390,000(2)       0.0%      

 

 (a)(1)

Prior to the promotionMr. Kemps was appointed as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Mr. Austin to Chief Operating Officer effective January 1, 2013, Mr. Austin’sQuanta on September 19, 2014, and therefore his base salary rate was $550,000 per year.effective as of his appointment.

 (b)(2)

The employment agreement between Quanta and Mr. Haddox called for hisBrown’s base salary to decrease by half to $270,096 per year,rate did not change effective April 1, 2013, and2014, as the Compensation Committee decided to increase such amount by approximately 1.3%. Mr. Haddox retired as Executive Vice Presidentannual salary adjustment date closely followed the date of Quanta effective March 31, 2014.his initial employment.

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

33

36


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

 

 

The Compensation Committee approved base salary increases of 15.2%5.3%, 20.8%10.3% and 19.0%, respectively,10.0% for Messrs. O’Neil, Austin and Jensen, respectively, concluding that a higher percentage increase than the other named executive officersNEOs and Quanta’s other corporate employees was warranted, due in part to expanded responsibilities, strong performance in light of individual performance objectives, and also to better align their base salaries with those of executives with similar positions and responsibilities at companies in our peer group. Upon considering the base salary of Mr. Colson as Executive Chairman relative to general industry peers and relative to the base salary level of the CEO, the Compensation Committee concluded that Mr. Colson’s base salary should remain unchanged. The employment agreement between Quanta and Mr. Haddox called for his base salary to decrease by half to $270,096 per year, effective April 1, 2013, and the Compensation Committee decided to increase such amount by approximately 1.3%. Based on the results of the 2012 Deloitte Compensation Benchmarking Study, published compensation survey data, the annual wage increase under Quanta’s collective bargaining agreement with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and certain other applicable unions, recent inflation data and the 3% base salary raise generally approved for Quanta’s other corporate employees, the Compensation Committee decided to approve a 3% increase in annual base salary for Messrs. GrindstaffMr. Morris. No increase in the base salary for Mr. Kemps or Mr. Brown was approved because the decisions were made prior to the commencement of Mr. Kemps’ employment and O’Brien.shortly after the commencement of Mr. Brown’s employment.

Annual Incentive Plan

Our annual incentive plan for senior leadership is designed to provide our NEOs with performance awards payable annually in cash in recognition of Quanta achieving a specified financial performance goal that istarget and the NEO achieving specified individual performance objectives, which are approved by the Compensation Committee (as discussed below).Committee. The Compensation Committee elects to pay such performance awards in cash. The NEO must be employed by Quanta on the date any bonus is paid under the annual incentive plan, and any NEO not employed forfeits any and all rights to such bonus. Awards for an eligible NEO that begins employment during the performance year will be pro-rated from the date of hire; however, in any event, an NEO must be employed by October 1st of the performance year to be eligible for an award.

Each NEO’s award pursuant toThe payout for each NEO under the annual incentive plan is determined based oncalculated as a percentage of such NEO’s base salary (the “AIP Target Incentive”), a portion of which is then multiplied by the achievement percentage associated with the company performance component and the balance of which is multiplied by Quanta of an operating income goal, which the achievement percentage associated with the individual performance component, as set forth in the following calculation:

LOGO

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

37


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

The Compensation Committee, believes encourages our NEOsafter taking into account, among other things, the results of the Deloitte Benchmarking Study and recommendations from the Chief Executive Officer (other than with respect to increase stockholder value by focusing on growth in revenue, while maintaining cost discipline. For purposeshimself), as well as the individual NEO’s position, experience, level of responsibility and length of service, established the following AIP Target Incentives for the 2014 performance year:

Named Executive Officer

Base Salary AIP Target Incentive
(% of Base Salary)
AIP Target Incentive
(Amount)
 Pro-Rated
AIP Target Incentive
(Amount)
 

Mr. O’Neil

$    1,000,000  110%$        1,100,000   N/A  

Mr. Austin

$800,000  100%$800,000   N/A  

Mr. Jensen

$550,000  100%$550,000   N/A  

Mr. Morris(1)

$437,500    90%$393,975  $        387,499  

Mr. Kemps(2)

$450,000    90%$405,000  $114,288  

Mr. Brown(3)

$390,000    90%$351,000  $248,157  

(1)

Due to Mr. Morris’ appointment as Executive Vice President – Corporate Development of Quanta on January 6, 2014, the Compensation Committee concluded that his AIP Target Incentive with respect to the 2014 performance year would be pro-rated to 359/365 of the amount shown (based on the portion of the fiscal year during which he was employed).

(2)

Due to Mr. Kemps’ appointment as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Quanta on September 19, 2014, the Compensation Committee concluded that his AIP Target Incentive with respect to the 2014 performance year would be pro-rated to 103/365 of the amount shown (based on the portion of the fiscal year during which he was employed).

(3)

Pursuant to Mr. Brown’s severance agreement, effective as of September 15, 2014 and as more fully described below in “Executive Separation Matters,” his AIP Target Incentive in respect of the 2014 performance year was pro-rated to 70.7% of the amount shown.

AIP Company Performance Component

The company component of the annual incentive plan, operating incomewhich accounts for 65% of a participant’s annual incentive opportunity under the plan, is defined as operating income, excluding amortizationbased on Quanta’s achievement of intangibles, gain (loss) on saleannual adjusted organic EPS growth (the “AIP Company Performance Component”). Generally, short-term incentives motivate and reward achievement of, assets and non-cashperformance in excess of, Quanta’s annual business goals. The Compensation Committee also believes this metric rewards our NEOs for improving financial results for stockholders of Quanta and provides a means to connect cash compensation less interest expense, net of interest income. Performance against the budgeted operating income goal is measuredafter accrual of the incentive bonus payouts earned (both cash and equity) by corporate plan participants. For the 2013 performance year,directly to Quanta’s short-term performance. Specifically, the Compensation Committee initially establishedbelieves adjusted organic EPS growth encourages our NEOs to grow the operatingCompany profitably, without taking excessive risk.

To measure adjusted organic EPS growth under the annual incentive plan, the Company’s actual adjusted organic EPS for the performance year is compared to a baseline adjusted organic EPS amount, and a payout begins to accrue only if adjusted organic EPS for the performance year is greater than the baseline amount. The baseline adjusted organic EPS amount is calculated as the prior year’s net income financialattributable to our Common Stock,plusthe full-year effect of acquisitions made during the year, andadjusted for the full-year effect of depreciation, amortization, interest income/expense and compensation expense related to the acquisitions. Actual adjusted organic EPS for the performance goal at $467.0 million. This goalyear is calculated similarly, except that budgeted post-acquisition contributions by businesses acquired during the performance year are deducted in order to calculate adjusted organic EPS that is comparable to the baseline. For both the baseline and performance year adjusted organic EPS, certain other adjustments may be considered and approved by the Compensation Committee for company results and pre-acquisition results of any acquired companies, including but not limited to, currency fluctuations, unbudgeted legal costs and expenses, charges associated with long-term contract receivables, transaction costs, impairment charges, and stock repurchase activities.

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

38


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

Based upon the performance/payout scale and adjusted organic EPS growth target adopted by the Compensation Committee, NEOs could earn cash awards under the AIP Company Performance Component as follows (when performance falls between the designated payout points, the cash awards are determined by interpolation):

Percentage of Target
Adjusted Organic EPS Growth Obtained

Percentage of Target Payout

Under AIP Company
    Performance Component Earned    

0%

0%

36%

25%

61%

50%

82%

75%

100%

100%

116%

125%

131%

150%

145%

175%

158%

200%

The target adjusted organic EPS growth was subject to equitable adjustments in the Compensation Committee’s discretion to account for events that significantly impact, positively or negatively, Quanta’s ability to achieve the originally established goal. The Compensation Committee subsequently increased the operating income financial performance goal to $485.9 million to adjusttarget; however, no adjustments were made for the contribution by six businesses acquired by Quanta during 2013.

The payout for each NEO under the annual incentive plan relates to a percentage of such NEO’s salary (the “AIP Target Incentive”). The Compensation Committee, after taking into account, among other things, the results2014 performance year. Additionally, if adjusted organic EPS growth exceeded 158% of the 2012 Deloitte Compensation Benchmarking Study and published compensation survey data, as well asgoal, resulting in a 200% payout pursuant to the individual NEO’s position, experience, levelabove scale, participants would be eligible to receive an exemplary award equal to up to an additional 200% of responsibility and length of service, established the AIP Target Incentives forIncentive amount, payable in RSUs that vest in equal annual installments over a 3-year period.

For the 20132014 performance year, for Messrs. O’Neil, Colsonthe Compensation Committee concluded that the Company earned adjusted organic EPS of $1.71, against a baseline of $1.67 and Austin as 100%a target of their respective base salaries, for Messrs. Haddox$1.78, thereby attaining approximately 35% of the adjusted organic EPS growth target and Jensen as 90%resulting in an achievement percentage of their respective base salaries,22.9%. The following table details the potential and for Messrs. Grindstaff and O’Brien as 50% of their respective base salaries.actual payouts associated with the AIP Company Performance Component:

Named Executive

Officer

Total AIP
Target Incentive
 AIP Company
Performance Component
(Weighted %)
Target Payout
Under AIP Company
Performance Component
(Amount)
 Achievement
Percentage
AIP Company Performance
Component Incentive
Award Earned
 

Mr. O’Neil

$    1,100,000  65%$            715,000  22.9%$            163,735  

Mr. Austin

$800,000  65%$520,000  22.9%$119,080  

Mr. Jensen

$550,000  65%$357,500  22.9%$81,868  

Mr. Morris(1)

$387,499  65%$251,874  22.9%$57,679  

Mr. Kemps(1)

$114,288  65%$74,287  22.9%$17,012  

Mr. Brown(1)

$248,157  65%$161,302  22.9%$36,938  

(1)

Amounts shown in the “Total AIP Target Incentive” column reflect pro rata reductions for Messrs. Morris and Kemps based on the portion of the fiscal year during which they were employed and for Mr. Brown based on the terms of his severance agreement.

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

34

39


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

 

AIP Individual Performance Component

The second component of annual incentive plan, which accounts for the remaining 35% of a participant’s annual incentive opportunity under the plan, is based on the NEO’s achievement of individual performance objectives established for the 2014 performance year (the “AIP Individual Performance Component”). Generally, these objectives may consist of safety statistics, return metrics, segment performance, safety leadership activities and other strategic initiatives, among others. The Compensation Committee believes achievement of the objectives by the NEOs relates to both quantitative and qualitative measures of performance that create stockholder value. The individual performance objectives, along with the related key initiatives and supporting metrics, for each NEO for the 2014 performance year were as follows:

 

Individual
Performance Objective

Key Initiatives / Achievement Metrics

Safety: Improve or maintain Quanta’s
total incident injury rate

•    Percentage achievement based upon performance in comparison to total incident injury rate from 2013 (applicable with respect to NEOs with responsibility for operations and acquisitions matters)

•    Administration and claims management (applicable with respect to NEOs with responsibility for accounting and legal matters)

Talent: Recruit, educate and develop employees to meet current and future needs of Quanta

•    Hire and successfully integrate individuals in key leadership positions

•    Establish repeatable and sustainable talent development and review process

•    Establish career development plans for key leaders

Property: Optimize use of property,
plant and equipment

•    Create actionable plan regarding restructuring of capital allocation decisions

•    Develop education and training for operating units to improve capital decisions

Based upon achievement of individual performance objectives as reflected below in the performance/payout scale adopted by the Compensation Committee, each NEO is eligible to receive a payout under the AIP Individual Performance Component up to a maximum payout equal to 200% of the target payout under the AIP Individual Performance Component. There is no exemplary award opportunity for the AIP Individual Performance Component. Thus, the NEOs could earn cash awards under the annual incentive plan for 2013AIP Individual Performance Component as follows (when the attainment of the performance goal falls between the designated percentages in the table below, the cash awards are determined by interpolation):

 

Percentage of Operating Income

                       Goal Attained                      

 Payout as a Percentage of
          AIP Target Incentive           

Less than 75%

 0%

75%

 25%

80%

 40%

85%

 55%

90%

 70%

95%

 85%

100%

 100%

105%

 120%

110%

 140%

115%

 160%

120%

 180%

125% or greater

 200%

Individual
    Performance Objective Attained    

Percentage of Target Payout
Under AIP Individual
    Performance Component Earned    

Does Not Meet

0%

Partially Meets

50%

Meets

100%

Exceeds

150%

Far Exceeds

200%

For the 2013 performance year, Quanta achieved operating income as calculated pursuant to our annual incentive plan of approximately $589.4 million, which represented approximately 121% of its operating income goal under the annual incentive plan and equated to a payout of 184% of the AIP Target Incentive. 

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

40


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

After an evaluation of Quanta’seach NEO’s achievement of the operating income financialhis individual performance goalobjectives during the 20132014 performance year, the Compensation Committee awardedconcluded that Messrs. O’Neil, Austin and Morris each attained 133%, 160% and 185% of their safety, talent and property individual performance objectives, resulting in an overall achievement percentage of 159%, while Messrs. Jensen, Kemps and Brown each attained 125%, 160% and 185% of their safety, talent and property individual performance objectives, resulting in an overall achievement percentage of 157%. The following table details the following cash incentives totarget and actual payouts associated with the NEOs under the annual incentive plan:AIP Individual Performance Component:

 

Named Executive Officer

      Base Salary       AIP Target
    Incentive    
   Percent Payout
of AIP
    Performance Goal    
   Incentive
Award
Earned
 

Mr. O’Neil

   $    950,000     100%       184%       $    1,748,000    

Mr. Colson

   $900,000     100%       184%       $690,000(a)  

Mr. Austin

   $725,000     100%       184%       $1,334,000    

Mr. Haddox

   $273,623     90%       184%       $453,120    

Mr. Jensen

   $500,000     90%       184%       $828,000    

Mr. Grindstaff

   $265,225     50%       184%       $244,007    

Mr. O’Brien

   $247,200     50%       184%       $227,424    

Named Executive

Officer

Total AIP
Target Incentive
 AIP Individual
Performance Component
(Weighted %)
Target Payout
Under AIP Individual
Performance Component
(Amount)
 Achievement
Percentage
AIP Individual Performance
Component Incentive
Award Earned
 

Mr. O’Neil

$    1,100,000  35%$            385,000  159%$                612,150  

Mr. Austin

$800,000  35%$280,000  159%$445,200  

Mr. Jensen

$550,000  35%$192,500  157%$302,225  

Mr. Morris(1)

$387,499  35%$135,625  159%$215,643  

Mr. Kemps(1)

$114,288  35%$40,001  157%$62,801  

Mr. Brown(1)

$248,157  35%$86,855  157%$136,362  

 

 (a)(1)

In light of Mr. Colson’s retirement as Executive Chairman of Quanta on May 23, 2013,Amounts shown in the Compensation Committee concluded that Mr. Colson would receive a“Total AIP Target Incentive” column reflect pro rata portion of the incentive bonus payable to him in respect of the 2013 performance year (basedreductions for Messrs. Morris and Kemps based on the portion of the fiscal year during which he served as Executive Chairman), as if he had remained in such position through the bonus payment date in accordance with Quanta’s annual incentive plan. Thus, the annual incentive award earned bythey were employed and for Mr. Colson was pro-rated to 5/12 of the payout otherwise calculatedBrown based on Mr. Colson’s AIP Target Incentive and Quanta’s achievementthe terms of the operating income goal under the annual incentive plan.his severance agreement.

SupplementalLong-Term Incentive Plan

Our supplementallong-term incentive plan compensatesfor senior leadership is designed to provide our NEOs based upon Quanta’s performance against a specified financial performance goal and the NEOs’ individual performance against specified strategic goals.with long-term incentive awards payable annually in equity-based awards. The first component, which accountstotal payout for 50% of the total target payouteach NEO under the supplementallong-term incentive plan is based on Quanta’s achievement of an ROE financial performance goal (the “ROE Component”), while the second component, which accounts for the remaining 50% of the payout opportunity, is based on the NEO’s achievement of certain approved individual strategic goals (the “Strategic Goal Component”). The Compensation Committee believes that

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

35


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

ROE measures our effectiveness in generating financial return relative to stockholders’ equity. The Compensation Committee also believes that the payout opportunity of the Strategic Goal Component allows the Compensation Committee to reward the achievement of strategic goals that are important to the long-term success of Quanta, independent of whether Quanta has achieved its financial performance goals for a fiscal year.

The payouts under both components of the supplemental incentive plan are dependent on a specified dollar amount for each NEO determined by the Compensation Committee to be subject to the plan (the “SIP“Long-Term Target Incentive”). The Compensation Committee, considered,after taking into account, among other things, the results of the 2012 Deloitte Compensation Benchmarking Study and published compensation survey data,recommendations from the Chief Executive Officer (other than with respect to himself), as well as the individual NEO’s position, experience, level of responsibility and length of service, in establishingestablished the SIPfollowing total Long-Term Target Incentives for the 2013NEOs in 2014:

Named Executive Officer

Total Long-Term
    Target Incentive    
 

Mr. O’Neil

$    3,800,000  

Mr. Austin

$1,300,000  

Mr. Jensen

$1,000,000  

Mr. Morris

$350,000  

Mr. Kemps(1)

$550,000  

Mr. Brown

$300,000  

(1)

Due to Mr. Kemps’ appointment as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Quanta on September 19, 2014, the Compensation Committee concluded that his Long-Term Target Incentive would be pro-rated to approximately 76.1% of the amount shown (based on the portion of the 3-year performance period during which he would be employed).

Generally, an NEO must be employed by Quanta on the date an award vests or is earned under the long-term incentive plan, and any NEO not employed forfeits any and all rights to such award. However, an NEO who ceased to be employed by Quanta prior to the completion of the 3-year performance year. Specifically,period described below has the potential to receive an award (or some portion thereof) represented by the equity award for that period, at the 2013discretion of the Chief Executive Officer and with the approval of the Compensation Committee. Awards for an

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

41


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

NEO added to the long-term incentive plan during the performance period are pro-rated from the date of hire; however, in any event, an NEO must be employed by October 1st of the first year of the 3-year performance period to be eligible for awards under the plan.

Long-Term Performance Unit Component

The first component of the long-term incentive plan, which accounts for 50% of a participant’s target incentive opportunity under the plan, is payable in performance units that cliff-vest at the end of a 3-year performance period based on achievement of 3-year company performance goals determined by the Compensation Committee (the “Long-Term Performance Unit Component”). Under the 2014 long-term incentive plan, in March 2014 the Compensation Committee approved the following performance unit awards:

Named Executive Officer

Total Long-Term
Target Incentive
 Long-Term
Performance Unit
Component
(Weighted %)
Target Long-Term
Performance Unit
Component
(Amount)
 Performance Units
Granted(1)
 

Mr. O’Neil

$            3,800,000  50%$     1,900,000   55,345  

Mr. Austin

$1,300,000  50%$650,000   18,934  

Mr. Jensen

$1,000,000  50%$500,000   14,565  

Mr. Morris

$350,000  50%$175,000   5,098  

Mr. Kemps(2)

$418,612  50%$209,306   6,366  

Mr. Brown(3)

$300,000  50%$150,000   4,369  

(1)

The number of performance units granted is determined by dividing the dollar amount of the target Long-Term Performance Unit Component by the average of the closing prices of Quanta’s Common Stock for the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of grant.

(2)

Amount shown for Mr. Kemps in the “Total Long-Term Target Incentive” column reflects a pro rata reduction based on the portion of the 3-year performance period during which he would be employed.

(3)

Mr. Brown did not remain employed by Quanta through the end of the performance period, and therefore the performance units he was awarded under the Long-Term Performance Unit Component were forfeited.

Though performance units representing the Long-Term Performance Unit Component target amount were granted to the NEOs in 2014, the number of performance units that will ultimately be earned and vest will be adjusted upward or downward (if necessary) based on company performance during the 3-year performance period ending December 31, 2016. The number of performance units that can become earned at the end of the performance period ranges from 0% to a maximum of 200% of the amount of performance units granted in 2014. Any earned performance units will vest immediately and will be settled by the issuance of Common Stock.

For the 3-year performance period, the Compensation Committee established company performance goals relating to (i) the SIP Target Incentiveachievement of certain strategic initiatives, as measured by pre-tax income contributions, and (ii) improvement of return on invested capital (“ROIC”). Each goal has a 0% to 200% performance scale and is equally weighted when calculating overall company performance for purposes of determining the number of earned performance units for each of our NEOsNEO. The performance targets and results for these goals may be adjusted as follows: Mr. O’Neil, $2,800,000; Mr. Colson, $1,800,000; Mr. Austin, $1,000,000; Mr. Haddox, $250,000; Mr. Jensen, $700,000; Mr. Grindstaff, $125,000; and Mr. O’Brien, $110,000.

For purposesappropriate, at the discretion of the ROE Component,Compensation Committee, to take into account any acquisitions or dispositions during the ROE financial performance goal is broadly defined as the quotient of the budgeted amount of net income excluding amortization of intangibles (measuredrelevant period.

afterStrategic Initiatives. accrual of the incentive bonus payouts earned by corporate plan participants), divided by average tangible stockholder’s equity, as adjusted for certain items. For the 2013 performance year,strategic initiatives goal, the Compensation Committee established targeted pre-tax income contribution amounts (including contributions of certain acquisitions and investments) from growth initiatives relating to certain customers, service markets, industry sectors and geographic regions. Total pre-tax income for the ROE financial performancestrategic initiatives goal at 12.0%. Based upon the performance/payout scale adoptedmay take into account trailing twelve month pro forma contributions, 2017 estimated contributions or other measurements deemed appropriate by the Compensation Committee, for 2013, NEOs could earn awards underexcluding items deemed to be non-recurring. The Compensation Committee believes that

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

42


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

achievement of these strategic initiatives supports the ROE Component upCompany’s growth objectives and strategic intent to diversify into new markets and services. The Compensation Committee established the following amountsperformance/payout scale for the strategic initiatives goal (when the attainment of the performance goal falls between the designated percentages in the below table, the awards arepercentage of target incentive earned is determined by interpolation):

 

Percentage of ROE

        Component Attained         

 Payout as a Percentage of SIP
  Target Incentive (ROE Component)  

Less than 75%

 0%

75%

 25%

80%

 40%

85%

 55%

90%

 70%

95%

 85%

100%

 100%

105%

 120%

110%

 140%

115%

 160%

120%

 180%

125% or greater

 200%

Percentage of

Target Pre-Tax

Income Goal Attained

Percentage of Target

Incentive Earned

Less than 67%

0%

83%

50%

100%

100%

117%

150%

133% or greater

200%

ROIC.  For the 2013 performance year, Quanta achieved ROE of 16.6%, which represented approximately 138% of the ROEROIC improvement goal, under our supplemental incentive plan and equated to a payout of 200% of the ROE Component of the SIP Target Incentive.

The Strategic Goal Component, which accounts for the remaining 50% of the payout opportunity under the supplemental incentive plan, is based on achieving certain individual strategic goals that are approved annually by the Compensation Committee for each NEOestablished a targeted increase in ROIC over the 3-year performance period. ROIC is designed to assess the Company’s efficiency at allocating capital under its control to profitable investments and whichis generally relate to both quantitativedefined as net operating profit after tax,divided by average invested capital (which is determined by taking the average of invested capital at the end of the performance period and qualitative measuresinvested capital at the end of performance that the prior year). The Compensation Committee believes createimprovement of ROIC is strongly connected to stockholder value. In determining payouts under the Strategic Goal Component, thevalue creation and improved capital allocation decisions. The Compensation Committee also considers each NEO’s demonstrationestablished the following performance/payout scale for the ROIC improvement goal (when attainment of ethical behavior and compliance with our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct. NEOs could earn awards ranging from zero to 100%the goal falls between the designated percentages in the table, the percentage of target based onincentive earned is determined by interpolation):

Percentage of Target
ROIC Growth Obtained

Percentage of Target

Incentive Earned

0%

0%

50%

50%

100%

100%

117%

150%

134%

200%

As soon as administratively practicable following the NEO’s achievementend of approved individual2016, the percentage attained and the percentage of target incentive earned for the strategic goals.initiatives goal and the ROIC goal will be determined, and the combined weighted percentage will then be multiplied by the number of performance units granted in 2014. This will result in a final number of earned and vested performance units, which will be settled in shares of our Common Stock.

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

36

43


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

 

 

AwardsLong-Term RSU Component

The second component of the long-term incentive plan, which accounts for the remaining 50% of a participant’s target incentive opportunity under the supplemental incentive plan, can be paid in cash, restricted stock, RSUs or a combination thereof at the Compensation Committee’s discretion. In recent years, awards have been paid in restricted stock that vests over three years in equal annual installments. For the 2013 performance year, awards to continuing NEOs were paidis payable in RSUs that vest over three years in equal annual installments and settle in common stock. Awards to Mr. Colson, who retired fromover the Company on May 23, 2013, and Mr. Haddox, who retired from3-year period following the Company on March 31, 2014, were paid in cash.date of grant (the “Long-Term RSU Component”). The Compensation Committee believes that these equity-basedtime-based awards provide a concrete link between our NEOs’ compensation and the creation of stockholder value and encourage executive officer retention.

Theretention of our NEOs. Under the 2014 long-term incentive plan, the Compensation Committee approved awards under the supplemental incentive plan for Quanta’s level of achievement of the ROE Component and the level of achievement with respect to each NEO’s Strategic Goal Component:

ROE Componentfollowing award amounts, which were granted in March 2014:

 

Named Executive Officer

 SIP Target Incentive
    (ROE Component)    
 Percent Payout of
SIP Performance Goal
     (ROE Component)      
 Incentive
Award
           Earned(a)          
Total
Long-Term
Target Incentive
 Long-Term
    RSU Component    
(Weighted %)
    Target Long-Term    
RSU Component
(Amount)
     RSUs Granted(1)     

Mr. O’Neil

   $                  1,400,000                200%       $2,800,000 $            3,800,000  50%$        1,900,000   55,345        

Mr. Colson

   $900,000                200%       $750,000(b)

Mr. Austin

   $500,000                200%       $1,000,000 $1,300,000  50%$650,000   18,934        

Mr. Haddox

   $125,000                200%       $250,000(c)

Mr. Jensen

   $350,000                200%       $700,000 $1,000,000  50%$500,000   14,565        

Mr. Grindstaff

   $62,500                200%       $125,000 

Mr. O’Brien

   $55,000                200%       $110,000 

Mr. Morris

$350,000  50%$175,000   5,098        

Mr. Kemps(2)

$418,612  50%$209,306   6,366        

Mr. Brown(3)

$300,000  50%$150,000   4,369        

 

 (a)(1)

The ROE componentnumber of RSUs granted for the Long-Term RSU Component is determined by dividing the dollar amount of the supplemental incentive plan awards to continuing NEOs were paid in RSUs with an aggregate value (based ontarget Long-Term RSU Component by the average of the closing prices of Quanta’s common stockCommon Stock for the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of grant) equal to the incentive award earned.grant.

 (b)(2)

In light ofAmount shown for Mr. Colson’s retirement as Executive Chairman of Quanta on May 23, 2013,Kemps in the Compensation Committee concluded that Mr. Colson would receive“Total Long-Term Target Incentive” column reflects a pro rata portion of the incentive bonus payable to him in respect of the 2013 performance year (basedreduction based on the portion of the fiscal year3-year period during which he served as Executive Chairman), as if he had remained in such position through the bonus payment date in accordance with Quanta’s supplemental incentive plan. Thus, the ROE component of the supplemental incentive award earned by Mr. Colson was pro-rated to 5/12 of the payout otherwise calculated based on Mr. Colson’s SIP Target Incentive and Quanta’s achievement of the return on equity goal under the supplemental incentive plan. The ROE component of the supplemental incentive award to Mr. Colson for the 2013 performance year was paid in cash.would be employed.

(c)

The ROE component of the 2013 supplemental incentive plan award to Mr. Haddox, who retired on March 31, 2014, was paid in cash.

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

37


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

Strategic Goal Component

Named

Executive

Officer

 SIP Target
Incentive
(Strategic Goal
Component)
 

2013 Strategic Goals

 Percent
Achievement
of Strategic
Goals
   Incentive
Award
    Earned(a)    

Mr. O’Neil

   $  1,400,000  Achieving consolidated safety and safety leadership goals; optimizing the five-year strategic plan; developing opportunities to increase market share and create growth; and implementing succession planning and leadership development initiatives   90.0%     $    1,260,000 

Mr. Colson

   $900,000  Providing Board leadership; developing a strategic plan for international growth; developing implementation plan for a training facility to improve operational effectiveness; and mentoring and supporting the goals of executive personnel   93.0%   $   348,750(b)

Mr. Austin

   $500,000  Achieving consolidated safety and safety leadership goals; attaining specified financial objectives within managed divisions; developing opportunities to increase market share and create growth; and implementing training initiatives to improve operational effectiveness   95.0%     $   475,000 

Mr. Haddox

   $125,000  Managing Quanta’s oversight of certain strategic investments; facilitating acquisition analysis and review and other corporate initiatives directed by senior management   93.0%     $   116,250(c)

Mr. Jensen

   $350,000  Optimizing the five-year strategic plan; enhancing the dissemination of financial information; optimizing the return on global financial system software; augmenting the Company’s comprehensive information technology strategy; and implementing succession planning and leadership development initiatives   95.0%     $   332,500 

Mr. Grindstaff

   $62,500  Maintaining Treasury function operations within internal control structure; optimizing risk mitigation strategies; improving intercompany transaction processes; refining international treasury policies; enhancing modeling capabilities and dissemination of financial information   92.5%     $   57,813 

Mr. O’Brien

   $55,000  Maintaining Tax function operations within internal control structure; enhancing the cross border transactions process; optimizing intercompany accounting processes; developing performance evaluation standards; analyzing tax return compliance processes   92.5%     $   50,875 

 

 (a)(3)

The strategic goal componentUpon termination of Mr. Brown’s employment, all of the supplemental incentive plan awards to continuing NEOsRSUs awarded were paid in RSUs with an aggregate value (based on the average of the closing prices of Quanta’s common stock for the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of grant) equal to the incentive award earned.

(b)

In light of Mr. Colson’s retirement as Executive Chairman of Quanta on May 23, 2013, the Compensation Committee concluded that Mr. Colson would receive a pro rata portion of the incentive bonus payable to him in respect of the 2013

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

38


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

performance year (based on the portion of the fiscal year during which he served as Executive Chairman), as if he had remained in such position through the bonus payment date in accordance with Quanta’s supplemental incentive plan. The Compensation Committee further concluded that the percentage of target performance to be pro-rated for payment to Mr. Colson under the strategic goal component of the supplemental incentive plan would approximate the average of the performance percentages earned by the chief executive officer, chief operating officer and chief financial officer, in recognition that the role and responsibilities of Mr. Colson leading up to his retirement transitioned to supporting the achievement of goals of such officers. Thus, the strategic goal component of the supplemental incentive award earned by Mr. Colson reflects an achievement percentage equal to the average of the achievement percentages earned by Messrs. O’Neil, Austin and Jensen, pro-rated to 5/12 of the payout otherwise calculated based on Mr. Colson’s SIP Target Incentive. The strategic goal component of the supplemental incentive award to Mr. Colson for the 2013 performance year was paid in cash.

(c)

The strategic goal component of the 2013 supplemental incentive plan award to Mr. Haddox, who retired on March 31, 2014, was paid in cash.forfeited.

Discretionary Incentive Plan

Awards under the discretionary incentive plan are madepresented to the Compensation Committee for approval at the discretionrecommendation of our Chief Executive Officer with the approval of the Compensation Committee, or at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, andOfficer. These awards are payable in cash, restricted stock, RSUs, or a combination thereof. These rewardsawards provide the Chief Executive Officer and the Compensation Committee with the flexibility to, among other things, reward exceptional performance. For the 20132014 performance year, the Chief Executive Officer did not recommend, and the Compensation Committee did not approve, awards to any awardsNEO under the discretionary incentive plan for any NEO.plan.

Transaction Bonuses

On December 6, 2013, we sold all of our equity ownership interest in Howard Midstream Energy Partners, LLC (“HEP”) for proceeds of approximately $220.9 million in cash which resulted in a pre-tax gain of approximately $112.7 million. In accordance with the terms of the annual incentive plan, the gain from the sale of HEP wasnot factored into the calculation of Quanta’s operating income performance for 2013. Acknowledging the significant contribution to Quanta’s 2013 results from the gain on the sale of Quanta’s investment in HEP, the Compensation Committee decided to award to certain executive officers a special transaction bonus in recognition of their contributions in connection with the Company’s strategic investment in HEP. Accordingly, in March 2014, the Compensation Committee awarded transaction bonuses to eachcertain of our NEOs as follows: Mr. O’Neil, $400,000; Mr. Colson, $60,000; Mr. Austin, $500,000; Mr. Haddox, $200,000;and Mr. Jensen, $200,000; Mr. Grindstaff, $120,000; and Mr. O’Brien, $120,000. In light of Mr. Colson’s retirement on May 23, 2013 and Mr. Haddox’s retirement on March 31, 2014, the$200,000. The transaction bonuses awarded to Messrs. Colson and Haddox were paid in cashRSUs that vest in three equal annual installments, with the initial vesting occurring in March 2014, and are reflected in the “Bonus” column of the 2013 Summary Compensation Table. The transaction bonuses awarded to the continuing NEOs were paid in RSUs vesting in three equal annual installments beginning in March 2014 and will be reflected in the “Stock Awards”Awards – Restricted Stock & RSUs” column of the 2014 Summary Compensation Table and in the “All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units” in the 2014 Grants of Plan Based Awards Table. The number of RSUs granted to each recipient was determined by dividing the amount of the award by the average of the closing prices of Quanta’s common stockCommon Stock for the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of grant.

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

44


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

Other Compensation

We have provided our NEOs with certain perquisites, including an annual executive physical program and an executive financial counseling program.program and, with respect to Mr. Kemps in connection with his hiring, certain relocation and commuting expenses. We believe these perquisites assist executives in dealing with the demands of their positions. Paid health insurance premiums were eliminated as executive compensation benefits in 2013, although Quanta continues to subsidize the health insurance premiums for NEOs and their families, if applicable, to the same extent as for other full-time corporate employees. The limited personal use of partially-owned aircraft by our NEOs in 20132014 consisted solely of spouses accompanying executives as additional passengers on certain business flights. The Compensation Committee reviews our policies with respect to perquisites on a regular basis to consider whether the perquisites should be maintained and whether, and to what extent, it may be appropriate to discontinue particular perquisites.

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

39


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

Our NEOs also receive matching contributions from Quanta to their 401(k) accounts, consistent with all other employees participating in Quanta’s 401(k) plan. Quanta matches 100% of an NEO’s pre-tax contributions up to the first 3% of such NEO’s base salary. Thereafter, Quanta matches 50% of an NEO’s pre-tax contributions up to the next 3% of such NEO’s base salary. All matching contributions are subject to certain limits as determined by law.

Executive Succession Matters

Transition of Mr. Haddox to Executive Vice President and Subsequent Retirement

In mid-2012, Mr. Haddox, then Quanta’s Chief Financial Officer, assumed the role of Executive Vice President. In connection with this transition, Quanta entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Haddox providing for a term beginning May 17, 2012 and continuing through March 31, 2014, based on the understanding that he would continue to work full time in the Executive Vice President role through March 31, 2013 and half-time thereafter through March 31, 2014. In approving the terms of the employment agreement, the Compensation Committee examined the roles and responsibilities for Mr. Haddox as Executive Vice President and considered the results of applicable benchmarking data. The Compensation Committee concluded that the compensation of Mr. Haddox as Executive Vice President should initially remain unchanged from that of his previous compensation as Chief Financial Officer, comprised of a base salary of $540,193, an AIP Target Incentive of 90%, and a SIP Target Incentive in the amount of $500,000 through March 31, 2013, followed by compensation at half of the then current base salary rate, an unchanged annual incentive target percentage, and half of the then current supplemental incentive target amount through March 31, 2014. The Compensation Committee subsequently decided to increase Mr. Haddox’s base salary (after application of the aforementioned decrease on March 31, 2013) by approximately 1.3%. Mr. Haddox retired as Executive Vice President of Quanta effective March 31, 2014. The annual incentive award, as well as the ROE component and the strategic goal component of the supplemental incentive award, for the 2013 performance year was paid to Mr. Haddox in cash. As provided in Mr. Haddox’s employment agreement, all outstanding awards of restricted stock and RSUs held by Mr. Haddox vested as of March 31, 2014.

Promotion of Mr. Austin to Chief Operating Officer

On December 21, 2012, Quanta announced the promotion of Mr. Austin, then the President of our Electric Power Division and Natural Gas and Pipeline Division, to Chief Operating Officer, effective as of January 1, 2013. In connection with the promotion, the Compensation Committee examined Mr. Austin’s responsibilities as Chief Operating Officer and reexamined the results of the 2012 Deloitte Compensation Benchmarking Study. Based on the benchmarking data, the Compensation Committee concluded that, effective upon the appointment of Mr. Austin as Chief Operating Officer on January 1, 2013, an annual base salary of $600,000 (increasing from $550,000 previously established for 2012), an AIP Target Incentive of 100% (unchanged), and an SIP Target Incentive in the amount of $1,000,000 (increasing from the 2012 target incentive of $700,000) would be appropriate. The Compensation Committee also authorized the grant of a restricted stock award to Mr. Austin on January 2, 2013, consisting of the number of shares of Quanta’s common stock having a fair market value (based on the average of the closing prices of Quanta’s common stock for the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of grant) equal to $250,000.

Retirement of Executive Chairman

Mr. Colson retired as Executive Chairman of Quanta and the Board effective May 23, 2013, the date of Quanta’s 2013 annual meeting. As of such date, Mr. Colson held unvested awards of restricted stock and RSUs covering an aggregate of 159,165 shares. The Compensation Committee approved the waiver of forfeiture restrictions and accelerated full vesting of all awards of restricted stock and RSUs held by Mr. Colson, effective upon his retirement. In addition, the Compensation Committee concluded that Mr. Colson would remain eligible to receive a pro rata portion of incentive bonuses, if any, that might be payable to him in respect of the 2013 performance year as the Company’s

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

40


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

Executive Chairman (based on the portion of the fiscal year during which he served as such), as if he had remained in such position through the bonus payment date in accordance with the Company’s annual and supplemental bonus plans, as determined by the Compensation Committee.

Following the end of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee determined payouts under our executive compensation plans with respect to Mr. Colson. The annual incentive award earned by Mr. Colson was pro-rated to 5/12 of the payout otherwise calculated based on Mr. Colson’s AIP Target Incentive and Quanta’s achievement of the operating income goal under the annual incentive plan. The ROE component of the supplemental incentive award earned by Mr. Colson was pro-rated to 5/12 of the payout otherwise calculated based on Mr. Colson’s SIP Target Incentive and Quanta’s achievement of the return on equity goal under the supplemental incentive plan. The strategic goal component of the supplemental incentive award earned by Mr. Colson reflects an achievement percentage equal to the average of the achievement percentages earned by Messrs. O’Neil, Austin and Jensen, pro-rated to 5/12 of the payout otherwise calculated based on Mr. Colson’s SIP Target Incentive. The annual incentive award, as well as the ROE component and the strategic goal component of the supplemental incentive award, for the 2013 performance year was paid to Mr. Colson in cash.

The Compensation Committee determined that the payments to Mr. Colson as set forth herein were warranted in light of the significant contributions of Mr. Colson as founder and former President, Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman of Quanta. Specifically, the Compensation Committee considered the strategic vision of Mr. Colson, his long service over the years and throughout Quanta’s history, and his dedication to its success. The Compensation Committee believed these payments were appropriate recognition for Mr. Colson’s allegiance, loyalty and untiring service to Quanta and its stockholders and his extraordinary contributions to the Company.

Changes to 2014 Compensation Program

Overview of Changes

The Compensation Committee undertook a comprehensive review of our executive compensation program in 2013 with the goal of identifying and implementing prospective changes to ensure that our incentive compensation remains consistent with Quanta’s guiding principles on executive compensation. In performing its review, the Compensation Committee considered input from Deloitte and senior management. In accordance with the authority and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee as set forth in its charter, and reflecting on Quanta’s continued growth, the Compensation Committee focused on overall incentive plan design. This effort concentrates the Compensation Committee’s detailed analysis and attention on the more senior personnel within the corporate management and operating unit management groups, while still allowing the Compensation Committee to exercise its authority on a summary level of aggregated amounts with respect to broader management groups. This initiative involved modifying the design of awards for the 2014 performance year under the annual and long-term (formerly referred to as supplemental) incentive plans for Quanta’s senior leadership team, consisting of approximately 21 individuals, including the NEOs, other executive officers, corporate vice presidents and functional leads.

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

41


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

Based on the 2012 Deloitte Comprehensive Review and the Deloitte Compensation Benchmarking Studies, the Compensation Committee decided to implement changes to our executive compensation program beginning in 2014, which are described below and summarized in the following table.

Incentive Compensation for 2013

Incentive Compensation for 2014

Annual Incentive Plan:

Number of metrics

Single metric

Multiple metrics

Metric No. 1

Operating income

Earnings per share (“EPS”) target (65% of the award opportunity)

Payout curve

Threshold payout equal to 25% of target incentive for performance at 75% of operating income goal; maximum payout equal to 200% of target incentive for performance at 125% or more of operating income goal

A payout begins to accrue only if EPS is greater than the prior year. Thus a payout equal to 0% of the target incentive is earned if EPS equals the prior year results. A threshold payout equal to 25% of the target incentive is earned if EPS growth equals 36% of the goal. The maximum cash payout equal to 200% of target incentive is earned if EPS reaches 158% of the goal.

Exemplary Award

N/A

Exemplary award is payable in time-vested RSUs for EPS growth exceeding 158% of the goal. Exemplary award cannot exceed 200% of the target incentive. The maximum exemplary award is earned if EPS reaches 255% of the goal.

Metric No. 2

N/A

Individual performance SMART goals (35% of the award opportunity)

Payout currency

Cash

Cash

RSUs if exemplary award is granted

Long-Term Incentive Plan:

Number of equity vehicles

Single vehicle

Two vehicles

Performance Units

N/A

50% of the long-term incentive target is awarded in performance units that cliff-vest at the end of a 3-year performance period pursuant to a 0% to 200% performance scale based on achievement of 3-year financial targets and strategic initiatives

RSUs

Performance-based grant of time vested RSUs, with payout calculated under a 25% to 200% performance scale based on achievement of an adjusted ROE target and individual strategic objectives

50% of the long-term incentive target is awarded in time-vested RSUs that vest ratably in equal annual installments over a 3-year period

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

42


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

Annual Incentive Plan

With respect to awards for the 2014 performance year under the annual incentive plan for the senior leadership team, the Compensation Committee considered the number of metrics that would be appropriate and concluded that measuring performance against at least two metrics would better facilitate strategic growth while maintaining Quanta’s entrepreneurial culture. The Compensation Committee acknowledged that the majority of companies in Quanta’s peer group have more than one performance measure and apply different weights to each measure. With respect to the type of performance metric, all of the companies in Quanta’s peer group except one utilized a financial performance metric tied to profit, and more than a majority used performance metrics tied to strategic measures. The Compensation Committee believed that evaluating individual performance in the annual incentive plan, rather than in the long-term incentive plan, would better achieve its objectives and further, that EPS would be a more comprehensive measure for evaluating NEO performance than operating income.

Thus, beginning with the 2014 performance year, 65% of a participant’s annual incentive opportunity under the annual incentive plan will be based on meeting a pre-established EPS target. Performance targets and results will be adjusted, as appropriate, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, to take into account any business acquisitions or divestitures or other non-recurring items during the base period and the performance period. The remaining 35% of a participant’s annual incentive opportunity under the annual incentive plan will be an individual performance component, based on achieving pre-set SMART (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant and time-bound) objectives established for each participant for the year. These objectives may consist of safety statistics, return metrics, segment performance, safety leadership activities and other strategic initiatives, among others.

Additionally, the payout curve for the new 2014 annual incentive plan for the senior leadership team has been adjusted. With respect to the EPS component, a payout begins to accrue only if EPS is greater than the prior year. Thus a payout equal to 0% of the target incentive is earned if EPS equals the prior year results. Participants may receive a threshold payout equal to 25% of the target incentive if EPS growth reaches 36% of the goal, up to a maximum cash payout equal to 200% of the target incentive if EPS growth reaches 158% of the goal. When performance falls between the designated payout points, the incentive will be determined by interpolation. If EPS growth exceeds 158% of the goal, participants will be eligible to receive up to an additional 200% of the annual incentive target in an exemplary award payable in RSUs that vest in equal annual installments over a three-year period. With respect to the individual performance component, participants may receive a threshold payout equal to 50% of the target incentive upon partial satisfaction of the SMART objectives, up to a maximum payout equal to 200% of the target incentive if performance far exceeds the SMART objectives. There is no exemplary award opportunity for the individual award component. Thus, the maximum award that can be earned under the annual incentive plan will equal 330% of target.

Long-Term Incentive Plan

With respect to awards for the 2014 performance year under the long-term incentive plan for the senior leadership team, the Compensation Committee considered both the number and type of vehicles utilized and the performance metrics employed for purposes of compensating senior management. Previously, awards under the supplemental incentive plan for senior management consisted of performance-based grants of restricted stock or RSUs that vested in equal annual installments over a three-year period, with 50% of the award opportunity based on achievement of an adjusted ROE target and the remaining 50% of the award opportunity based on attaining individual strategic objectives. The Compensation Committee acknowledged that the majority of companies in Quanta’s peer group recognize long-term performance through grants of two types of equity vehicles, most commonly performance based awards and time-vested restricted stock or RSUs.

The Compensation Committee decided to employ a “portfolio approach” to long-term incentives in order to diversify the types of incentives and enable Quanta to achieve multiple parallel objectives. The Compensation Committee believed that a combination of multiple award types could simultaneously foster retention, emphasize pay-

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

43


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

for-performance, and link compensation to stock price appreciation. Therefore, the Compensation Committee determined that 50% of a participant’s long-term incentive target value will be payable in performance units that cliff-vest at the end of a 3-year performance period based on achievement of 3-year financial targets and strategic goals determined by the Compensation Committee. A majority of the goals will be quantitative, including for example, return metrics, revenue/operating income targets, and safety metrics, among others, although strategic initiatives also may be included. For the 2014-2016 performance cycle, the Compensation Committee has determined that it would be most appropriate to establish goals relating to achievement of strategic initiatives, as measured by pre-tax income contributions, and return on invested capital (“ROIC”) improvement goals. The Compensation Committee has established specific performance measures for each of these goals, and the amount earned will be determined upon completion of the three-year performance period. Performance targets and results will be adjusted as appropriate, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, to take into account any business acquisitions or dispositions during the relevant period. Each goal will have a 0% to 200% performance scale, with differing performance scales applicable to each goal. The Compensation Committee believed that utilizing a multi-year performance period for the performance units will better align compensation with the interests of stockholders and enhance the link between compensation and stock price appreciation. The remaining 50% of a participant’s long-term incentive value will consist of RSUs granted during the performance year that vest in equal annual installments over a 3-year period following the date of grant. Giving consideration to the fact that 16 of the 18 companies in Quanta’s peer group use time-vested restricted stock or RSUs as a long-term incentive payout, the Compensation Committee concluded that providing time-vested RSUs as the equity vehicle for a portion of the long-term incentive would foster retention and enhance the competitiveness of Quanta’s compensation program for senior management.

Deferred Compensation Plan

In January 2014,Under the Compensation Committee approved a nonqualified deferred compensation plan forapproved by the Compensation Committee in January 2014, certain employees, including the NEOs. Under this plan, certain employees will beNEOs, are permitted to voluntarily defer receipt of up to 75% of base salary and up to 100% of other cash compensation and/or settlement of RSUs awarded pursuant to our incentive plans. In addition, an employeewith respect to each plan year, a plan participant who defers the maximum amount permitted by law for a plan year under the 401(k) plan maintained by Quanta will beis credited with an employer matching contribution under the deferred compensation plan for such plan year equal to the excess, if any,difference between (i) 100% of the first 3% of the compensation deferred under the plan, plus 50% of the next 3% of the compensation deferred under the plan, and (ii) the maximum matching contributionscontribution that would have been allocated to a participant’scould be contributed on behalf of the participant under the 401(k) plan account without regard to limitations pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), on amounts that were, in fact, allocated to a participant’s 401(k) plan account.maintained by Quanta. Matching contributions vest immediately. Quanta may also make discretionary employer contributions to the deferred compensation plan. Matching contributions and discretionaryDiscretionary employer contributions will be subject to a vesting schedule determined by Quanta at the time of the contribution, provided that vesting will accelerateaccelerates upon a change in control and the participant’s death or retirement. All matching and discretionary employer contributions, whether vested or not, will beare forfeited upon a participant’s termination of employment for cause or upon the participant engaging in competition with Quanta or any of its affiliates, predecessors, designees or successors.

RSUs that are deferred may be settled only in Quanta common stock.Common Stock. The deferred compensation plan will permitpermits participants to allocate deferred cash amounts among a group of notional accounts that mirror the gains and/or losses of various investment alternatives. These notional accounts willdo not provide for above-market or preferential earnings. Each participant may direct investments of the individual accounts set up for the participant under the plan and may make changes in the investments as often as daily. Since each executive officer may choose the investment alternative (which may include a selection of funds ranging from fixed income to emerging markets, as well as other equity, debt and mixed investment strategies) and may change their allocations from time to time, the return on the investment will dependdepends on how well each underlying investment fund performed during the time the executive officer chose it as an investment vehicle. The obligation to pay the balance of each participant’s account is at all times an unfunded and unsecured obligation of the Company.

Generally, participants will receive distributions of deferred amounts upon the earlier of separation from service, the occurrence of a disability, or a specified date (selected at the time of the deferral). Participants may elect to receive

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

44


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

distributions in the form of a lump sum or installments, and, in some cases, may elect to delay distribution upon termination of employment for up to five years. Participants mayare also be permitted to withdraw all or a portion of their deferred amounts under the plan in the event of an unforeseeable financial emergency.

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

45


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

Quanta reserves the right to amend or terminate the plan at any time and for any reason. Each NEO will be entitled to the amount credited to his account (if any) immediately prior to any amendment or termination.

A participant’s deferral elections must be renewed each year, and elections cannot be revoked or changed during the year. During 2014, Messrs. O’Neil, Austin, Jensen, Morris and Brown elected to defer a portion of their base salary and/or any award earned under our annual incentive plan. Also during 2014, Quanta made matching contributions but no discretionary contributions. For additional information on these contributions, see the 2014 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table.

Executive Appointment Matters

Effective January 6, 2014, Quanta appointed Mr. Morris as Executive Vice President – Corporate Development. In connection with his appointment, the Compensation Committee approved an annual base salary of $425,000, an AIP Target Incentive of 90% of his base salary rate, and a Long-Term Target Incentive in the amount of $350,000 for Mr. Morris. The obligationCompensation Committee also approved the grant of an equity award to pay the balance of each participant’s account will at all times be an unfunded and unsecured obligationMr. Morris on January 22, 2014, consisting of the Company.number of RSUs equal to the number of shares of Quanta’s Common Stock having a fair market value (based on the average of the closing prices of Quanta’s Common Stock for the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of grant) equal to $500,000, which shall vest in equal annual installments over a 3-year period following the date of grant.

Effective February 20, 2014, Quanta appointed Mr. Brown as Vice President and General Counsel. In connection with his appointment, the Compensation Committee approved an annual base salary of $390,000, an AIP Target Incentive of 90% of his base salary rate, and a Long-Term Target Incentive in the amount of $300,000 for Mr. Brown. The Compensation Committee also approved the grant of an equity award to Mr. Brown on March 4, 2014, consisting of the number of RSUs equal to the number of shares of Quanta’s Common Stock having a fair market value (based on the average of the closing prices of Quanta’s Common Stock for the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of grant) equal to $150,000, which was forfeited upon the termination of Mr. Brown’s employment on September 15, 2014.

Effective September 19, 2014, Quanta appointed Mr. Kemps as Executive Vice President and General Counsel. In connection with his appointment, the Compensation Committee approved an annual base salary of $450,000, an AIP Target Incentive of 90% of his base salary rate, and a Long-Term Target Incentive in the amount of $550,000 for Mr. Kemps. The Compensation Committee also approved the grant of an equity award to Mr. Kemps on September 19, 2014, consisting of the number of RSUs equal to the number of shares of Quanta’s Common Stock having a fair market value (based on the average of the closing prices of Quanta’s Common Stock for the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of grant) equal to $300,000, which shall vest in equal annual installments over a 3-year period following the date of grant.

Executive Separation Matters

Pursuant to a severance agreement between Quanta and Mr. Brown, our then Vice President and General Counsel, effective as of September 15, 2014, Quanta made a lump-sum payment to Mr. Brown in the amount of $292,500, less applicable taxes, representing 9-months’ salary, in consideration for his execution of a release of all claims against Quanta. Mr. Brown also remained eligible to receive a pro rata amount of the cash bonus, if any, that would be payable to him in respect of the annual incentive plan for the 2014 performance year. As discussed in “Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Annual Incentive Plan,” Mr. Brown was awarded a pro rata amount of $173,300 under the annual incentive plan. The Company determined that the terms of the severance agreement were warranted in light of Mr. Brown’s contributions during 2014 and his execution of the release.

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

46


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

Changes to 2015 Executive Compensation

Quanta’s executive compensation program will remain substantially similar in 2015; however, the Compensation Committee approved the following modifications to our 2015 annual and long-term incentive plans.

   
  20142015
AIP Company Performance Component Exemplary Award

An exemplary award is payable in time-vested RSUs for adjusted organic EPS growth exceeding 158% of the goal.

 

An exemplary award cannot exceed an incremental amount equal to200% of the target incentive amount.

An exemplary award is payable in time-vested RSUs for adjusted organic EPS growth exceeding 158% of the goal.

 

An exemplary award cannot exceed an incremental amount equal to100% of the target incentive amount.

Long-Term Target Incentive StructureFor all NEOs: (i)50% of the target amount is awarded in performance units and (ii)50% of the target amount is awarded in time-vested RSUs.

For our Chief Executive Officer: (i)53% of the target amount is awarded in performance units and (ii)47% of the target amount is awarded in time-vested RSUs.

 

For all other NEOs: (i)50% of the target amount is awarded in performance units and (ii)50% of the target amount is awarded in time-vested RSUs.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

Our Governance and Nominating Committee has established minimum stock ownership guidelines for executive officers, with the goal of promoting equity ownership and aligning our executive officers’ interests with our stockholders. The ownership guidelines are currently established at the following minimum levels:

 

Position

Guideline

Chief Executive Officer

5 x base salary

Chief Operating Officer

4 x base salary

Chief Financial Officer

3 x base salary

General Counsel

3 x base salary

Other Executive Officers

1 x base salary

The product obtained as described above is divided by the average closing price of Quanta Common Stock during the immediately preceding 12 months as reported by the NYSE to calculate the number of shares to be held by each executive officer under the guidelines. For purposes of determining compliance with the guidelines, the number of shares of Quanta’s common stockCommon Stock that an individual is expected to own is calculated as of December 31st of each year, using the individual’s then current base salary and the stock ownership multiple applicable to such executive officer as of such date. Once calculated, the number of shares that an individual is expected to own remains in effect, regardless of intervening compensation increases, promotions or stock price fluctuations, until December 31st of the following year, at which time a new calculation and compliance assessment will be made. Notwithstanding the foregoing, onceOnce an individual is determined to be in compliance with the ownership guidelines as of the annual assessment date, he shall bethe individual is deemed to remain in compliance, regardless of any subsequent stock price fluctuations, as long as he maintains ownership of at least the same number of shares as that required as of the annual assessment date forat which he was previously compliant.

Each executive officer is expected to attain the applicable stock ownership under the guidelines within five years following the later of (i) the first annual assessment with respect to such individual or (ii) the first annual

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

47


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

compliance assessment at which a higher stock ownership multiple becomes applicable to such individual (due to a promotion or otherwise). The five-year phase-in period is intended to permit gradual accumulation of the incremental ownership associated with a new or higher multiple, and ratable forward progress is expected during the five-year period. Under the stock ownership guidelines, shares held by a person or entity related to or controlled by the executive officer, as well as unvested shares of restricted stock or unvested RSUs held by an executive officer, and unvestedvested RSUs or resulting shares deposited into a deferred compensation plan or arrangement are included in the calculation of the amount of such individual’s ownership.

As of December 31, 2013,2014, all of our executive officers were in compliance with the requirements of our stock ownership guidelines, as two individuals who were first appointed as executive officers in 2012 and 2013, respectively, wereeither by exceeding the prescribed ownership level or being expected to exceed the prescribed ownership level within five years of initial appointment, and all remaining executive officers exceeded the ownership prescribed by the stock ownership guidelines.its applicability.

Pledging, Hedging and Other Transactions in Quanta Securities

Effective as of April 1, 2014, the Board approved an amended and restated Quanta Services, Inc. Insider Trading Policy, which (among other things) prohibits directors and executive officers of Quanta from pledging Quanta securities as collateral for a loan unless the individual demonstratesprovides reasonable assurance of the financial capacity to repay the loan without

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

45


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

resort resorting to the pledged securities and obtains pre-clearance of the pledge by a management committee or the Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board. Transactions by directors and executive officers in Quanta’s securities involving short sales, puts, calls or other derivative securities, on an exchange or in any other organized market, are prohibited. Directors and executive officers are also prohibited from entering into hedging, monetization transactions or similar arrangements involving Quanta securities, such as prepaid variable forwards, forward sale contracts, equity swaps, collars, zero-cost collars and other derivative transactions. We believe these prohibitions ensure that levels of stock ownership in accordance with our stock ownership guidelines are effective in aligning each individual’s interests with those of our stockholders.

Employment Agreements

Quanta is (or was, in the case of one former executives)executive) a party to an employment agreement with each of our NEOs other than Mr. O’Brien.NEOs. Under the terms of our employment agreements, the executive is entitled to payments and benefits upon the occurrence of specified events, including termination of employment or change in control of Quanta. The specific terms of these arrangements, as well as an estimate of the compensation that would have been payable had they been triggered as of fiscal year-end, are described below in the section entitled“Executive Compensation – Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.” The termination of employment provisions of the employment agreements provide these individuals with a fixed amount of compensation upon termination as an inducement to offset the potential risk of leaving their prior employer or foregoing other opportunities in order to join or maintain employment with us, as applicable. At the time of entering into these agreements, the Compensation Committee considered our aggregate potential obligations in the context of the desirability of hiring or maintaining the employment of the individual, as applicable, and the expected compensation upon joining or maintaining employment with us, as applicable.

The employment agreements entered into during 2011 with Messrs. O’Neil and Colson, as well as the employment agreements entered into during 2012 with Messrs. Austin, Haddox and Jensenour NEOs do not contain excise tax gross-up provisions,provisions. In connection with the appointment of Mr. Morris as Executive Vice President – Corporate Development, the appointment of Mr. Brown as Vice President and General Counsel, and the appointment of Mr. Kemps as Executive Vice President and General Counsel in 2014, the Compensation Committee no longer offered this benefit when Quanta entered into these agreements. Underapproved the legacyterms reflected in their employment agreement entered intoagreements, as described in 2000 with Mr. Grindstaff, if benefits to which he becomes entitled are subject to excise taxes under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, then he generally will be entitled to an additional payment in an amount equal to the excise tax imposed plus any federal, state and local income taxes and additional excise taxes attributable to such payment. “Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Executive Appointment Matters.

Indemnification Agreements

We have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers, in part to enable us to attract and retain qualified directors and executive officers. These agreements require us, among

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

48


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

other things, to indemnify such persons against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers, to advance their expenses for proceedings for which they may be indemnified, and to cover such person under any directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy that we may maintain from time to time. These agreements are intended to provide indemnification rights to the fullest extent permitted under applicable Delaware law and are in addition to any other rights our directors and executive officers may have under our Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws and applicable law.

Risk Considerations in our Compensation Program

The Compensation Committee has discussed the concept of risk as it relates to our compensation program for the 2013 performance year,2014, and the Compensation Committee does not believe our compensation program encourages excessive or inappropriate risk taking for the following reasons:

 

The Compensation Committee structures executive compensation at the senior leadership level to consist of both fixed and variable compensation. The fixed or base salary portion of compensation is typically set at market levels and is designed to provide a steady income regardless of Quanta’s stock price performance so that executivessenior leadership do not feel pressured to focus exclusively on stock price performance to the detriment of other important business metrics. The variable portions of compensation (described in detail above) are generally designed to reward both short-term and long-term corporate and individual performance as measured under several performance metrics and to provide long-term bonuses not tied to company performance or the achievement of individual goals. Equity-based awards under our long-term incentive plan vest either at the end of the 3-year performance period or over three years in equal annual installments, which the Compensation Committee believes encourages senior leadership to focus on sustained stock appreciation and promotes retention. The Compensation Committee believes that these variable elements of compensation are a sufficient percentage (generally greater than 50%) of overall compensation to motivate senior leadership to produce superior short-term and long-term corporate results, while the fixed element is also sufficiently high that they are not encouraged to take unnecessary or excessive risks in doing so.

The Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers, which the Compensation Committee believes provide a considerable incentive for management to consider Quanta’s long-term interests because a meaningful portion of their personal investment portfolio consists of Quanta Common Stock.

The Board has adopted a prohibition on hedging the economic risk of ownership of Quanta Common Stock applicable to our executive officers, which reinforces the alignment of our management’s long-term interests with those of our stockholders.

The Compensation Committee structures compensation at the corporate management and operating unit management levels to consist of both fixed and variable compensation. The fixed or base salary portion of compensation is typically set at market levels. The variable portions of compensation are generally designed to reward both short-term and long-term performance. With respect to corporate management, our annual incentive plan awards are based on the achievement of a certain annual company financial performance target and specified individual performance objectives, and our stock incentive plan awards are based on the achievement by the participant’s department of specific key performance indicators and achievement by the participant of specific key behaviors, which include entrepreneurship, teamwork, innovation, proactiveness and ownership. With respect to operating unit management, our annual incentive plan awards are based on the achievement by the operating unit of an annual operating income goal, and our stock incentive plan awards are based on the achievement

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

46

49


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

 

 

 

not feel pressured to focus exclusively on stock priceof an annual ROIC performance to the detrimenttarget and satisfaction of other important business metrics. The variable portions of compensation, which are described in detail above, are generally designed to reward both short-termannual safety goals and long-term corporate and individual performance as measured under several performance metrics. For short-term performance, our annual incentive plan awards bonuses based on the achievement by Quanta of a certain annual operating income goal. For long-term performance, our supplemental incentive plan awards bonuses based on the achievement by Quanta of a certain annual return on equity goal as well as on the achievement by the individual plan participant of certain strategictalent development goals. Equity-based awards under our supplementalstock incentive planplans for corporate management and operating unit management generally vest overin three years in equal annual installments, which the Compensation Committee believes encourages plan participants to focus on sustained stock appreciation and promotes retention of key employees. The Compensation Committee believes that these variable elements of compensation are a sufficient percentage (generally greater than 50%) of overall compensationachieve objectives similar to motivate plan participants to produce superior short-term and long-term corporate results, while the fixed element is also sufficiently high that plan participants are not encouraged to take unnecessary or excessive risks in doing so.those under our senior leadership incentive plans

 

The Compensation Committee also structures executive compensation at the operating unit level to consist of both fixed and variable compensation. The variable portions of compensation are generally designed to reward both short-term and long-term operating unit and individual performance as measured under several performance metrics. For short-term performance, our operating unit annual incentive plan awards bonuses based on the achievement by a particular operating unit of an annual operating income goal and certain safety goals, as well as achievement by the individual plan participant of certain strategic goals. For long-term performance, our operating unit supplemental incentive plan awards bonuses based on the achievement by a particular operating unit of a certain annual modified return on asset goal. The Compensation Committee believes that these elements of compensation achieve objectives similar to those under our corporate incentive plans.

As operating income, return on equity and, at the operating unit level, modified return on assets are the financial performance measures for determining incentive payments under our incentive plans, the Compensation Committee believes plan participants are encouraged to take a balanced approach that focuses on corporate profitability, rather than other measures which may incentivize management to enter into projects without regard to cost structure. Further, Quanta has strict internal controls with respect to capital expenditures as well as bid and project approvals, which are designed to prevent an individual from entering into projects that do not meet certain requirements. If performance goals are not met at the threshold level, there are generally no payouts under our incentive plans (excludingand the individual strategic goal and safety goal components of our incentive plans). In addition, the strategic goalsdepartmental objectives approved for each plan participantparticipants are aligned with Quanta’s short-term and long-term operating and strategic plans, as applicable, and are designed to achieve a proper risk/reward balance without encouraging unnecessary or excessive risk taking.

 

The Compensation Committee caps awardsAwards are capped under our annual and supplemental incentive plans, which the Compensation Committee believes also mitigates excessive risk taking. Therefore, even if Quanta or thean operating unit, as applicable, and the individualplan participant dramatically exceed their respective performance goals, awards are limited. If performance falls significantly short of expectations, no awards will be made.

 

Quanta has strict internal controls over the measurement and calculation of performance goals under our incentive plans, which are designed to keep it from being susceptible to manipulation by any employee. In addition, all of our employees are required to comply with our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which covers, among other things, accuracy of books and records.

 

The Compensation Committee believes that the combination of operating income and ROE/ROA financial goals (throughperformance measures incorporated in our senior leadership, corporate management and operating unit annualmanagement incentive plans)plans and extended exposure to stock

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

47


Compensation Discussion & Analysis

price performance (through our equity compensation program and stock ownership guidelines) provides price performance through equity-based compensation achieve an appropriate balance and discourages excessive risk taking. For example, even if plan participants could inappropriately increase Quanta’s operating income (as defined under the corporate or operating unit annual incentive plan, as applicable) by excessive expense reductions or by abandoning less profitable revenue sources, this could be detrimental to Quanta in the long term and would be discouraged under our compensation program because it would ultimately harm our stock price and the value of their equity awards. Likewise, if plan participants were to add revenue sources at low margins in an attempt to generate a higher growth company multiple and increased stock prices, it could decrease operating income and the value of their cash bonuses under the annual incentive plan.

The Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines, which the Compensation Committee believes provide a considerable incentive for management to consider Quanta’s long-term interests because a meaningful portion of their personal investment portfolio consists of Quanta stock.

The broad structure of our corporate incentive plans has not significantly changed for several years, and the Compensation Committee is not aware of any evidence that it encourages unnecessary ordiscourage excessive risk taking.

 

Quanta has a “clawback” policy under each of its incentive plans that allows us to recover certain incentive compensation from executive officers and other key employees in the event of a misstatement of earnings.

Impact of Regulatory Requirements on our Executive Compensation Decisions

The Compensation Committee considers accounting and tax implications of its compensation decisions as one factor among many. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits a company’s ability to deduct compensation paid in excess of $1 million during any fiscal year to each of certain executive officers unless the compensation is “performance-based” as defined under federal tax laws. To the extent possible, the Compensation Committee structures compensation and awards to preserve the federal income tax deductibility of the compensation payable to our NEOs. The Compensation Committee has in the most recent year and may in the future choose however, to provide compensation that may not be deductible if it believes that such payments are appropriate to ensure that our NEOs receive total compensation that is competitive with our peer group or reflects superior performance.

Conclusion

We believe our total executive compensation program is designed to pay for performance. It aligns the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders and provides executive officers with the necessary motivation to maximize the long-term operational and financial performance of Quanta, while using sound financial controls and high standards of integrity. We also believe that total compensation for each executive officer should be, and is, commensurate with the execution of specified short- and long-term operational, financial and strategic objectives. We believe that the quality of our executive compensation program will continue to be reflected in positive long-term operational, financial and stock-price performance.

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

48

50


Executive Compensation

 

20132014 Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the compensation paid or accrued by Quanta in the last three fiscal years to our NEOs:

 

Name and Principal Position

 Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus(1)
($)
  Stock
Awards(2)
($)
  Option
Awards
($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(3)
($)
  Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
  All Other
Compen-
sation(4)

($)
  Total
($)
 

James F. O’Neil III (5)

  2013     918,750         3,014,556     —     1,748,000     —     34,662     5,715,968   

President and Chief Executive Officer

  2012   �� 806,250         870,147     —     1,600,500     —     33,979     3,310,876   
  2011     637,846         561,762     —     255,000     —     32,619     1,487,227   

John R. Colson (6)

  2013     358,269     60,000    3,014,556     —     1,788,750     —     74,904     5,296,479   

Former Executive Chairman

  2012     893,525         1,336,509     —     1,746,001     —     30,858     4,006,893   
  2011     867,734         1,059,296     —     297,194     —     30,641     2,254,865   

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr. (7)

  2013     693,750         1,432,242     —     1,334,000     —     24,250     3,484,242   

Chief Operating Officer

  2012     531,250         585,491     —     1,067,000     —     16,842     2,200,583   
  2011     458,250         246,410     —     145,350     —     16,087     866,097   

James H. Haddox (8)

  2013     340,265     200,000    837,369     —     819,370     —     39,278     2,236,282   

Former Executive Vice President

  2012     536,260         398,761     —     943,178     —     32,486     1,910,685   
  2011     520,641         294,240     —     160,485     —     30,807     1,006,173   

Derrick A. Jensen (9)

  2013     480,000         711,771     —     828,000     —     32,142     2,051,913   

Chief Financial Officer

  2012     387,257         522,761     —     733,320     —     16,549     1,659,887   
  2011     311,088         257,165     —     99,450     —     15,793     683,496   

Nicholas M. Grindstaff (10)

  2013     263,294         207,226     —     244,007     —     8,179     722,706   

Vice President – Finance
and Treasurer

  2012     255,625         99,679     —     249,775     —     16,842     621,921   
         

Peter B. O’Brien (11)

  2013     245,400         201,269     —     227,424     —     12,050     686,143   

Vice President–Mergers and Acquisitions

         

Name and Principal Position

Year Salary
($)
 Stock Awards Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(4)
($)
 Change in
Pension
Value and
NQDC
Earnings(5)

($)
 All
Other

Compen-
sation(6)

($)
 Total(7)
($)
 
Performance
Units(1)

($)
 

 

Restricted
Stock &
RSUs(2)
($)

 Total(3)
($)
 

James F. O’Neil III

 2014   987,500   1,962,534   6,569,355   8,531,889(13)  775,885      66,905   10,362,179  

President and Chief Executive

 2013   918,750      3,014,556   3,014,556   1,748,000      34,662   5,715,968  

Officer

 2012   806,250      870,147   870,147   1,600,500      33,979   3,310,876  

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.(8)

 2014   781,250   671,400   2,711,414   3,382,814(13)  564,280      59,079   4,787,423  

Chief Operating Officer

 2013   693,750      1,432,242   1,432,242   1,334,000      24,250   3,484,242  
 2012   531,250      585,491   585,491   1,067,000      16,842   2,200,583  

Derrick A. Jensen(9)

 2014   537,500   516,475   1,789,560   2,306,035(13)  384,093      47,390   3,275,018  

Chief Financial Officer

 2013   480,000      711,771   711,771   828,000      32,142   2,051,913  
 2012   387,257      522,761   522,761   733,320      16,549   1,659,887  

Jesse. E. Morris(10)

 2014   429,931   180,775   693,376   874,151   273,322         1,577,404  

Executive Vice President – Corporate

Development

Steven J. Kemps(11)

 2014   126,346   189,516   492,295   681,811   79,813      16,409   904,379  

Executive Vice President and

General Counsel

Eric B. Brown(12)

 2014   221,750   154,925   319,307   474,232   173,300      293,935   1,163,217  

Former Vice President and

General Counsel

 

(1)

The amounts shown for 2013 under “Bonus” reflect special transaction bonuses, to the extent that such bonuses were paid in cash to certain executives, in recognition of the contributions of these executives in connection with the Company’s strategic investment in HEP, which was sold by Quanta in 2013. For a discussion of these transaction bonuses, please read “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for the 2013 Performance Year – Other Compensation.

(2)

The amounts shown for 2013 under “Stock Awards” reflect the aggregate grant date fair value (based on the closing price of Quanta’s common stockCommon Stock on the date of grant) of RSUsperformance units granted during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013,2014, and the probable outcome of the associated performance conditions, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The value ultimately realized by the NEO upon actual vesting of the awards may or may not be equal to this determined value. Performance units generally vest upon completion of a 3-year performance period ending December 31, 2016, with the amount that vests based on the achievement of certain company financial targets and strategic initiatives. The final amount of earned performance units can range from 0% to a maximum of 200% (assuming the highest level of performance) of the initial target amount of unearned performance units granted, and upon settlement shares of Common Stock are issued for each earned performance unit. The reported value of the contingent performance awards is computed based on the grant date estimate of compensation cost to be recognized over the 3-year performance period, which was 100% or the target amount. The value of the contingent performance awards on the grant date if the highest level of performance conditions were to be achieved would be as follows: for Mr. O’Neil, $3,925,068; for Mr. Austin, $1,342,800; for Mr. Jensen, $1,032,950; for Mr. Morris, $361,550; and for Mr. Kemps, $379,032. The performance units are described in further detail in “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Long-Term Incentive Plan.” Assumptions used in the valuations are discussed in Note 12 to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014 in its Annual Report on Form 10-K. Performance unit award agreements give holders the right to receive dividend equivalent payments as and when dividends are paid on Common Stock.

(2)

The amounts shown reflect the aggregate grant date fair value (based on the closing price of Quanta’s Common Stock on the date of grant) of restricted stock or RSUs granted, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The value ultimately realized by the NEO upon the actual vesting of the award(s)awards may or may not be equal to this determined value. The averageSuch amounts for 2014 reflect RSUs that were granted during 2014 to NEOs under both Quanta’s 2013 supplemental incentive plan in respect of the closing prices of Quanta’s common stock for the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of grant was used to determine the number of RSUs granted. The table does not include information regarding equity-based awards related to 2013 performance that wereyear,and Quanta’s 2014 long-term incentive plan in respect of the 3-year performance

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

51


Executive Compensation

period ending December 31, 2016. In addition, such amounts for 2014 reflect RSUs granted in March 2014 whichto certain NEOs as payment for special transaction bonuses related to the sale of HEP in 2013. For a summary of the equity awards will be reflectedfor Messrs. O’Neil, Austin and Jensen excluding those in respect of the 2013 performance period, please see the Supplemental Table for 2014 Executive Compensation within footnote (13) below. RSU awards under the 2013 supplemental incentive plan and the 2014 Summary Compensation Table. For a discussion of these equity-based awards, please read “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for the 2013 Performance Year.” RSU awardslong-term incentive plan vest over three years in equal annual installments commencing onin the applicable vestingyear following the grant date foryear in the quarter corresponding to the quarter in which the award is made, assuming the NEO continues to meet the requirements for vesting. RSU awards associated with the special transaction bonuses vest in three equal installments commencing in March 2014, assuming the NEO continues to meet the requirements for vesting. For further discussion of these equity-based awards, please read “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Long-Term Incentive Plan” and “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – ExecutiveCompensation Decisions for 2014 – Transaction Bonuses. RSU award agreements give holders the right to receive dividend equivalent payments as and when dividends are paid on Common Stock.

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

49


Executive Compensation

(3)

AmountsThe amounts shown under “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation”reflect the total of the previous two columns – “Performance Units” and “Restricted Stock & RSUs.”

(4)

The amounts shown represent the dollar value of cash incentives earned under ourQuanta’s annual incentive plan except that the amount shown for Messrs. Colson and Haddox in 2013 represents the dollar value of incentives earned for the 2013applicable performance year under both our annual incentive plan and our supplemental inventive plan.year. For further details regarding these plans,the 2014 annual incentive plan, see“Compensation Discussion and& Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for the 2013 Performance Year2014 – Annual Incentive Plan”Plan.” and “ – Supplemental Incentive Plan” above. The cash incentives reflected in the table were earned during the 2014, 2013 2012 and 20112012 performance years as indicated, but were approved by the Compensation Committee and paid as late asin March of 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, respectively.

 

(4)(5)

NQDC refers to nonqualified deferred compensation.

(6)

The amounts reflected under “All Other Compensation” for fiscal 2013year 2014 are identified in the 20132014 All Other Compensation Table below.

(5)

Effective May 19, 2011, Mr. O’Neil was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to this appointment, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer.

(6)

Effective May 23, 2013, Mr. Colson retired as Executive Chairman, the position in which he served since May 19, 2011. Prior to this appointment, he served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

(7)

Effective January 1, 2013, Mr. Austin was appointed Chief Operating Officer. Prior to this appointment, he served as President – Electric Power Division and Natural Gas & Pipeline Division.

(8)

Effective March 31, 2014 Mr. Haddox retired as Executive Vice President, the position in which he served since May 17, 2012. Prior to this appointment, he served as Chief Financial Officer.

(9)

Effective May 17, 2012, Mr. Jensen was appointed Chief Financial Officer. Prior to this appointment, he served as Senior Vice President – Finance, Administration and Chief Accounting Officer.

(10)

Compensation information for 2011 is not reflected for Mr. Grindstaff because he was not a named executive officer for that year.

(11)

Compensation information for 2011 and 2012 is not reflected for Mr. O’Brien because he was not a named executive officer for those years.

2013 All Other Compensation Table

The following table describes each component of the “All Other Compensation” column in the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal 2013:

 

  

401(k)

Matching

Contribution(a)

($)

    

Financial

Planning

Reimbursement(b)
($)

  

Other(c)

($)

    

Total(d)

($)

 

James F. O’Neil III

  11,475      8,531     14,656      34,662   

John R. Colson

  11,475      8,131     55,298      74,904   

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.

  11,475      —     12,775      24,250   

James H. Haddox

  11,475      17,255     10,548      39,278   

Derrick A. Jensen

  11,475      20,667     —      32,142   

Nicholas M. Grindstaff

  8,179      —     —      8,179   

Peter B. O’Brien

  9,979      —     2,071      12,050   
 401(k)
Matching
  Contribution(a)  
($)
 Financial
Planning
  Reimbursement(b)  
($)
 Corporate
Housing /
  Relocation(c)  

($)
 Company
Contributions to
  NQDC Plan(d)  

($)
     Other(e)    
($)
     Total(f)    
($)
 

James F. O’Neil III

 11,700      20,379   33,750   1,076   66,905  

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.

 11,700      20,379   27,000      59,079  

Derrick A. Jensen

 11,700   17,127      18,563      47,390  

Jesse E. Morris

                  

Steven J. Kemps

       16,409         16,409  

Eric B. Brown

             293,935   293,935  

 

 (a)

Represents Quanta’s matching contributions to the NEO’s 401(k) account.

 

 (b)

Represents Quanta’s reimbursement of the NEO’s financial planning expenses under our executive financial counseling program.

 

 (c)

Represents Quanta’s reimbursementthe following perquisites for executive physical examinations under our executive physical program2014: (i) for Messrs. O’Neil and Austin, occasional use of a corporate apartment with respect to Messrs. O’Neil and Austin, retirement gifts with respect to Messrs. Colson and Haddox, and(ii) for Mr. Kemps, as part of his relocation package, reimbursement for executive physical examinations under our executive physical program with respect to Mr. O’Brien.rental of a corporate apartment and commuting expenses.

 

 (d)

Represents Quanta’s matching contributions under the nonqualified deferred compensation plan for certain key employees that would have been allocated to the NEO’s 401(k) plan account, but for applicable limits under the Internal Revenue Code. For additional information on these contributions and other potential contributions by Quanta, see “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Deferred Compensation Plan.”

(e)

Represents the following perquisites for 2014: (i) for Mr. O’Neil, reimbursement for a physical examination under our executive physical program and (ii) for Mr. Brown, reimbursement for a physical examination under our executive physical program and a lump-sum payment of $292,500 (representing 9 months’ salary) as a severance payment upon the termination of his employment, as further described in “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Executive Separation Matters.”

(f)

When Quanta’s corporate aircraft is flying to a destination for a business purpose, only the direct variable costs associated with the additional passenger are included in determining the aggregate incremental cost. Spouses of NEOs occasionally fly on the corporate aircraft as additional passengers on business flights. In those cases, there is no incremental cost to Quanta, and as a result, no amount is reflected in the table.

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

50

52


Executive Compensation

 

(7)

The amounts shown reflect the sum of the following columns: “Salary,” Stock Awards – Total,” “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” and “All Other Compensation.” For a summary of the total compensation excluding equity awards with respect to the 2013 performance year, please see the Supplemental Table for 2014 Executive Compensation within footnote (13) below.

(8)

Effective January 1, 2013, Mr. Austin was appointed Chief Operating Officer. Prior to this appointment, he served as President – Electric Power Division and Natural Gas & Pipeline Division.

(9)

Effective May 17, 2012, Mr. Jensen was appointed Chief Financial Officer. Prior to this appointment, he served as Senior Vice President – Finance, Administration and Chief Accounting Officer.

(10)

Effective January 6, 2014, Mr. Morris was appointed as Executive Vice President – Corporate Development. Prior to his appointment, he was not an employee of Quanta.

(11)

Effective September 19, 2014, Mr. Kemps was appointed as Executive Vice President and General Counsel. Prior to his appointment, he was not an employee of Quanta.

(12)

Effective February 20, 2014, Mr. Brown was appointed as Vice President and General Counsel. Prior to his appointment, he was not an employee of Quanta. Due to the termination of Mr. Brown’s employment, effective as of September 15, 2014, all unvested equity-based awards to Mr. Brown were forfeited, which included the entire amount reflected under the “Stock Awards – Total” column for Mr. Brown. Additionally, pursuant to Mr. Brown’s severance agreement, effective as of September 15, 2014, and as more fully described above in “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Executive Separation Matters,” he remained eligible to receive a pro rata portion of the amount payable to him under the 2014 annual incentive plan. Further details regarding the payouts to Mr. Brown under the 2014 annual incentive plan are discussed under “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Annual Incentive Plan.” The cash amount earned by Mr. Brown under the 2014 annual incentive plan is reflected under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column.

(13)

In March 2014, Quanta adopted an entirely new plan design for granting long-term equity awards (the 2014 long-term incentive plan), which prospectively replaced the supplemental incentive plan for the 2013 performance year. Under the 2013 supplemental incentive plan and in accordance with past practice, Quanta granted RSUs to Messrs. O’Neil, Austin and Jensen in March 2014 with respect to their performance during the2013 performance year (granted following publication of the 2013 audited financial statements). Under the new 2014 long-term incentive plan, Quanta granted RSUs and performance units to Messrs. O’Neil, Austin and Jensen in March 2014 with vesting and payouts to occur based on continued employment and, with respect to performance units, performance infuture years (granted at the beginning of a 3-year performance period ending December 31, 2016). See “Changes to Executive Compensation Implemented for 2014 – Recognition of Transitional Disclosure Implications Associated with Changes Implemented.” The grant date fair value of all of these awards is included in the “Stock Awards” columns.

Recognizing that the required presentation in the 2014 Summary Compensation Table reflects equity-based awards granted to Messrs. O’Neil, Austin and Jensen during 2014 for both the 2013 performance year and for 2014, including performance units based on the 3-year performance period ending 2016, Quanta has provided the following Supplemental Table for 2014 Executive Compensation, which excludes (i) awards in respect of the 2013 performance year under the 2013 supplemental incentive plan and (ii) RSUs granted as payment for the special transaction bonus related to the sale of HEP in the 2013 performance year.

Supplemental Table for 2014 Executive Compensation

     Stock Awards       
   Year      Salary   
($)
   Performance  
Units
($)
      RSUs     
($)
      Total     
($)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
  Compensation  
($)
   All Other  
Compen-
sation

($)
      Total     
($)
 

James F. O’Neil III

 2014   987,500   1,962,534   1,962,534   3,925,068    775,885    66,905    5,755,358   

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.

 2014   781,250   671,400   671,400   1,342,800    564,280    59,079    2,747,409   

Derrick A. Jensen

 2014   537,500   516,475   516,475   1,032,950    384,093    47,390    2,001,933   

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

53


Executive Compensation

 

20132014 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The following table sets forth information concerning annual cash incentive awards for 20132014 and RSUequity-based awards granted during 20132014 to each of the NEOs under Quanta’s non-equity and equity incentive plans.

 

                          All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units(3)
(#)
  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
  Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
On Grant
Date
($/sh)
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards(4)
($)
 
                             

Name

 Grant
Date
  Approval
Date
  Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)
  Estimated Possible Payments
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
     
   Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
     

James F. O’Neil III

          237,500    950,000    1,900,000                              
  03/08/13    03/06/13                225,000    1,800,000    2,700,000                3,014,556  

John R. Colson

          225,000    900,000    1,800,000                              
  03/08/13    03/06/13                225,000    1,800,000    2,700,000                3,014,556  

Earl C. (Duke) Austin Jr.

          181,250    725,000    1,450,000                              
  01/02/13    12/20/12                            9,313            259,926  
  03/08/13    03/06/13                87,500    700,000    1,050,000                1,172,316  

James H. Haddox

          61,565    246,261    492,522                              
  03/08/13    03/06/13                62,500    500,000    750,000                837,369  

Derrick A. Jensen

          112,500    450,000    900,000                              
  03/08/13    03/06/13                53,125    425,000    637,500                711,771  

Nicholas M. Grindstaff

          33,153    132,613    265,226                              
  03/08/13    03/06/13                15,625    125,000    187,500                207,226  

Peter B. O’Brien

          30,900    123,600    247,200                              
  03/08/13    03/06/13                12,500    100,000    150,00                201,269  
               Estimated Possible Payments
Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards
 All
Other

Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares

of Stock
or Units
(#)
 Grant
Date

Fair
Value

of Stock
and
Option

Awards(5)
($)
 
          Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
 2013 SIP(3) 2014 LTIP(4) 

Name

 Grant
Date
 Approval
Date
 Incentive
Plan /
Year
 Grant
Type(1)
 Threshold
($)
Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
 

O’Neil

        2014 AIP 1,100,000   3,630,000                          
 03/12/14   03/04/14  2013 SIPRSU       350,000   2,800,000   4,200,000               4,193,641  
 03/12/14   03/04/14  2014 LTIPPU                13,837   55,345   110,690      1,962,534  
 03/12/14   03/04/14  2014 LTIPRSU                         55,345(6)  1,962,534  
 03/12/14   03/04/14  2013(7)RSU                         11,652(7)  413,180  

Austin

      2014 AIP 800,000   2,640,000                          
 03/12/14   03/04/14  2013 SIPRSU       125,000   1,000,000   1,500,000               1,523,539  
 03/12/14   03/04/14  2014 LTIPPU                4,734   18,934   37,868      671,400  
 03/12/14   03/04/14  2014 LTIPRSU                         18,934(6)  671,400  
 03/12/14   03/04/14  2013(7)RSU                         14,565(7)  516,475  

Jensen

      2014 AIP 550,000   1,815,000                          
 03/12/14   03/04/14  2013 SIPRSU       87,500   700,000   1,050,000               1,066,495  
 03/12/14   03/04/14  2014 LTIPPU                3,642   14,565   29,130      516,475  
 03/12/14   03/04/14  2014 LTIPRSU                         14,565(6)  516,475  
 03/12/14   03/04/14  2013(7)RSU                         5,826(7)  206,590  

Morris

      2014 AIP 387,499   1,278,747                          
 03/12/14   03/04/14  2014 LTIPPU                1,275   5,098   10,196      180,775  
 03/12/14   03/04/14  2014 LTIPRSU                         5,098(6)  180,775  
 01/22/14   01/22/14  2014(8)RSU                         15,949(8)  512,601  

Kemps

      2014 AIP 114,288   377,150                          
 12/03/14   12/03/14  2014 LTIPPU                1,592   6,366   12,732      189,516  
 12/03/14   12/03/14  2014 LTIPRSU                         6,366(6)  189,516  
 09/19/14   09/10/14  2014(9)RSU                         8,181(9)  302,779  

Brown(10)

      2014 AIP 248,157   818,918                          
 03/12/14   03/04/14  2014 LTIPPU                1,093   4,369   8,738      154,925  
 03/12/14   03/04/14  2014 LTIPRSU                         4.369(6)  154,925  
 03/04/14   03/04/14  2014RSU                         4,584   164,382  

 

(1)

Types of awards include RSUs and performance units (PUs).

(2)

The amounts shown represent threshold, target and maximum awards that could be earned by the NEOs under the 20132014 annual incentive plan based on 20132014 base salary rates. There is no threshold award amount applicable to the 2014 annual incentive plan. The thresholdmaximum value representsincludes an exemplary award, payable in RSUs that vest over three years, which may be awarded if warranted under the lowest amount that could be earnedAIP Company Performance Component. The amounts shown for Messrs. Kemps and Morris are pro-rated based on the performance/payout scale described above inportion of the fiscal year during which they were employed, and the amount shown for Mr. Brown is pro-rated based on the terms of his severance agreement. For further details regarding this plan, see “Compensation Discussion and& Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for the 2013 Performance Year2014 – Annual Incentive Plan,Plan. although the minimum payout is zero. Actual payouts under the 20132014 annual incentive plan were finally determined in March 20142015 and are reflected in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the 20132014 Summary Compensation Table.

 

(2)(3)

The amounts shown represent the threshold, target and maximum dollar amount of RSU awards that could be granted to Messrs. O’Neil, Austin and Jensen in 2014 for the 2013 toperformance year under the NEOs as determined pursuant to the 20122013 supplemental incentive plan. The threshold value represents the lowest amount that could be earned based on the performance/payout scale for the ROE Componentcompany performance component although the minimum payout is zero. Actual awards under the 2013 supplemental incentive plan were finally determined in March 2014 and are included in the “Stock Awards – Restricted Stock & RSUs” column of the 2014 Summary Compensation Table.

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

54


Executive Compensation

(4)

The amounts shown represent the number of shares of Common Stock that could be earned with respect to performance units granted under the 2014 long-term incentive plan. The number of performance units that will become earned and vest, and the resulting number of shares of Common Stock to be issued, will be determined as soon as administratively practicable after completion of the 3-year performance period ending December 31, 2016, and the number of shares can range from 0% to a maximum of 200% of the target number. Performance units are described above in further detail under “Compensation Discussion and& Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for the 2013 Performance Year2014SupplementalLong-Term Incentive Plan. although the minimum payout is zero.

 

(3)

The amount shown represents restricted stock granted to Mr. Austin in connection with his promotion to Chief Operating Officer effective January 1, 2013. Such award vests in equal annual installments over a three-year period (assuming continued employment), subject to the terms and conditions of the applicable award agreement.

(4)(5)

The amounts shown reflect the aggregate grant date fair value (based on the closing price of Quanta’s common stockCommon Stock on the date of grant) of restricted stockRSUs or RSUsperformance units granted during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20132014 to the NEOs, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. With respect to the RSUs granted under the 2013 supplemental incentive plan and the 2014 long-term incentive plan, awards vest in three equal annual installments, assuming the NEO continues to meet the requirements for vesting, and the initial vesting occurred in the first quarter of 2015. With respect to the RSUs related to the special transaction bonuses, awards vest in three equal annual installments, assuming the NEO continues to meet the requirements for vesting, and the initial vesting occurred in the first quarter of 2014. With respect to the performance units granted under the 2014 long-term incentive plan, the amount represents the grant date fair value of the target award. The number of performance units that will become earned and vest, and the resulting number of shares of Common Stock to be issued, can range from 0% to a maximum of 200% of the target number. These awards are described in further detail under “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Long-Term Incentive Plan.” The value ultimately realized by the NEO upon the actual vesting of the award(s) may orRSU and performance unit awards may not be equal to this determined value.

(6)

The average of the closing prices of Quanta’s common stock for the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of grant was used to determineamounts shown represent the number of RSUs or shares of restricted stock granted. All of such awardsthat were granted to all the NEOs under the 2014 long-term incentive plan. The RSUs awarded vest over three years in equal annual installments, overassuming the NEO continues to meet the requirements for vesting, and the initial vesting occurred in the first quarter of 2015. For further details regarding the 2014 long-term incentive plan and its components, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Long-Term Incentive Plan.”

(7)

The amounts shown represent awards related to special transaction bonuses paid in the form of RSUs granted to certain executives in March 2014, in recognition of the contributions of these executives in connection with the Quanta’s strategic investment in HEP, which was sold by Quanta in 2013. These RSU awards vest in three equal annual installments, assuming the NEO continues to meet the requirements for vesting, and the initial vesting occurred in the first quarter of 2014. For a three-year period (assuming continued employment), subjectdiscussion of the special transaction bonuses, please read“Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Transaction Bonuses.”

(8)

The amount shown represents an award in the form of RSUs granted in connection with Mr. Morris’ appointment as Executive Vice President – Corporate Development of Quanta in January 2014. The RSUs vest in three equal annual installments, assuming Mr. Morris continues to meet the vesting requirements, and the initial vesting occurred in the first quarter of 2015.

(9)

The amount shown represents an award in the form of RSUs granted in connection with Mr. Kemps’ appointment as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Quanta in September 2014. The RSUs vest in three equal annual installments, assuming Mr. Kemps continues to meet the vesting requirements, and the initial vesting will occur in the fourth quarter of 2015.

(10)

Due to the termstermination of Mr. Brown’s employment, effective as of September 15, 2014, all unvested equity-based awards to Mr. Brown were forfeited, which included: (i) 4,584 RSUs granted upon his initial employment; (ii) 4,369 RSUs granted in connection with the 2014 long-term incentive plan; and conditions(iii) 4,369 performance units granted in connection with the 2014 long-term incentive plan. Pursuant to Mr. Brown’s severance agreement and as more fully described in “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Executive Separation Matters,” he remained eligible to receive a pro rata portion of the applicablecash bonus award agreements. All RSU awards with a March 8, 2013 grant date represent awards earnedpayable to him under the 2012 supplemental2014 annual incentive plan. Further details regarding the payouts to Mr. Brown under the 2014 annual incentive plan are discussed in “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Annual Incentive Plan.”

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

51

55


Executive Compensation

 

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20132014 Fiscal Year-End

The following table reflects outstanding option awards classified as exercisable or unexercisable, as well as restricted stock, RSUs and unearnedperformance units classified as unvested or unearned/unvested as of December 31, 20132014 for each of the NEOs. The table also reflects unvested restricted stock or RSU awards held by each of the NEOs, assumingassumes a market value of $31.56$28.39 per share, the closing price of Quanta’s common stockCommon Stock on December 31, 2013.2014.

 

Option AwardsStock Awards

Name
 Option Awards Stock Awards 

Name

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
 Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of

Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested(1)
(#)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units
Or Other
Rights

That Have
Not Vested(2)
($)
 

James F. O’Neil III

                262,918 (3)  7,464,242   55,345   1,571,245  

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.

                113,332 (4)  3,217,495   18,934   537,536  

Derrick A. Jensen

                72,613 (5)  2,061,483   14,565   413,500  

Jesse E. Morris

                21,047 (6)  597,524   5,098   144,732  

Steven J. Kemps

                14,547 (7)  412,989   6,366   180,731  

Eric B. Brown(8)

                           

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number  of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of

Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units
Or Other
Rights

That Have
Not Vested
($)

James F. O’Neil III

— — 137,898 (1)4,352,061— —  

John R. Colson

— —  (2)— —  

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.

— — 70,764 (3)2,233,312— —  

James H. Haddox

— — 45,060 (4)1,422,094— —  

Derrick A. Jensen

— — 43,936 (5)1,386,620— —  

Nicholas M. Grindstaff

— — 11,220 (6)354,103— —  

Peter B. O’Brien

— — 8,533 (7)269,301— —  

 

(1)

Includes unvested awardsThe amounts shown represent the number of restricted stock or RSUs covering (i) 52,117 shares of Common Stock that vested on February 28, 2014; (ii) 4,241could be earned with respect to performance units granted under the 2014 long-term incentive plan, assuming the target number is earned and vested. The number of performance units that will become earned and vest, and the resulting number of shares that vest on May 28, 2014; (iii) 47,465of Common Stock to be issued, will be determined as soon as administratively practicable after completion of the 3-year performance period ending December 31, 2016, and the number of shares that vest on February 28, 2015; and (iv) 34,075 shares that vest on February 28, 2016.can range from 0% to a maximum of 200% of the target number. Performance units are described in further detail under“Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Long-Term Incentive Plan.”

 

(2)

Effective May 23, 2013,The amounts shown represent the date of Mr. Colson’s retirement as Executive Chairman of Quanta, forfeiture restrictions were waived and vesting was accelerated for unvested awards of restricted stock and RSUs held by Mr. Colson covering an aggregate of 159,165 shares, with an aggregate market value of $4,679,451, based onshares of Common Stock that could be earned with respect to performance units assuming the market value of Quanta’s common stock as of 12:01 a.m. on May 23, 2013 of $29.40 per share.target number is earned and vested.

 

(3)

Includes unvested awards of restricted stock or RSUs covering (i) 29,042109,218 shares that vested on February 28, 2014;2015; (ii) 25,36695,829 shares that vest on February 28, 2015;2016; and (iii) 16,35657,871 shares that vest on February 28, 2016.2017.

 

(4)

Includes unvested awards of restricted stock or RSUs covering (i) 19,99350,853 shares that vested on February 28, 2014; and2015; (ii) 25,06741,845 shares that vestedvest on March 31, 2014, the date of Mr. Haddox’s retirement as Executive Vice President of Quanta.February 28, 2016; and (iii) 20,634 shares that vest on February 28, 2017.

 

(5)

Includes unvested awards of restricted stock or RSUs covering (i) 15,35729,834 shares that vested on February 28, 2014;2015; (ii) 4,492 shares that vest on May 28, 2014; (iii) 13,012 shares that vest on February 28, 2015; (iv) 3,029 shares that vest on May 28, 2015; and (v) 8,046(iii) 24,869 shares that vest on February 28, 2016.2016; and (iv) 14,881 shares that vest on February 28, 2017.

 

(6)

Includes unvested awards of restricted stock or RSUs covering (i) 5,0017,014 shares that vested on February 28, 2014;2015; and (ii) 3,8767,016 shares that vest on February 28, 2015;2016; and (iii) 2,3437,017 shares that vest on February 28, 2016.2017.

 

(7)

Includes unvested awards of restricted stock or RSUs covering (i) 3,3692,122 shares that vested on February 28, 2014;2015; (ii) 2,8892,727 shares that vest on August 28, 2015; (iii) 2,122 shares that vest on February 28, 2015; and (iii) 2,2752016; (iv) 2,727 shares that vest on August 28, 2016; (v) 2,122 shares that vest on February 28, 2016.2017; and (vi) 2,727 shares that vest on August 28, 2017.

(8)

Due to the termination of Mr. Brown’s employment, effective as of September 15, 2014, all unvested equity-based awards to Mr. Brown were forfeited, which included: (i) 4,584 unvested RSUs granted upon his initial employment; (ii) 4,369 RSUs granted under the 2014 long-term incentive plan; and (iii) 4,369 performance units granted under the 2014 long-term incentive plan.

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

52

56


Executive Compensation

 

 

20132014 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

The following table reflects certain information regarding the exercise of options and the vesting of stock awards by each of our NEOs during the 20132014 fiscal year:

 

   Option Awards   Stock Awards 

Name

      Number of Shares    
Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
       Value Realized    
on Exercise
($)
       Number of Shares    
Acquired
on Vesting(1)
(#)
      Value Realized    
on  Vesting(2)
($)
 

James F. O’Neil III

             29,232 (3)   823,143  

John R. Colson

             220,552 (4)   6,400,742  

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.

             18,535     519,721  

James H. Haddox

             17,570     492,663  

Derrick A. Jensen

             15,146 (5)   428,376  

Nicholas M. Grindstaff

             3,772     105,767  

Peter B. O’Brien

             1,788     50,136  
Option AwardsStock Awards

Name

Number of Shares
Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
Value Realized
on Exercise
($)
Number of Shares
Acquired
on Vesting(1)
(#)
Value Realized
on Vesting(2)
($)

James F. O’Neil III

60,241 (3)2,107,545

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.

33,896 (4)1,191,990

Derrick A. Jensen

21,790 (5)758,919

Jesse E. Morris

—    

Steven J. Kemps

—    

Eric B. Brown

—    

 

(1)

Shares acquired on vesting include shares associated with restricted stock or RSU awards for which restrictions lapsed during fiscal 2013. Except as otherwise indicated, all such awards vested on February 28, 2013, and the market value of Quanta’s common stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $28.04 per share.year 2014.

 

(2)

The value realized reflects the taxable value to the NEO as of the date of the vesting of a restricted stock or RSU award. The actual value ultimately realized by the NEO may be more or less than the value realized as calculated in the above table, depending on whether and when the NEO held or sold the stock associated with the vesting occurrence.

 

(3)

Includes 4,241(i) 52,117 shares for Mr. O’Neil that vested on MayFebruary 28, 2013, and the2014 (the market value of Quanta’s common stockCommon Stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $28.86$35.01 per share.

(4)

Includes 159,165share); (ii) 3,883 shares for Mr. Colson that vested on May 23, 2013, and theMarch 28, 2014 (the market value of Quanta’s common stockCommon Stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $29.40$36.10 per share. The Compensation Committee approved the waiver of forfeiture restrictionsshare); and accelerated the vesting of all unvested awards of restricted stock and RSUs held by Mr. Colson as of May 23, 2013, the date of his retirement.

(5)

Includes 4,491(iii) 4,241 shares for Mr. Jensen that vested on May 28, 2013, and the2014 (the market value of Quanta’s common stockCommon Stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $28.86$33.66 per share.share).

(4)

Includes (i) 29,042 shares that vested on February 28, 2014 (the market value of Quanta’s Common Stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $35.01 per share) and (ii) 4,854 shares that vested on March 28, 2014 (the market value of Quanta’s Common Stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $36.10 per share).

(5)

Includes (i) 15,357 shares that vested on February 28, 2014 (the market value of Quanta’s Common Stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $35.01 per share); (ii) 1,941 shares that vested on March 28, 2014 (the market value of Quanta’s Common Stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $36.10 per share); and (iii) 4,492 shares that vested on May 28, 2014 (the market value of Quanta’s Common Stock as of 12:01 a.m. on that date was $33.66 per share).

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

53

57


Executive Compensation

 

2014 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

The following table describes the nonqualified deferred compensation activity for each of our NEOs during fiscal year 2014:

 

Name

 NEO
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year(1)
($)
 Company
Contribution
in Last
Fiscal
Year(2)
($)
 Aggregate
Earnings
(Losses)
in Last
Fiscal
Year(3)
($)
 Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
 Aggregate
Balance at
Last Fiscal
Year-End
($)
 

James F. O’Neil III

 141,158     33,750     306   —     175,214    

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.

 69,857     27,000     110   —     96,967    

Derrick A. Jensen

 47,796     18,563     2   —     66,361    

Jesse E. Morris

 130,943     —     (30 —     130,913    

Steven J. Kemps

 —     —        —     —    

Eric B. Brown

 23,920     —     15   —     23,935    

(1)

The amounts shown are included in the 2014 Summary Compensation Table in the “Salary” and “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns. For a discussion of Quanta’s nonqualified deferred compensation plan for certain employees, including the NEOs, please read “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Deferred Compensation Plan.”

(2)

The amounts shown are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the 2014 Summary Compensation Table, as detailed in the 2014 All Other Compensation Table within footnote (6) to the 2014 Summary Compensation Table. The amounts represent Quanta’s matching contributions that would have been allocated to a participant’s 401(k) plan account, but for applicable limits under the Internal Revenue Code. For additional information on these contributions, see“Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Deferred Compensation Plan.”

(3)

The amounts shown are not included in the 2014 Summary Compensation Table because earnings under Quanta’s nonqualified deferred compensation plan were not above-market or preferential.

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

58


Fees of the Compensation Committee Consultant

As discussed in“Compensation Discussion and& Analysis – Compensation Philosophy and Process – UseRole of Compensation Benchmarking Studies”Consultant,” above, the Compensation Committee independently retained Deloitte in 20132014 to provide benchmarking data, review the competitiveness of Quanta’s executive compensation for the NEOs, and provide advice on the amount and form of executive compensation. Management supported, but did not make or recommend, the decision to engage Deloitte. Deloitte was also engaged to provide certain additional services to Quanta.

Our Governance and Nominating Committee separately engaged Deloitte during 20132014 to provide benchmarking data, to review and reviewcomment on the competitiveness of Quanta’s non-employee director compensation, particularly with respect toincluding compensation for significant additional time on board-related services performed by a non-executive Chairman of the Board. Deloitte’s engagement also included a benchmarking study providing market data for director, and executive officer stock ownership guidelines, including prevalence of specific ownership multiples, types of equity includedto provide an update on trends and recent developments in ownership, and time periods to meet requirements.non-employee director compensation. Additionally, management has engaged Deloitte from time to time to provide tax, transaction and management advisory services and valuation assessments.

The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte and its affiliates for services performed during 20132014 were as follows:

 

$280,062305,193 for (i) services for the Compensation Committee regarding executive compensation matters, such as providing benchmarking data, reviewing Quanta’s incentive compensation plans, and participating in certain Compensation Committee meetings, and (ii) services for the Governance and Nominating Committee regarding non-employee director compensation and director and executive officer stock ownership guidelines;compensation;

 

$1,060,8581,268,154 for tax advisory services provided to Quanta, including (i) U.S. federal corporate income tax on-call engagements, (ii) tax return review services, (iii) Canadian federal and provincial tax return preparation and related assistance with ASC740 income tax accounting for Canadian operations, (iv) documentation of transfer pricing methodologies, (v) sales and use tax advisory services, (vi) tax return preparation services provided to Quanta and certain employees of Quanta in connection with international assignments, and (vii) Australian tax return preparation and compliance matters;

 

$546,485528,617 for tax and valuation advisory services provided to Quanta, including due diligence services, in connection with various business acquisitions, dispositions and restructuring transactions; and

 

$15,000 for valuation services provided to Quanta in connection with ASC350 goodwill impairment testing.

To prevent the perception of a potential conflict of interest involving Deloitte and its affiliates, (i) the individuals from Deloitte Tax LLP who provided the tax services to Quanta were not the same individuals who provided the consulting services to the Compensation Committee, (ii) the Deloitte consultants who provided services to the Compensation Committee assured the Committee that no portion of their compensation would be based on the amount or level of tax services provided by Deloitte Tax LLP, or any other services provided by Deloitte’s affiliates, to Quanta, (iii) the Deloitte consultants who provided services to the Compensation Committee do not own any stock in Quanta or otherwise provide any other services to Quanta, other than consulting services to the Compensation Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee, and (iv) the Deloitte compensation consultants have no business or personal relationships with members of the Compensation Committee or Quanta’s executive officers.

The Compensation Committee approved the services and related fees above to the extent related to executive compensation. The Compensation Committee did not review or approve the other services provided by Deloitte and its affiliates to Quanta, as the decision to engage Deloitte to perform these other services was made by another Board committee or by management in the normal course of business.

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

54


Executive Compensation

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The material features of our equity compensation plans are described in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of Part II of Quanta’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2013 with respect to our equity compensation plans, all of which have received stockholder approval.

 

    LOGO

Plan category

Number of Securities
to be Issued
Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
    Warrants and Rights    
(a)
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
    of Outstanding Options,    
Warrants and Rights
(b)
    Number of Securities Remaining    
Available for Future Issuance
Under Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))
(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

1,455,326 (1)$13.56 (2)9,253,901 (3)

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

  2015 Proxy Statement

 

Total

1,455,326 (1)$        13.569,253,901 (3)

59
  

(1)

Includes (i) 154,718 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options that were assumed in connection with Quanta’s acquisition of InfraSource on August 30, 2007, and (ii) 1,300,608 shares issuable in connection with unvested RSUs.

(2)

Excludes RSUs because those awards do not have exercise prices.

(3)

Includes 223,582 shares of common stock issuable as of December 31, 2013 under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Plan”), which provides that the aggregate amount of common stock with respect to which stock options or restricted stock may be awarded may not exceed 4,000,000 shares, and 9,030,319 shares of common stock issuable as of December 31, 2013 under the Omnibus Plan, which provides that the aggregate amount of common stock with respect to which equity awards may be granted may not exceed 11,750,000 shares.


Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

Employment Agreements

Quanta is (or was, in the case of one former executives)executive) a party to an employment agreement (as amended, an “Employment Agreement”) with each of our NEOs other than Mr. O’Brien.NEOs. Under the terms of our employment agreements, the executive is entitled to payments and benefits upon the occurrence of specified events, including termination of employment or change in control of Quanta. The specific terms of these arrangements, as well as an estimate of the compensation that would have been payable had they been triggered as of fiscal year-end, are described below. The termination of employment provisions of the employment agreements provide these individuals with a fixed amount of compensation upon termination as an inducement to offset the potential risk of leaving their prior employer or foregoing other opportunities in order to join or maintain employment with us, as applicable. At the time of entering into these agreements, the Compensation Committee considered our aggregate potential obligations in the context of the desirability of hiring or maintaining the employment of the individual, as applicable, and the expected compensation upon joining or maintaining employment with us, as applicable.

The Employment Agreements with Messrs. O’Neil, Austin and Jensenour NEOs have an initial term of two years that will subsequently renew automatically for a one-year term unless Quanta or the executive provides at least six months’ prior written notice of non-renewal. The Employment Agreement with Mr. Grindstaff renews automatically each year for an additional one-year term.

The Employment Agreement with Mr. Colson had an initial term of two years, with automatic renewals for additional one-year periods unless either party provided at least six months’ prior written notice of non-renewal. Mr. Colson retired as Executive Chairman of Quanta effective May 23, 2013, and his employment agreement with Quanta is now terminated.

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

55


Executive Compensation

The Employment Agreement with Mr. Haddox had a term beginning May 17, 2012 and continuing through March 31, 2014, with the period from the effective date through March 31, 2013 being the “initial term” and the period from April 1, 2013 through March 31, 2014 being the “transition term.” Mr. Haddox retired as Executive Vice President of Quanta effective March 31, 2014. The Employment Agreement with Mr. Haddox provided that all outstanding awards of restricted stock or RSUs held by Mr. Haddox were to vest as of the earlier of (i) March 31, 2014, provided Mr. Haddox remained employed by the Company as of such date, or (ii) termination of employment without “cause” (as defined in the Employment Agreement).

Under the Employment Agreements, the applicable NEOs are eligible to receive base salary, as well as bonuses and benefits, and, at the Compensation Committee’s discretion, may be entitled to participate in any other compensation, perquisite, incentive or retirement plans, policies and arrangements that are provided generally to our other executive officers. The Employment Agreements contain customary non-competition covenants restricting the ability of the NEOs to compete with Quanta during the term of their employment and for a period of two years thereafter, with respect to Messrs. O’Neil, Colson, Austin, Haddox and Jensen and one year thereafter with respect to Mr. Grindstaff, and prohibiting them from disclosing confidential information and trade secrets. If Quanta notifies Mr. O’Neil, Colson, Austin, Haddox or Jensenan NEO that it will not renew his Employment Agreement and he remains employed through the end of the employment term, the covenants restricting competition and solicitation of customers and employees apply for a reduced period of one year following the notice of non-renewal.

The Employment Agreements generally terminate upon the NEO’s (i) death, (ii) disability, (iii) termination by Quanta for “cause” (as defined in the Employment Agreements and generally described below), (iv) resignation or voluntary termination by the executive, (v) termination by Quanta without cause, or (vi) termination by the executive for “good reason” within twelve months following a “change in control” (as these terms are defined in the Employment Agreements). In addition, the Employment Agreements entitle the executives to certain payments upon other events associated with a change in control.

Upon termination of employment, each applicablecontinuing NEO would be entitled to all compensation earned and all benefits and reimbursements due through the date of termination, and with respect only to Mr. Grindstaff, any gross-up payments for related excise taxes.termination. The Employment Agreements entered into during 2011 with Messrs. O’Neil and Colson and the Employment Agreements entered into during 2012 with Messrs. Austin, Haddox and Jensenour NEOs do not contain excise tax gross-up provisions, as the Compensation Committee no longer offered this benefit when Quanta entered into these agreements. In the event Messrs. O’Neil, Colson, Austin, Haddox or Jensenany of the continuing NEOs become subject to the excise tax, their severance payments will be reduced to the minimum extent necessary (but in no event less than zero) to avoid application of the excise tax, except that the full severance payments shallwill be made if, after payment by the executive of the excise tax and all other taxes, the executive would retain a greater after-tax severance benefit without such reduction. Under the legacy Employment Agreement entered into in 2000 with Mr. Grindstaff, if benefits to which he becomes entitled are subject to excise taxes under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, then he generally will be entitled to an additional payment in an amount equal to the excise tax imposed plus any federal, state and local income taxes and additional excise taxes attributable to such payment.

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

56

60


Executive Compensation

 

 

Additionally, termination of employment and change in control events entitle applicable NEOs to severance payments and other benefits under the respective Employment Agreements as set forth below:

 

    Termination or Change in Control  Event    

  

Potential Payments

    Termination or Change in Control Event

O’Neil / Colson / Austin / Haddox / Jensen

Grindstaff

Termination upon death

  

None

None

Termination upon disability

  Lump-sum payment of one year base salary, subject to such NEO’s execution of a waiver and release agreementLump-sum payment of one year base salary at the rate then in effect

Termination by Quanta for cause

  None

Resignation or voluntary termination by the executive

  None

    Resignation or voluntary termination
by the executive

None

None

Termination by Quanta without cause
(other (other than within 12 months
following a change in control)

  

 

Lump-sum payment of two years of base salary, subject to such NEO’s execution of a waiver and release agreement

Lump-sum payment of one year base salary at the rate then in effect

Termination by Quanta without cause
within 12 months following a
change in control

  

 

Lump-sum payment equal to three times annual base salary plus three times the higher of the highest annual cash bonus paid for the three preceding years or the target annual cash bonus payable for the current year, and continuation of employee and dependent welfare benefit plan coverage (medical, dental and vision) for three years

Lump-sum payment equal to three times annual base salary

Termination by executive for good
reason within 12 months following a
change in control

Same as termination without cause within 12 months following a change in control

  

 

Same as termination without cause within 12 months following a change in control

Successor in change in control fails to
timely assume Quanta’s obligations
under the Employment

Agreement

  

 

None, but the executive may be entitled to terminate his employment for good reason

Same as termination without cause within 12 months following a change in control, but actual termination of employment is not required to trigger payment

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

57


Executive Compensation

Change in Control.  Under the Employment Agreements, of Messrs. O’Neil, Colson, Austin, Haddox and Jensen, a change in control generally occurs when (i) any person or entity acquires, directly or indirectly, the beneficial ownership of securities representing 50% or more of the total fair market value or total voting power of Quanta’s then outstanding voting securities, (ii) any person or entity acquires, directly or indirectly, within a 12-month period, the beneficial ownership of 30% or more of the total voting power of Quanta’s then outstanding voting securities, (iii) certain incumbent (and subsequently approved) directors cease to constitute a majority of the members of the Board within a 12-month period, or (iv) any person or entity acquires, directly or indirectly, within a 12-month period, assets representing 40% or more of the total gross fair market value of Quanta’s assets.

Under the Employment Agreement of Mr. Grindstaff, a change in control generally occurs when (i) any person or entity acquires, directly or indirectly, the beneficial ownership of securities representing 50% or more of the total voting power of Quanta’s then outstanding voting securities, (ii) certain incumbent (and subsequently approved) directors cease to constitute a majority of the members of the Board, (iii) the stockholders approve a merger, consolidation or reorganization of Quanta, or consummation of any such transaction if stockholder approval is not obtained, unless at least 75% of the total voting securities of the surviving entity outstanding immediately after such transaction are beneficially owned by at least 75% of the holders of outstanding voting securities of Quanta immediately prior to the transaction, or (iv) the stockholders approve a plan of complete liquidation or a sale or disposition of all or a substantial portion of Quanta’s assets.

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

61


Executive Compensation

Cause.The Employment Agreements of Messrs. O’Neil, Colson, Austin, Haddox and Jensen generally define cause as the executive’s (i) gross negligence in the performance of, intentional nonperformance of, or inattention to, material duties and responsibilities, which continues after receipt of written notice, (ii) willful dishonesty, fraud or material misconduct with respect to Quanta’s business, (iii) violation of Quanta’s policies or procedures, if not cured following written notice, (iv) conviction of, confession to, or guilty plea or plea of nolo contendere with respect to, an act of fraud, misappropriation or embezzlement or any felony or other crime that involves moral turpitude, (v) use of illegal substances or habitual drunkenness, or (vi) breach of the Employment Agreement if not cured following written notice.

The Employment Agreement of Mr. Grindstaff generally defines cause as the executive’s (i) willful, material and irreparable breach of the Employment Agreement, (ii) continuing gross negligence in the performance of or intentional nonperformance or inattention to material duties after notice of the same is given, (iii) willful dishonesty, fraud or material misconduct with respect to Quanta’s business, (iv) conviction of a felony, or (v) chronic alcohol or illegal drug abuse.

Good Reason.  The Employment Agreements of Messrs. O’Neil, Colson, Austin, Haddox and Jensen generally define good reason as (a)(i) to the extent occurring within twelve months following a change in control, (i)(a) the assignment to the executive (except for Mr. Haddox) of duties inconsistent with his position, authority or responsibilities as contemplated under his Employment Agreement, or any other action by the employer that results in a diminution in such position, authority or responsibilities, if not cured after written notice is given, (ii)(b) any material breach of the Employment Agreement by the employer, including any requirement that the executive relocate to another geographic location, (iii)(c) failure by the employer to comply with the compensation provisions of the Employment Agreement, if not cured after written notice is given, (iv)(d) failure by the employer to continue in effect any cash or stock-based incentive or bonus plan, retirement plan, welfare benefit plan or other compensation, retirement or benefit plan and policy except in certain specified circumstances, if not cured after written notice is given, or (v)(e) the executive’s receipt of notice of termination or non-renewal from the employer; or (b)(ii) the failure of the successor in a pending change in control to timely assume in writing the employer’s obligations under the Employment Agreement.

Good reason exists underAs described above in “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Executive Separation Matters,” the Employment Agreementemployment agreement formerly applicable to Mr. Brown was superseded by a severance agreement, effective September 15, 2014, documenting the terms of the termination of his employment with Quanta. Mr. Grindstaff if, within twelve months following a change in control,Brown’s employment agreement contained substantially similar terms to those described above for the executive is offered a “lesser position” (as defined in the Employment Agreement) or is required to relocate to another geographic location.

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

58


Executive Compensation

continuing NEOs.

Equity Incentive Plans

Generally, subject to the provisions of the particular award agreement, unvested shares of restricted stock or RSUs and unearned performance units granted pursuant to Quanta’s equity incentive plans are forfeited by the participant upon termination of such participant’s employment during the restriction period. However, unvested awards of restricted stock or RSUs generally become vested, and forfeiture restrictions lapse, upon the death of the participant during the participant’s continuous service or upon the occurrence of a “change in control” (as defined in the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Plan”) or the Omnibus Plan, as applicable)., (i) unvested awards of restricted stock or RSUs generally become vested, and forfeiture restrictions lapse and (ii) a portion of the participant’s unearned performance units granted under the Omnibus Plan become earned based on the achievement of the participant’s applicable performance goals as of the date of death or change in control and the forecasted achievement of such goals for the remainder of the performance period, as determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Additionally, with respect to unearned performance units, a participant who resigns prior to completion of the 3-year performance period may, at the discretion of the Chief Executive Officer and with approval of the Compensation Committee, earn a pro rata portion (based on the portion of the 3-year performance period during which the participant was employed) of the shares ultimately awarded in respect of unearned performance units under the long-term incentive plan upon determination of actual achievement levels.

Under the Stock Plan, a change in control is generally defined as the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) any person or entity becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities representing 50% or more of the voting power of Quanta’s then outstanding securities, (ii) as a result of, or in connection with, any tender offer, exchange offer, merger or other business combination, a majority of the Board as of the

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

62


Executive Compensation

date immediately preceding such transaction is replaced, (iii) Quanta is merged with another corporation, and as a result, less than 75% of the outstanding securities of the surviving entity is owned in the aggregate by Quanta’s former stockholders, (iv) a tender or exchange offer is consummated for 50% or more of the voting power of Quanta’s then outstanding securities, or (v) Quanta transfers substantially all of its assets to an entity that is not controlled by Quanta.

Under the Omnibus Plan, a change in control is generally deemed to occur upon (i) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of Quanta, (ii) any person or entity becoming the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities representing more than 50% of the voting power of Quanta’s then outstanding securities, (iii) certain incumbent (and subsequently approved) directors ceasing to constitute a majority of the members of the Board within a two-year period, (iv) consummation of a merger or other business combination, unless all or substantially all of the beneficial owners of outstanding voting securities of Quanta immediately prior to the transaction beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the voting power of the resulting entity immediately following the transaction, or (v) stockholder approval of a complete liquidation of Quanta.

Deferred Compensation

Generally, participants will receive distributions of deferred amounts under Quanta’s deferred compensation plan upon the earlier of separation from service, the occurrence of a disability, or a specified date (selected at the time of the deferral) and, subject to specific limitations, upon the occurrence of an unforeseeable financial emergency. The terms of Quanta’s deferred compensation plan are discussed in further detail under “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Deferred Compensation Plan.”

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

59

63


Executive Compensation

 

 

Estimated Potential Payments

The tables below reflect the estimated amounts that would be paid to each NEO other than Mr. Colson, upon termination of employment or change in control in varying circumstances identified below. Except as otherwise indicated, the amounts shown assume that termination or change in control occurred on December 31, 20132014 and reflect a market value for Quanta common stockCommon Stock of $31.56$28.39 per share, the closing price on such date. Actual amounts to be paid can be determined only upon occurrence of an actual termination or change in control. The tables below reflect actual payments for Mr. Colson in connection with his retirement effective May 23, 2013.

 

Name

 

Benefit

  Death     Disability     Termination by
Quanta for Cause or
Voluntary Termination
by Executive
(No  Change in Control)
 Termination by
Quanta without Cause
(No Change in Control)
 BenefitDeath   Disability   Termination by
Quanta for Cause or
Voluntary Termination
by Executive
(No  Change in Control)
 Termination by
Quanta without Cause
(No Change in Control)
 

James F. O’Neil III

 Severance  $—    $950,000   $—    $1,900,000  Severance$  $1,000,000  $                —  $2,000,000  
 Welfare Benefits (1)   —     —     —     —   
 Equity Benefit (2)   4,352,061    —     —     —   
 Gross-up/(Cut-back) (3)   —     —     —     —   
   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
 Total  $    4,352,061   $    950,000   $—    $          1,900,000  
   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

John R. Colson (4)

 Severance  $—    $—    $—    $—   
 Welfare Benefits (1)   —     —     —     —   Welfare Benefits(1)            
 Equity Benefit (2)   —     —    4,679,451    —   Equity Benefit(2) 9,035,487           
 Gross-up/(Cut-back) (3)   —     —     —     —   Gross-up/(Cut-back)(3)            
   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
 Total  $—    $—    $          4,679,451   $—   Total$9,035,487  $1,000,000  $  $            2,000,000  
   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.

 Severance  $—    $    725,000   $—    $1,450,000  Severance$  $800,000  $  $1,600,000  
 Welfare Benefits (1)   —     —     —     —   Welfare Benefits(1)            
 Equity Benefit (2)   2,233,312    —     —     —   Equity Benefit(2) 3,755,031           
 Gross-up/(Cut-back) (3)   —     —     —     —   Gross-up/(Cut-back)(3)            
   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
 Total  $    2,233,312   $    725,000   $—    $1,450,000  Total$3,755,031  $800,000  $  $1,600,000  
   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

James H. Haddox

 Severance  $—    $    273,623   $—    $547,246  
 Welfare Benefits (1)   —     —     —     —   
 Equity Benefit (2)   1,422,094    —     —     —   
 Gross-up/(Cut-back) (3)   —     —     —     —   
   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
 Total  $    1,422,094   $    273,623   $—    $547,246  
   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Derrick A. Jensen

 Severance  $—    $    500,000   $—    $1,000,000  Severance$  $550,000  $  $1,100,000  
 Welfare Benefits (1)   —     —     —     —   Welfare Benefits(1)            
 Equity Benefit (2)   1,386,620    —     —     —   Equity Benefit(2) 2,474,983           
 Gross-up/(Cut-back) (3)   —     —     —     —   Gross-up/(Cut-back)(3)            
   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
 Total  $    1,386,620   $    500,000   $—    $1,000,000  Total$2,474,983  $550,000  $  $1,100,000  
   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Nicholas M. Grindstaff

 Severance  $—    $    265,225   $—    $265,225  

Jesse E. Morris

Severance$  $437,750  $  $875,500  
 Welfare Benefits(1)   —     —     —     —   Welfare Benefits(1)            
 Equity Benefit (2)   354,103    —     —     —   Equity Benefit(2) 742,256           
 Gross-up/(Cut-back) (3)   —     —     —     —   Gross-up/(Cut-back)(3)            
   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
 Total  $354,103   $    265,225   $—    $265,225  Total$742,256  $437,750  $  $875,500  
   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Peter B. O’Brien

 Severance  $—    $—    $—    $—   

Steven J. Kemps

Severance$  $450,000  $  $900,000  
 Welfare Benefits (1)   —     —     —     —   Welfare Benefits(1)            
 Equity Benefit (2)   269,301    —     —     —   Equity Benefit(2) 593,720           
 Gross-up/(Cut-back) (3)   —     —     —     —   Gross-up/(Cut-back)(3)            
   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
 Total  $269,301   $—    $—    $—   Total$593,720  $450,000  $  $900,000  
   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Eric B. Brown(4)

Severance$292,500  
Pro Rata Incentive Award 173,300  
Welfare Benefits(1)   
Equity Benefit(2)   
Gross-up/(Cut-back)(3)   
     

 

 
Total$465,800  
     

 

 

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

64


Executive Compensation

 

(1)

Welfare benefits include an approximation of the cost of continued payment of insurance premiums for up to three years after termination. The insurance premium cost is based on the actual cost of premiums for 20142015 and the estimated costs of premiums for 20152016 and 2016.2017.

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

60


Executive Compensation

 

(2)

The equity benefit represents (i) the value of the unvested awards of restricted stock and RSUs held by the NEO as of December 31, 20132014 that would vest upon occurrence of the event except that for Mr. Colson, the equity benefit representsand (ii) the value of unvested awards of restricted stock and RSUsunearned performance units held by the NEO as of May 23, 2013,December 31, 2014. As of December 31, 2014, the NEOs held the following unearned performance units: 55,345 for Mr. O’Neil; 18,934 for Mr. Austin; 14,565 for Mr. Jensen; 5,098 for Mr. Morris; and 6,366 for Mr. Kemps. The actual number of unearned performance units that would become earned upon occurrence of the event is based on the achievement of the applicable performance goals as of the date onof the event and the forecasted achievement for the remainder of the performance period, which vesting was accelerated upon Mr. Colson’s retirement ascan range from 0% to a maximum of 200% of the number currently held, which is the target number. Performance units are described in further detail in“Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Chairman of Quanta. The market value of Quanta common stock as of 12:01 a.m. on May 23, 2013 was $29.40 per share.Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Long-Term Incentive Plan.”

 

(3)

The excise tax gross-up would be an additional payment in an amount equal to the excise tax imposed plus any federal, state and local income taxes and additional excise taxes attributable to such payment. The employment agreements with Quanta’s NEOs do not contain excise tax gross-up provisions. The cut-back would be the amount by which the severance payment is reduced, such that, after such reduction, no portion of the payments and benefits would be subject to the excise tax.

 

(4)

Mr. Colson retiredBrown resigned as Executive ChairmanVice President and General Counsel of Quanta on May 23, 2013.as of September 15, 2014. The table above reflects actual amounts paid to Mr. Colson uponBrown in connection with the termination of his retirementemployment, effective as of September 15, 2014, as more particularly described in“Compensation “Compensation Discussion and& Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for the 2013 Performance Year2014 – Executive SuccessionSeparation Matters.”

 

Name

BenefitSuccessor Fails to
Assume Agreement
Upon a Change in
Control
(No  Termination
of Employment)
 Termination by
Quanta without Cause
within 12 Months
Following a
Change in  Control (4)
 Termination by
Executive
for Good Reason
Within 12 months
Following  a
Change in Control (4)
 

James F. O’Neil III

Severance$  $8,244,000  $8,244,000  
Welfare Benefits(1)    45,336   45,336  
Equity Benefit(2) 9,035,487   9,035,487   9,035,487  
Gross-up/(Cut-back)(3)         
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Total$      9,035,487  $      17,324,823  $      17,324,823  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.

Severance$  $6,402,000  $6,402,000  
Welfare Benefits(1)    45,336   45,336  
Equity Benefit(2) 3,755,031   3,755,031   3,755,031  
Gross-up/(Cut-back)(3)         
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Total$3,755,031  $10,202,367  $10,202,367  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Derrick A. Jensen

Severance$  $4,134,000  $4,134,000  
Welfare Benefits(1)    45,336   45,336  
Equity Benefit(2) 2,474,983   2,474,983   2,474,983  
Gross-up/(Cut-back)(3)         
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Total$2,474,983  $6,654,319  $6,654,319  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Jesse E. Morris

Severance$  $2,495,175  $2,495,175  
Welfare Benefits(1)    52,538   52,538  
Equity Benefit(2) 742,256   742,256   742,256  
Gross-up/(Cut-back)(3)         
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Total$742,256  $3,289,969  $3,289,969  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Steven J. Kemps

Severance$  $2,565,000  $2,565,000  
Welfare Benefits(1)    52,538   52,538  
Equity Benefit(2) 593,720   593,720   593,720  
Gross-up/(Cut-back)(3)         
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Total$593,720  $3,211,258  $3,211,258  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

61

65


Executive Compensation

 

 

Name

 

Benefit

 Successor Fails to
Assume Agreement
Upon a Change in
Control
(No  Termination
of Employment)
  Termination by
Quanta without Cause
within 12 Months
Following a
Change  in Control (5)
  Termination by
Executive
for Good Reason
Within 12 months
Following  a
Change in Control (5)
 

James F. O’Neil III

 Severance $—    $7,651,500   $7,651,500  
 Welfare Benefits (1)  —    44,852    44,852  
 Equity Benefit (2)  4,352,061    4,352,061    4,352,061  
 Gross-up/(Cut-back) (3)  —     —     —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 Total $    4,352,061   $    12,048,413   $    12,048,413  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

John R. Colson (4)

 Severance $—    $—    $—   
 Welfare Benefits  —     —     —   
 Equity Benefit  —     —     —   
 Gross-up/(Cut-back)  —     —     —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 Total $—    $—    $—   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.

 Severance $—    $5,376,000   $5,376,000  
 Welfare Benefits (1)  —     44,852    44,852  
 Equity Benefit (2)  2,233,312    2,233,312    2,233,312  
 Gross-up/(Cut-back) (3)  —     —     —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 Total $2,233,312   $7,654,164   $7,654,164  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

James H. Haddox

 Severance $—    $3,650,403   $3,650,403  
 Welfare Benefits (1)  —     37,563    37,563  
 Equity Benefit (2)  1,422,094    1,422,094    1,422,094  
 Gross-up/(Cut-back) (3)  —     —     —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 Total $1,422,094   $5,110,060   $5,110,060  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Derrick A. Jensen

 Severance $—    $3,699,960   $3,699,960  
 Welfare Benefits (1)  —     44,852    44,852  
 Equity Benefit (2)  1,386,620    1,386,620    1,386,620  
 Gross-up/(Cut-back) (3)  —     —     —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 Total $1,386,620   $5,131,432   $5,131,432  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Nicholas M. Grindstaff

 Severance $795,675   $795,675   $795,675  
 Welfare Benefits (1)  —     —     —   
 Equity Benefit (2)  354,103    354,103    354,103  
 Gross-up/(Cut-back) (3)  —     —     —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 Total $1,149,778   $1,149,778   $1,149,778  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Peter B. O’Brien

 Severance $—    $—    $—   
 Welfare Benefits (1)  —     —     —   
 Equity Benefit (2)  269,301    269,301    269,301  
 Gross-up/(Cut-back) (3)  —     —     —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 Total $269,301   $269,301   $269,301  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

(1)

Welfare benefits include an approximation of the cost of continued payment of insurance premiums for up to three years after termination. The insurance premium cost is based on the actual cost of premiums for 20142015 and the estimated costs of premiums for 20152016 and 2016.2017.

 

(2)

The equity benefit represents (i) the value of the unvested awards of restricted stock and RSUs held by the NEO as of December 31, 20132014 that would vest upon occurrence of the event.event and (ii) the value of unearned performance units held by the NEO as of December 31, 2014. As of December 31, 2014, the NEOs held the following unearned performance units: 55,345 for Mr. O’Neil; 18,934 for Mr. Austin; 14,565 for Mr. Jensen; 5,098 for Mr. Morris; and 6,366 for Mr. Kemps. The actual number of unearned performance units that would become earned upon occurrence of the event is based on the achievement of the applicable performance goals as of the date of the event and the forecasted achievement for the remainder of the performance period, which can range from 0% to a maximum of 200% of the number currently held, which is the target number. Performance units are described in further detail in“Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Long-Term Incentive Plan.”

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

62


Executive Compensation

 

(3)

The excise tax gross-up would be an additional payment in an amount equal to the excise tax imposed plus any federal, state and local income taxes and additional excise taxes attributable to such payment. The employment agreements with Quanta’s NEOs do not contain excise tax gross-up provisions. The cut-back would be the amount by which the severance payment is reduced, such that, after such reduction, no portion of the payments and benefits would be subject to the excise tax.

 

(4)

Mr. Colson retired as Executive Chairman of Quanta on May 23, 2013. The table above reflects actual amounts paid to Mr. Colson upon his retirement as more particularly described in“Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for the 2013 Performance Year – Executive Succession Matters.”

(5)

With respect to termination by Quanta without cause within 12 months following a change in control, and with respect to termination by the executive for good reason within 12 months following a change in control, the equity benefit is triggered upon a change in control, and the remaining amounts are triggered upon termination of employment.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The material features of our equity compensation plans are described in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of Part II of Quanta’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2014 with respect to our equity compensation plans, all of which have received stockholder approval.

Plan Category

Number of Securities
to be Issued
Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(a)
 Weighted Average
Exercise Price
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(b)
 Number of Securities Remaining
Available for Future Issuance
Under Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))
(c)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

 2,005,862 (1) $14.53 (2)  7,922,846 (3) 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

         
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

 2,005,862 (1) $14.53   7,922,846 (3) 
    

 

 

��

(1)

Includes (i) 63,274 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options that were assumed in connection with Quanta’s acquisition of InfraSource on August 30, 2007, (ii) 1,807,544 shares issuable in connection with unvested RSUs and vested RSUs the settlement of which has been deferred, and (iii) 135,044 shares issuable in connection with a target amount of unearned and unvested awards of performance units under the Company’s long-term incentive plan that will vest on December 31, 2016 based upon the satisfaction of 3-year company performance metrics as described further in “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Executive Compensation Decisions for 2014 – Long-Term Incentive Plan.”

(2)

Excludes unvested RSUs, vested and deferred RSUs and performance units because those awards do not have exercise prices.

(3)

Includes (i) 225,658 shares of Common Stock issuable as of December 31, 2014 under the Stock Plan, which provides that the aggregate amount of Common Stock with respect to which stock options or restricted stock may be awarded may not exceed 4,000,000 shares, and (ii) 7,697,188 shares of Common Stock issuable as of December 31, 2014 under the Omnibus Plan, which provides that the aggregate amount of Common Stock with respect to which equity awards may be granted may not exceed 11,750,000 shares.

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

63

66


Certain Transactions

 

Related Party Transactions

Transactions Involving Executive Officers and Directors

North Houston Pole Line, L.P. (“North Houston”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Quanta, is a party to certain facility leases with Properties, Etc., a general partnership of which Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr., one of our executive officers, is a general partner and 50% owner. North Houston paid an aggregate of $355,980$378,889 to Properties, Etc. in rent expense for 20132014 related to these leases. These leases have various terms through September 2016, and as of December 31, 2013,2014, provided for aggregate remaining lease obligations of $840,380$650,738 through the conclusion of the lease terms. In addition, North Houston is a party to a facility lease with Mr. Austin and paid Mr. Austin $144,000 in rent expense for 20132014 related to this lease. As of December 31, 2013,2014, the aggregate remaining lease obligations under this lease were $377,419$233,419 through the conclusion of the lease term in August 2016. Further, North Houston is a party to a facility lease with Mr. Austin’s father and paid Mr. Austin’s father $180,000 in rent expense for 20132014 related to this lease.lease and incurred $85,523 in costs associated with necessary leasehold improvements during 2014. As of December 31, 2013,2014, the aggregate remaining lease obligations under this lease were $471,774$291,774 through the conclusion of the lease term in August 2016. These leases relate primarily to facilities that were occupied by North Houston when Quanta acquired North Houston in 2001. We believe that the rental rates of these leases do not exceed fair market value.

North HoustonQuanta employed Earl C. Austin,Travis Grindstaff, the fatherbrother of Earl C. (Duke) Austin, Jr.,Nicholas M. Grindstaff, one of our executive officers, during 2013. North Houston2014. Quanta paid Earl C. AustinTravis Grindstaff an aggregate of $998,855$183,373 in salary, non-equity incentive bonus, health and welfare coverage and 401(k) plan matching contributions and vehicle allowance for 2013.2014. In addition, during 2013,2014, we granted 437 RSUs to Earl C. Austin 3,273 RSUs,Travis Grindstaff, with a grant date fair value of $96,521,$15,496, vesting in three equal annual installments beginning in February 2014.2015. The RSUs were granted on the same terms and conditions as RSUs granted to other U.S. employees in 2013. North Houston’s employment of Earl C. Austin predated Quanta’s acquisition of North Houston in 2001.

Mears Group, Inc. (“Mears”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Quanta, employed Travis Grindstaff, the brother of Nicholas M. Grindstaff, one of our executive officers, from January to November 2013, and Quanta employed Travis Grindstaff during the remainder of 2013. Mears and Quanta paid Travis Grindstaff an aggregate of $153,720 in salary, non-equity incentive bonus, health and welfare coverage and 401(k) plan matching contributions for 2013. In addition, during 2013, we granted to Travis Grindstaff 525 RSUs, with a grant date fair value of $15,482, vesting in three equal annual installments beginning in February 2014. The RSUs were granted on the same terms and conditions as RSUs granted to other employees in 2013.

Quanta employed David J. Ball, the son of James R. Ball, one of our directors, during 2013.2014. Quanta paid David J. Ball an aggregate of $165,760$145,580 in salary, non-equity incentive bonus, health and welfare coverage and 401(k) plan matching contributions for 2013.2014. In addition, during 2013,2014, we granted 510 RSUs to David J. Ball, 595 RSUs, with a grant date fair value of $17,547,$18,085, vesting in three equal annual installments beginning in February 2014.2015. The RSUs were granted on the same terms and conditions as RSUs granted to other U.S. employees in 2013.2014.

Transactions Involving Holder of Series F Preferred Stock

Valard Construction LP (“Valard”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Quanta, and Valard Construction Ltd. (“Valard Ltd.”), an affiliate of Valard Construction LP (“Valard”) and aalso wholly-owned subsidiary of Quanta, is a partyare parties to certain facility leases with 964125 Alberta Ltd., a corporation controlled by the spouse of Victor Budzinski, holder in a trustee capacity of the single outstanding share of Quanta’s Series F Preferred Stock. Valard and Valard Ltd. paid an aggregate of $1,602,551$1,503,035 to 964125 Alberta Ltd. in rent expense for 20132014 related to these leases. These leases have various terms through April 30,October 31, 2018, and as of December 31, 2013,2014, provided for aggregate remaining lease obligations of $4,238,842$2,906,641 through the conclusion of the lease terms. These leases relate primarily to facilities that were occupied by Valard and Valard Ltd. when Quanta acquired Valard Ltd. in 2010. We believe that the rental rates of these leases do not exceed fair market value.

In addition, Valard Ltd. and Valard rent temporary camp housing facilities from 964125 Alberta Ltd. for certain crews working in remote areas at a specified rate per person per day plus the cost of moving and setting up the camps. Valard Ltd. and Valard paid an aggregate of $1,909,136$1,301,373 in camp rental to 964125 Alberta Ltd. during 2013.2014. Valard occasionally secures from Bram Consulting Ltd., a corporation whose shares are held by one

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

67


Certain Transactions

of Victor Budzinski’s siblings, certain supervisory services, consisting of a distribution construction foreman, at an hourly rate,

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

64


Certain Transactions

and the lease of certain personal property, including a track-hoe, at a monthly rate, resulting in payments by Valard to Bram Consulting Ltd. during 20132014 in the amount of $192,730.$62,924.

During 2014, Valard also entered into two transactions with Westcan Tel Ltd. (“Westcan”), a Canadian company owned by the spouse of Victor Budzinski. Specifically, Valard purchased heavy equipment, vehicles and other related equipment from Westcan for $3,596,460 and entered into a subcontract arrangement pursuant to which Valard performed services for Westcan and received payments in the amount of $2,199,796. We believe that the purchase price for the equipment, vehicles and other related equipment did not exceed fair market value and that the subcontract arrangement was at market rates and conditions. We also believe that these transactions had a legitimate business purpose and were beneficial to Quanta.

Valard Construction 2008 Ltd. (“Valard 2008”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Valard Ltd., employed Victor Budzinski during 20132014 and paid him an aggregate of $1,220,095$925,047 in salary, bonus and health and welfare coverage in 2014. Valard 2008 also employed Adam Budzinski, the son of Victor Budzinski, and paid him an aggregate of $925,547 in salary, bonus, health and welfare coverage and retirement plan contributions in 2013.2014. Valard employed AdamMaureen Budzinski, the son of Victor Budzinski, as well as Maureen Budzinski and Michael Budzinski, the sister and brother of Victor Budzinski, during 20132014 and paid themher an aggregate of $1,080,790, $176,318 and $167,988, respectively,$170,850 in salary, bonus, health and welfare coverage and retirement plan contributions in 2013.2014. Sharp’s Construction Services 2006 Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Valard Ltd., employed Alexander Budzinski, the son of Victor Budzinski, during 2014 and paid him an aggregate of $128,199 in salary, bonus, health and welfare coverage and other compensation in 2014. In addition, during 2013,2014, we granted (i) 2,572 RSUs to each of Victor Budzinski, and Adam Budzinski 4,679 RSUs, with a grant date fair value of $137,984, and$91,203; (ii) 2,204 RSUs to MaureenAdam Budzinski, 668 RSUs, with a grant date fair value of $19,699, vesting$78,154; and (iii) 946 RSUs to Maureen Budzinski, with a grant date fair value of $31,227. Each of the awards vest in three equal annual installments beginning in February 2014.2015. The RSUs were granted on the same terms and conditions as RSUs granted to other Canadian employees in 2013. Valard Ltd.‘s2014. The employment of Victor Budzinski, and Valard’s employment of Adam Budzinski, Maureen Budzinski, Michael Budzinski and MichaelAlexander Budzinski predated Quanta’s acquisition of Valard and its affiliates in 2010.

All amounts associated with Valard and its affiliates, other than the grant date fair value of RSU awards, were paid in local (foreign) currency. The amounts reflected above represent the U.S. dollar equivalent of the aggregate amounts reportable during 2014, based on the spot exchange rate for such foreign currency to the U.S. Dollar on December 31, 2014, as reported by theWall Street Journal.

Transactions Involving Holder of Series G Preferred Stock

Northstar Energy Services Inc. (“Northstar”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Quanta, is a party to a facility lease with Kehr Developments Inc., a corporation controlled by the Jay Gunnarson, beneficial holder of the single outstanding share of Quanta’s Series G Preferred Stock,Stock. Northstar paid $622,387 to Kehr Developments, Inc. in rental expense for 2014 related to the facility lease, and the lease has a term through January 2024. As of December 31, 2014, the remaining lease obligations were $5,826,863. Northstar is also party to a residential crew house lease with Jay Gunnarson. The facilityNorthstar paid an aggregate of $31,866 to Jay Gunnarson in rental expense for 2014 related to the crew house lease, and the lease has a term through January 2024, and as2016. As of January 14,December 31, 2014, provided forthe remaining lease obligations of $7,061,250 through the conclusion of the lease term. The crew house lease has a term through January 2016, and as of January 14, 2014, provided for aggregate remaining lease obligations of $72,307 through the conclusion of the lease term.were $34,174. These leases relate to properties that were occupied by Northstar when Quanta acquired Northstar on January 14, 2014. We believe that the rental rates of these leases do not exceed fair market value.

All amounts associated with Valard Ltd., Valard or Northstar as described above, other than the grant date fair value of RSU awards, were paid in local (foreign) currency. The amounts reflected above for such transactions represent the U.S. dollar equivalent of the aggregate amounts earned or paidreportable during 2013,2014, based on the spot exchange rate for such foreign currency to the U.S. Dollar on December 31, 2013,2014, as reported by theWall Street Journal.

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

68


Certain Transactions

Review of Related Party Transactions

We have adopted a written policy and procedures for the review, approval and ratification of transactions with related persons. Under our policy, related persons include, among others, our executive officers and other senior level employees, directors, principal stockholders, immediate family members of such persons and any other person that could significantly influence our policies. The transactions covered under our policy generally include any business transaction between Quanta and a related person, including, among others, the sale of inventory or supplies to or the purchase of inventory or supplies from a related person, and the supply of services to or receipt of services from a related person. Related party transactions involving an amount exceeding $120,000 and in which any of our directors, director nominees, executive officers, beneficial owners of greater than five percent (5%) of any class of our voting securities, or any immediate family members of the foregoing, respectively, may have an interest require the pre-approvalapproval of the Audit Committee. In considering the approval of any related party transaction, a legitimate business case must be presented that includes the reasons that the transaction is beneficial to Quanta.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file various reports with the SEC concerning their holdings of, and transactions in, our securities. Copies of these filings must be furnished to us. Based solely on our review of the copies of those forms furnished to us and written certifications from our directors and executive officers, we believe that, during 2013,2014, all of our directors and executive officers were in compliance with the applicable filing requirements, except that one report for Paul F. Yust, a former executive officer,Jesse E. Morris covering one RSU award was filed two days late one report for Wilson M. Yancey Jr. was filed one day late, and one RSU award for Peter B. O’Brien was inadvertently omitted from a report for Derrick A. Jensenand was subsequently reported on a Form 5 filed in 2014 covering an award that was not previously reported in 2012.on February 17, 2015.

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

65

69


Committee Reports

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

We have reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on our review and discussions with management, we have recommended to Quanta’s Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

This report is furnished by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

Louis C. Golm, Chairman

Vincent D. FosterBernard Fried

Margaret B. Shannon

Pat Wood, III

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

70


Committee Reports

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee is composed of four independent directors and operates under a formal written charter adopted by the Board of Directors.

As members of the Audit Committee, our primary purpose is to assist with the Board of Directors’ oversight of (1) the integrity of Quanta’s financial statements, (2) Quanta’s compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, (3) the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence, and (4) the performance of Quanta’s internal audit function and independent auditors. The Audit Committee is solely responsible for the appointment and compensation of Quanta’s independent registered public accounting firm. Management is responsible for Quanta’s financial reporting processes, including its system of internal controls, and for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Quanta’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for expressing an opinion as to whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatements based on their audit. Our responsibility is to monitor and review these processes. In carrying out our role, we rely on Quanta’s management and independent registered public accounting firm.

We have reviewed and discussed Quanta’s audited consolidated financial statements with management. Management has confirmed to us that the financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

In addition, we have discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Quanta’s independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16, as amended, issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

We have received written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with us concerning independence, and we have discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP its independence from Quanta.

Based on our review and discussions referred to above, we recommended to Quanta’s Board of Directors that Quanta’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in Quanta’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013,2014, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Bernard Fried, Chairman

James R. Ball

J. Michal ConawayVincent Foster

Worthing F. Jackman

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

66

71


Independent Auditor

 

AUDIT FEES

The Audit Committee of the Board has adopted a policy requiring pre-approval by the Audit Committee of all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. On an annual basis, the Audit Committee reviews and, as it deems appropriate, pre-approves the particular services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm and establishes specific budgets for each service. The term of any pre-approval is 12 months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee specifically provides for a different period. The Audit Committee must be informed promptly of the provision by our independent registered public accounting firm of each service that is pre-approved by the Audit Committee. In addition, the Audit Committee may periodically revise the list of pre-approved services and related fee levels, based on subsequent determinations. Any services expected to exceed pre-approved fee levels require the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members.

The following table details the aggregate fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, for fiscal years 20132014 and 2012:2013:

 

  2013   2012               2014                              2013                

Audit Fees(1)

  $2,449,557    $3,020,853  $3,234,089  $2,449,557  

Audit-Related Fees(2)

   189,883     891,173   151,166   189,883  

Tax Fees

   10,000     10,000   20,000   10,000  

All Other Fees(3)

   2,867     2,856   19,893   2,867  
  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  $2,652,307    $3,924,882  $3,425,148  $2,652,307  

 

(1)

Represents fees for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, reviews of our interim consolidated financial statements, reviews of documents filed with the SEC, evaluation of the effectiveness of Quanta’s internal control over financial reporting, state licensing pre-qualification filings, and financial statement audits of certain of our subsidiaries, as well as out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the performance of audit services. Professional fees in 2012 include audit services related to the combined financial statements of our telecommunications division that was sold effective December 3, 2012 (of which fees of approximately $1.0 million were reimbursed by the buyer).

 

(2)

Represents fees for professional services rendered for other assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements, including fees for consultations as to the accounting treatment of specific transactions based on current and proposed accounting standards, fees related to financial, tax and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act due diligence work associated with potential acquisitions, and fees related to consultations in connection with Quanta’s correspondence with the SEC or other regulatory authorities, as well as out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the performance of audit-related services.

 

(3)

Represents fees for an accounting research software tool.tools.

The Audit Committee has reviewed the services performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the related fees and has considered whether the provision of non-audit services by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is compatible with maintaining independence of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. During 2013,2014, no fees for services outside the scope of audit, review, or attestation that exceed the waiver provisions of 17 CFR 210.2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) were approved by the Audit Committee.

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

67

72


Independent Auditor

 

 

PROPOSAL NO. 2

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Quanta’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014.2015. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has served as Quanta’s independent public accounting firm since June 2002. We are asking our stockholders to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. Although ratification is not required by our bylaws or otherwise, the Audit Committee is submitting the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. In the event the stockholders do not ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of Quanta and its stockholders.

Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to be present at the annual meeting and will be provided an opportunity to make a statement, if they choose, and to respond to appropriate questions.

Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares of Common Stock, Series F Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock, voting together as a single class, present at the meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on this proposal.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a voteFOR ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

68

73


Advisory Vote to Approve

Executive Compensation

 

PROPOSAL NO. 3

ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Board is committed to excellence in corporate governance. As part of that commitment, and as required by Section 14A(a)(1) of the Exchange Act, the Board is providing Quanta’s stockholders with an opportunity to provide an advisory vote to approve the compensation of Quanta’s NEOs, as described in“Compensation Discussion and& Analysis” and“Executive Compensation” above, the compensation tables and the accompanying narrative disclosure, set forth in this proxy statement.

Based on the results of stockholder voting at the 2011 annual meeting, the Compensation Committee intends to seek stockholder guidance on executive compensation by conducting future advisory votes on executive compensation annually until the next stockholder advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes, which is scheduled to occur no later than the 2017 annual meeting. At the 20132014 annual meeting of stockholders, over 98% of Quanta’s stockholders voting on the “say-on-pay” proposal approved the compensation of our NEOs as described in our proxy statement filed with the SEC on April 10, 2013.2014.

The Compensation Committee establishes, recommends and governs the compensation and benefits policies and actions for the NEOs, as set forth under “Executive Compensation – 20132014 Summary Compensation Table.” Additional information regarding the Compensation Committee and its role is described above in the “Compensation Discussion and& Analysis” section of this proxy statement and the related tables and narrative disclosure.

Quanta’s compensation philosophy is designed to align our NEOs’ incentives with short-term and long-term stockholder value creation;creation, to attract, motivate and retain the best possible executive officer talent;talent by maintaining competitive compensation programs, to tie cash and stock incentives to the achievement of measurable company, business unit and individual performance goals that are associated with strategies intended to differentiate Quanta from its peers, to tie stock incentives to the achievement of measurable company goals that are linked to our long-term strategic plans;plans, and to promote an ownership culture. Consistent with our compensation philosophy, Quanta’s executive compensation program links a substantial portion of compensation to both individual and company performance, with a significant portion of target total direct compensation of NEOs each year being “at-risk” and, therefore, dependent upon performance against individual and company incentive targets. Moreover, equity-based awards provide an important role in our executive compensation program, providing alignment with stockholders, creating incentives for the increase of stockholder value and promoting an ownership culture. Finally, Quanta’s executive compensation program is designed to award superior performance and provide consequences for underperformance.

The Compensation Committee believes that Quanta performed very well in 2013 under Mr. O’Neil’s leadership, achieving new records in revenues, operating income, earnings per share, backlog and safety performance, notwithstanding a challenging business environment during 2013. The company short-term and long-term performance goals against which we measured performance were exceeded in 2013, resulting in above-target awards to each NEO. TheOverall, the Compensation Committee believes that the total compensation for 2013 forpaid and awarded to Quanta’s NEOs in 2014 is reasonable and appropriate, considering that Quanta exceeded its financialappropriate. Annual cash incentives were aligned with 2014 company performance goals and the individuals achieved substantially allNEOs’ achievement of their individual strategic goals for the 2013 performance year.objectives in 2014. Certain long-term equity incentives awarded to our NEOs during 2014 rewarded achievement of performance objectives and specific transactions in 2013. Other long-term equity incentives awarded to our NEOs under our new plan design either remain subject to further evaluation based on long-term company performance or are structured to promote retention.

For the reasons discussed above, the Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote in favor of the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation of Quanta’s named executive officers, as described pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Quanta’s proxy statement for the 2014

    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

74


Advisory Vote to Approve

Executive Compensation

2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, including without limitation, the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the accompanying narrative disclosure, is hereby APPROVED.”

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014 Proxy Statement

69


Advisory Vote to Approve

Executive Compensation

Advisory approval of the resolution on Quanta’s executive compensation requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares of Common Stock, Series F Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock, voting together as a single class, present at the meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on this proposal.

The results of this vote are not binding on the Board, whether or not the proposal is adopted by the aforementioned voting standard. While the resolution is non-binding, the Board values the opinions that stockholders express in their votes and in any additional dialogue. In evaluating the vote on this advisory resolution, the Board intends to consider the voting results in their entirety.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a voteFOR the advisory resolution approving Quanta’s executive compensation.

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

70

75


Additional Information

 

Stockholder Proposals and Nominations of Directors for the 20152016 Annual Meeting

Stockholders who desire to submit a proposal for inclusion in Quanta’s proxy materials for the 20152016 annual meeting of stockholders may do so by complying with the procedures set forth in Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act. To be eligible for inclusion in our proxy materials under Rule 14a-8, stockholder proposals must be received by Quanta’s Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no later than December 11, 2014.2015. Stockholder proposals should be addressed to Corporate Secretary, Quanta Services, Inc., 2800 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 2600, Houston, Texas 77056.

Under our bylaws, with respect to any stockholder proposal that is not submitted for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement under Rule 14a-8, but instead is proposed to be presented directly at our 20152016 annual meeting, and with respect to any stockholder nominees for director election, a stockholder’s notice must be received by our Corporate Secretary at the address of our principal executive offices set forth above not earlier than January 22, 20152016 and not later than February 21, 20152016 (unless the 20152016 annual meeting date is before April 2221 or after June 2120 in which case we must receive such notice not earlier than the close of business 120 days before such annual meeting date and not later than the close of business on the later of 90 days before such annual meeting date and 10 days after we first publicly announce the date of such annual meeting). However, if the number of directors to be elected at the 20152016 annual meeting of stockholders is increased and we do not publicly announce the nominee(s) for the new directorship(s) by February 11, 2015,2016, a stockholder’s notice solely with respect to nominee(s) for the additional directorship(s) must be received by our Corporate Secretary not later than 10 days after we first publicly announce the increase in the number of directors. Any such stockholder proposal and director nomination must comply in all respects with the specific requirements included in our bylaws. Our bylaws are available on Quanta’s website atwww.quantaservices.com under the heading “Investors & Media / Corporate Governance.” If a stockholder’s notice regarding a stockholder proposal or director nomination is received after the applicable deadline, our proxy materials for the 20152016 annual meeting of stockholders may confer discretionary authority to vote on such matter without any discussion of the matter in the proxy statement for our 20152016 annual meeting of stockholders.

Other Matters

As of the date of this proxy statement, the Board does not know of any other matter that will be brought before the annual meeting. Pursuant to Quanta’s bylaws, additional matters may be brought only by or at the direction of the Board. However, if any other matter properly comes before the annual meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof, the person or persons voting the proxies will vote on such matters as recommended by the Board or, if no recommendation is given, in accordance with their best judgment and discretion.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

Carolyn M. Campbell

Corporate Secretary

Houston, Texas

April 10, 20149, 2015

 

 

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.        2014    LOGO

  2015 Proxy Statement

71

76


ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.

May 22, 201421, 2015

Please date, sign and mail your proxy card in the

envelope provided as soon as possible.

i    Please Detach and Mail in the Envelope Providedi

Important Notice Regarding the Availability

of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to Be Held on May 22, 2014:Meeting:

The Notice & Proxy Statement and 2013 Annual Report to Stockholders is/are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.

PROXY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON MAY 22, 201421, 2015

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby appoints Derrick A. Jensen and Brett A. Schrader,Steven J. Kemps, and each of them, with full power of substitution to represent the undersigned and to vote all of the shares of Common Stock in Quanta Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held on May 22, 2014,21, 2015, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, (1) as hereinafter specified upon the proposals listed on the reverse side and as more particularly described in the Proxy Statement of the Company dated April 10, 20149, 2015 and (2) in their discretion upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting, including without limitation, to vote on the election of such substitute nominees as such proxies may select in the event any nominees named on this card become unable to serve as director. By granting this proxy, the undersigned hereby revokes any proxy previously granted by the undersigned (other than any proxy granted with respect to shares of Series F Preferred Stock or Series G Preferred Stock).

ALL SHARES OF COMMON STOCK REPRESENTED HEREBY WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED. IF YOU SIGN AND RETURN THIS PROXY BUT DO NOT MAKE ANY VOTING SPECIFICATIONS, SUCH SHARES WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL NO. 1, AND “FOR” PROPOSAL NOS. 2 and 3.

 

Address change/comments:

 

(If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side)


ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF

QUANTA SERVICES, INC.

May 22, 201421, 2015

VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE FOLLOWING NOMINEES:  THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE FOLLOWING:
 
  For Against Abstain      For     ForAgainst Abstain
1. Election of Directors       

Nominees:

     2. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm ¨ ¨ ¨

James R. Ball

 ¨ ¨ ¨      

J. Michal Conaway

 ¨ ¨ ¨      

Vincent D. Foster

 ¨ ¨ ¨ 

  Bernard Fried

¨¨¨      

  Louis C. GolmBernard Fried

 ¨ ¨ ¨   3. To approve, by non-binding advisory vote, Quanta’s executive compensation ¨ ¨ ¨

Louis C. Golm

¨¨¨

Worthing F. Jackman

 ¨ ¨ ¨      

James F. O’Neil III

 ¨ ¨ ¨      

Bruce Ranck

 ¨ ¨ ¨      

Margaret B. Shannon

 ¨ ¨ ¨      

Pat Wood, III

 ¨ ¨ ¨    
     NOTE: In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote on such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

For address change / comments, mark here

(see reverse for instructions)

 ¨ 

  

Signature (PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX)DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by duly authorized officer.

Signature (PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX)DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date


QUANTA SERVICES, INC.

PROXY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON MAY 22, 201421, 2015

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby appoints Derrick A. Jensen and Brett A. Schrader,Steven J. Kemps, and each of them, with full power of substitution to represent the undersigned and to vote the share of Series F Preferred Stock in Quanta Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held on May 22, 2014,21, 2015, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, (1) as hereinafter specified upon the proposals listed herein and as more particularly described in the Proxy Statement of the Company dated April 10, 20149, 2015 and (2) in their discretion upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting, including without limitation, to vote on the election of such substitute nominees as such proxies may select in the event any nominees named on this card become unable to serve as director. By granting this proxy, the undersigned hereby revokes any proxy previously granted by the undersigned (other than any proxy granted with respect to shares of Common Stock) to the extent necessary to avoid casting a number of votes greater than the number of votes that the undersigned holder of the Series F Preferred Stock is entitled to cast.

THE SHARE OF SERIES F PREFERRED STOCK REPRESENTED HEREBY WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED. IF YOU SIGN AND RETURN THIS PROXY BUT DO NOT MAKE ANY VOTING SPECIFICATIONS, SUCH SHARE WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL NO. 1 AND “FOR” PROPOSAL NOS. 2 AND 3.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the

Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on May 22, 2014:21, 2015:

The Notice, Proxy Statement and 20132014 Annual Report to Stockholders are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

SERIES F PREFERRED STOCK

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A

VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE FOLLOWING NOMINEES:

  THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE FOLLOWING:
 
  For Against Abstain      For     ForAgainst Abstain

1. Election of Directors

        

Nominees:

     2. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm ¨ ¨ ¨

James R. Ball

 ¨ ¨ ¨     

J. Michal Conaway

 ¨ ¨ ¨     

Vincent D. Foster

 ¨ ¨ ¨    

Bernard Fried

 ¨ ¨ ¨  

  Louis C. Golm

¨¨¨  3. To approve, by non-binding advisory vote, Quanta’s executive compensation ¨ ¨ ¨

Louis C. Golm

¨¨¨

Worthing F. Jackman

 ¨ ¨ ¨    

James F. O’Neil III

 ¨ ¨ ¨    

Bruce Ranck

 ¨ ¨ ¨    

Margaret B. Shannon

 ¨ ¨ ¨    

Pat Wood, III

 ¨ ¨ ¨    
    

NOTE: In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote on such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

 

 

  

  

 

  

 

Signature

  Date  Capacity  Number of Votes to be Cast as indicated herein

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by duly authorized officer.


QUANTA SERVICES, INC.

PROXY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON MAY 22, 201421, 2015

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby appoints Derrick A. Jensen and Brett A. Schrader,Steven J. Kemps, and each of them, with full power of substitution to represent the undersigned and to vote the share of Series G Preferred Stock in Quanta Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held on May 22, 2014,21, 2015, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, (1) as hereinafter specified upon the proposals listed herein and as more particularly described in the Proxy Statement of the Company dated April 10, 20149, 2015 and (2) in their discretion upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting, including without limitation, to vote on the election of such substitute nominees as such proxies may select in the event any nominees named on this card become unable to serve as director. By granting this proxy, the undersigned hereby revokes any proxy previously granted by the undersigned (other than any proxy granted with respect to shares of Common Stock) to the extent necessary to avoid casting a number of votes greater than the number of votes that the undersigned holder of the Series G Preferred Stock is entitled to cast.

THE SHARE OF SERIES G PREFERRED STOCK REPRESENTED HEREBY WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED. IF YOU SIGN AND RETURN THIS PROXY BUT DO NOT MAKE ANY VOTING SPECIFICATIONS, SUCH SHARE WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL NO. 1 AND “FOR” PROPOSAL NOS. 2 AND 3.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the

Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on May 22, 2014:21, 2015:

The Notice, Proxy Statement and 20132014 Annual Report to Stockholders are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

SERIES G PREFERRED STOCK

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A

VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE FOLLOWING NOMINEES:

  THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE FOLLOWING:
 
  For Against Abstain      For     ForAgainst Abstain

1. Election of Directors

        

Nominees:

     2. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm ¨ ¨ ¨

James R. Ball

 ¨ ¨ ¨     

J. Michal Conaway

 ¨ ¨ ¨     

Vincent D. Foster

 ¨ ¨ ¨    

Bernard Fried

 ¨ ¨ ¨  

  Louis C. Golm

¨¨¨  3. To approve, by non-binding advisory vote, Quanta’s executive compensation ¨ ¨ ¨

Louis C. Golm

¨¨¨

Worthing F. Jackman

 ¨ ¨ ¨     

James F. O’Neil III

 ¨ ¨ ¨     

Bruce Ranck

 ¨ ¨ ¨     

Margaret B. Shannon

 ¨ ¨ ¨     

Pat Wood, III

 ¨ ¨ ¨     
    

NOTE: In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote on such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

 

 

  

  

 

  

 

Signature

  Date  Capacity  Number of Votes to be Cast as indicated herein

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by duly authorized officer.